Aleksandra Pavićević
{"title":"EUTANAZIJA KAO KRAJNJI IZRAZ LIČNOG PRAVA ČOVEKA NA SAMOODREĐENjE","authors":"Aleksandra Pavićević","doi":"10.46793/uvp21.647p","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The author discusses different segments of the institute of euthanasia (\"murder out of mercy\"), especially the question of the justification of its legalization. The subject of the analysis are the solutions of certain European regulations that have completely or partially decriminalized euthanasia, and then the domestic one, in which there is a collision of the norms of criminal and medical law. According to the positive serbian criminal law, euthanasia is a criminal offense and a privileged form of murder, while the Law on Patients' Rights indirectly allows the so-called passive euthanasia, which is not the optimal solution, which introduces legal uncertainty. Тhe Preliminary Draft of the Civil Code of Serbia, which embodies the proposal for the future civil law of Serbia, proposes the decriminalization of euthanasia, which is a solution that needs to be commented on. The aim of the paper is a comparative analysis of domestic and foreign solutions of this controversial institute - through its concept, types (active and passive euthanasia) and critical analysis of the reasons for and against its introduction into the domestic law. The author evaluates the proposal of the Preliminary Draft as progress, with the idea that euthanasia, despite all the controversies that accompany it, represents the ultimate expression of a personal right to self-determination (subjective civil right sui generis), in both modalities, without distinction.","PeriodicalId":349295,"journal":{"name":"USLUGE i vladavina prava","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"USLUGE i vladavina prava","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46793/uvp21.647p","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作者讨论了安乐死(“出于仁慈的谋杀”)制度的不同部分,特别是其合法化的正当性问题。分析的主题是某些欧洲法规的解决方案,这些法规完全或部分地将安乐死合法化,然后是国内法规,其中存在刑法和医疗法规范的冲突。根据塞尔维亚实在法,安乐死是一种刑事犯罪,是一种特权的谋杀形式,而《病人权利法》间接允许所谓的被动安乐死,这不是最优解决方案,引入了法律的不确定性。Тhe《塞尔维亚民法典初稿》体现了对塞尔维亚未来民法的建议,其中提出了安乐死的非刑事化,这是一个需要评论的解决方案。本文的目的是通过其概念、类型(主动和被动安乐死)以及对其引入国内法的原因和反对原因的批判性分析,对这一有争议的机构的国内外解决方案进行比较分析。笔者将《初步草案》的建议评价为一种进步,认为安乐死,尽管伴随着所有的争议,代表了个人自决权(主观民事自决权)的最终表达,在两种形式下,没有区别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
EUTANAZIJA KAO KRAJNJI IZRAZ LIČNOG PRAVA ČOVEKA NA SAMOODREĐENjE
The author discusses different segments of the institute of euthanasia ("murder out of mercy"), especially the question of the justification of its legalization. The subject of the analysis are the solutions of certain European regulations that have completely or partially decriminalized euthanasia, and then the domestic one, in which there is a collision of the norms of criminal and medical law. According to the positive serbian criminal law, euthanasia is a criminal offense and a privileged form of murder, while the Law on Patients' Rights indirectly allows the so-called passive euthanasia, which is not the optimal solution, which introduces legal uncertainty. Тhe Preliminary Draft of the Civil Code of Serbia, which embodies the proposal for the future civil law of Serbia, proposes the decriminalization of euthanasia, which is a solution that needs to be commented on. The aim of the paper is a comparative analysis of domestic and foreign solutions of this controversial institute - through its concept, types (active and passive euthanasia) and critical analysis of the reasons for and against its introduction into the domestic law. The author evaluates the proposal of the Preliminary Draft as progress, with the idea that euthanasia, despite all the controversies that accompany it, represents the ultimate expression of a personal right to self-determination (subjective civil right sui generis), in both modalities, without distinction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信