发展商信息需求二十年实证研究的初步分析

Abir Bouraffa, W. Maalej
{"title":"发展商信息需求二十年实证研究的初步分析","authors":"Abir Bouraffa, W. Maalej","doi":"10.1145/3387940.3391485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the last two decades, developers' daily intake of information has been constantly on the rise and so has the interest of research in investigating the information needs of developers. Knowledge about what information they seek and which sources they rely on is scarce and has to be updated regularly to match the rapid changes in development practices. In this paper, we reflect on the scientific studies published in this field over the last two decades. We present preliminary results of our analysis of a study sample where we particularly focus on the research methods used, the number of recruited participants, and the organisational context in which they emerged. We have investigated a total of 54 studies from 41 publications and found that convenience sampling is the predominant sampling strategy with a prevalence of the industrial organisational context. Moreover, the majority of studies had a reduced sample size and draw participants from a single organisation resulting in high sample homogeneity. Among the studies carried out in industry 51.9% recruited participants from Microsoft.","PeriodicalId":309659,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM 42nd International Conference on Software Engineering Workshops","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Two Decades of Empirical Research on Developers' Information Needs: A Preliminary Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Abir Bouraffa, W. Maalej\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3387940.3391485\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Over the last two decades, developers' daily intake of information has been constantly on the rise and so has the interest of research in investigating the information needs of developers. Knowledge about what information they seek and which sources they rely on is scarce and has to be updated regularly to match the rapid changes in development practices. In this paper, we reflect on the scientific studies published in this field over the last two decades. We present preliminary results of our analysis of a study sample where we particularly focus on the research methods used, the number of recruited participants, and the organisational context in which they emerged. We have investigated a total of 54 studies from 41 publications and found that convenience sampling is the predominant sampling strategy with a prevalence of the industrial organisational context. Moreover, the majority of studies had a reduced sample size and draw participants from a single organisation resulting in high sample homogeneity. Among the studies carried out in industry 51.9% recruited participants from Microsoft.\",\"PeriodicalId\":309659,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM 42nd International Conference on Software Engineering Workshops\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM 42nd International Conference on Software Engineering Workshops\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3387940.3391485\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM 42nd International Conference on Software Engineering Workshops","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3387940.3391485","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

在过去的二十年中,开发人员的日常信息摄入量一直在不断增加,因此研究开发人员的信息需求的兴趣也在不断增加。关于他们寻找什么信息以及他们依赖哪些来源的知识是稀缺的,并且必须定期更新以匹配开发实践中的快速变化。在本文中,我们回顾了过去二十年来在这一领域发表的科学研究。我们对一个研究样本进行了初步分析,其中我们特别关注所使用的研究方法、招募的参与者数量以及他们出现的组织背景。我们调查了来自41份出版物的54项研究,发现便利抽样是工业组织背景下普遍存在的主要抽样策略。此外,大多数研究减少了样本量,并从单个组织中抽取参与者,从而导致高样本同质性。在工业领域进行的研究中,51.9%的参与者来自微软。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Two Decades of Empirical Research on Developers' Information Needs: A Preliminary Analysis
Over the last two decades, developers' daily intake of information has been constantly on the rise and so has the interest of research in investigating the information needs of developers. Knowledge about what information they seek and which sources they rely on is scarce and has to be updated regularly to match the rapid changes in development practices. In this paper, we reflect on the scientific studies published in this field over the last two decades. We present preliminary results of our analysis of a study sample where we particularly focus on the research methods used, the number of recruited participants, and the organisational context in which they emerged. We have investigated a total of 54 studies from 41 publications and found that convenience sampling is the predominant sampling strategy with a prevalence of the industrial organisational context. Moreover, the majority of studies had a reduced sample size and draw participants from a single organisation resulting in high sample homogeneity. Among the studies carried out in industry 51.9% recruited participants from Microsoft.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信