一种新的心血管决策支持框架,用于有效的临床风险评估

Kamran Farooq, J. Karasek, H. Atassi, A. Hussain, Peipei Yang, C. Macrae, M. Mahmud, B. Luo, W. Slack
{"title":"一种新的心血管决策支持框架,用于有效的临床风险评估","authors":"Kamran Farooq, J. Karasek, H. Atassi, A. Hussain, Peipei Yang, C. Macrae, M. Mahmud, B. Luo, W. Slack","doi":"10.1109/CICARE.2014.7007843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study is to help improve the diagnostic and performance capabilities of Rapid Access Chest Pain Clinics (RACPC), by reducing delay and inaccuracies in the cardiovascular risk assessment of patients with chest pain by helping clinicians effectively distinguish acute angina patients from those with other causes of chest pain. Key to our new approach is (1) an intelligent prospective clinical decision support framework for primary and secondary care clinicians, (2) learning from missing/impartial clinical data using Bernoulli mixture models and Expectation Maximisation (EM) techniques, (3) utilisation of state-of-the-art feature section, pattern recognition and data mining techniques for the development of intelligent risk prediction models for cardiovascular patients. The study cohort comprises of 632 patients suspected of cardiac chest pain. A retrospective data analysis of the clinical studies evaluating clinical risk factors for chest pain patients was performed for the development of RACPC specific risk assessment models to distinguish between cardiac and non cardiac chest pain. A comparative analysis case study of machine learning methods was carried out for predicting RACPC clinical outcomes using real patient data acquired from Raigmore Hospital in Inverness, UK. The proposed framework was also validated using the University of Cleveland's Heart Disease dataset which contains 76 attributes, but all published experiments refer to using a subset of 14 of them. Experiments with the Cleveland database (based on 18 clinical features of 270 patients) were concentrated on attempting to distinguish the presence of heart disease (values 1, 2, 3, 4) from absence (value 0). The new clinical models, having been evaluated in clinical practice, resulted in very good predictive power, demonstrating general performance improvement over benchmark multivariate statistical classifiers. As part of these case studies, various online RACPC risk assessment prototypes have been developed which are being deployed in the clinical setting (NHS Highland) for clinical trial purposes.","PeriodicalId":120730,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Healthcare and e-health (CICARE)","volume":"137 8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A novel cardiovascular decision support framework for effective clinical risk assessment\",\"authors\":\"Kamran Farooq, J. Karasek, H. Atassi, A. Hussain, Peipei Yang, C. Macrae, M. Mahmud, B. Luo, W. Slack\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CICARE.2014.7007843\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this study is to help improve the diagnostic and performance capabilities of Rapid Access Chest Pain Clinics (RACPC), by reducing delay and inaccuracies in the cardiovascular risk assessment of patients with chest pain by helping clinicians effectively distinguish acute angina patients from those with other causes of chest pain. Key to our new approach is (1) an intelligent prospective clinical decision support framework for primary and secondary care clinicians, (2) learning from missing/impartial clinical data using Bernoulli mixture models and Expectation Maximisation (EM) techniques, (3) utilisation of state-of-the-art feature section, pattern recognition and data mining techniques for the development of intelligent risk prediction models for cardiovascular patients. The study cohort comprises of 632 patients suspected of cardiac chest pain. A retrospective data analysis of the clinical studies evaluating clinical risk factors for chest pain patients was performed for the development of RACPC specific risk assessment models to distinguish between cardiac and non cardiac chest pain. A comparative analysis case study of machine learning methods was carried out for predicting RACPC clinical outcomes using real patient data acquired from Raigmore Hospital in Inverness, UK. The proposed framework was also validated using the University of Cleveland's Heart Disease dataset which contains 76 attributes, but all published experiments refer to using a subset of 14 of them. Experiments with the Cleveland database (based on 18 clinical features of 270 patients) were concentrated on attempting to distinguish the presence of heart disease (values 1, 2, 3, 4) from absence (value 0). The new clinical models, having been evaluated in clinical practice, resulted in very good predictive power, demonstrating general performance improvement over benchmark multivariate statistical classifiers. As part of these case studies, various online RACPC risk assessment prototypes have been developed which are being deployed in the clinical setting (NHS Highland) for clinical trial purposes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":120730,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Healthcare and e-health (CICARE)\",\"volume\":\"137 8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Healthcare and e-health (CICARE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CICARE.2014.7007843\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Healthcare and e-health (CICARE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CICARE.2014.7007843","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

本研究的目的是通过帮助临床医生有效区分急性心绞痛患者与其他原因的胸痛患者,减少胸痛患者心血管风险评估的延迟和不准确性,从而帮助提高快速通道胸痛诊所(RACPC)的诊断和表现能力。我们的新方法的关键是:(1)为初级和二级护理临床医生提供一个智能的前瞻性临床决策支持框架,(2)使用伯努利混合模型和期望最大化(EM)技术从缺失/公正的临床数据中学习,(3)利用最先进的特征部分,模式识别和数据挖掘技术开发心血管患者的智能风险预测模型。该研究队列包括632名疑似心源性胸痛的患者。回顾性分析评价胸痛患者临床危险因素的临床研究资料,建立区分心源性和非心源性胸痛的RACPC特异性风险评估模型。使用从英国因弗内斯Raigmore医院获得的真实患者数据,对机器学习方法进行了预测RACPC临床结果的对比分析案例研究。提出的框架也使用克利夫兰大学的心脏病数据集进行了验证,该数据集包含76个属性,但所有发表的实验都是使用其中14个属性的子集。使用Cleveland数据库(基于270例患者的18个临床特征)进行的实验集中在试图区分心脏病的存在(值1、2、3、4)和不存在(值0)。新的临床模型在临床实践中得到了评估,结果具有非常好的预测能力,比基准的多变量统计分类器表现出总体性能的提高。作为这些案例研究的一部分,已经开发了各种在线RACPC风险评估原型,这些原型正在临床环境(NHS Highland)中用于临床试验目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A novel cardiovascular decision support framework for effective clinical risk assessment
The aim of this study is to help improve the diagnostic and performance capabilities of Rapid Access Chest Pain Clinics (RACPC), by reducing delay and inaccuracies in the cardiovascular risk assessment of patients with chest pain by helping clinicians effectively distinguish acute angina patients from those with other causes of chest pain. Key to our new approach is (1) an intelligent prospective clinical decision support framework for primary and secondary care clinicians, (2) learning from missing/impartial clinical data using Bernoulli mixture models and Expectation Maximisation (EM) techniques, (3) utilisation of state-of-the-art feature section, pattern recognition and data mining techniques for the development of intelligent risk prediction models for cardiovascular patients. The study cohort comprises of 632 patients suspected of cardiac chest pain. A retrospective data analysis of the clinical studies evaluating clinical risk factors for chest pain patients was performed for the development of RACPC specific risk assessment models to distinguish between cardiac and non cardiac chest pain. A comparative analysis case study of machine learning methods was carried out for predicting RACPC clinical outcomes using real patient data acquired from Raigmore Hospital in Inverness, UK. The proposed framework was also validated using the University of Cleveland's Heart Disease dataset which contains 76 attributes, but all published experiments refer to using a subset of 14 of them. Experiments with the Cleveland database (based on 18 clinical features of 270 patients) were concentrated on attempting to distinguish the presence of heart disease (values 1, 2, 3, 4) from absence (value 0). The new clinical models, having been evaluated in clinical practice, resulted in very good predictive power, demonstrating general performance improvement over benchmark multivariate statistical classifiers. As part of these case studies, various online RACPC risk assessment prototypes have been developed which are being deployed in the clinical setting (NHS Highland) for clinical trial purposes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信