评价肾清除率增强的危重患者选用广谱亲水性抗生素的标准剂量:一项观察性研究

M. Almutairi, K. Sulaiman, S. Alenazi, R. Vishwakarma, Ohoud Aljuhani
{"title":"评价肾清除率增强的危重患者选用广谱亲水性抗生素的标准剂量:一项观察性研究","authors":"M. Almutairi, K. Sulaiman, S. Alenazi, R. Vishwakarma, Ohoud Aljuhani","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-726484/v1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Background: Inappropriate antibiotics dosing in critically ill patients with augmented renal clearance (ARC) may be associated with pathogens resistance and worse outcomes. Unfortunately, studies regarding the relationship between ARC and clinical outcomes in patients treated with antibiotics medication are rare. The study aims to evaluate the efficacy and clinical outcomes of selected broad spectrum hydrophilic antibiotics (Meropenem, Imipinem, Piperacillin/Tazobactam) in augmented renal function critically ill patients with confirmed infections.Methods: A retrospective cohort study in critically ill patients who were admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) at King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC)-Riyadh and received broad-spectrum Hydrophilic antibiotics (Meropenem, Imipenem, or Piperacillin/Tazobactam) with confirmed infection. All the patients who met our inclusion criteria during the study period (01/01/2018 – 31/12/2019) were included. Eligible patients have been divided into two groups (augmented renal clearance (ARC) Vs. Non-ARC) according to the estimated creatinine clearance (CrCl) to assess pathogen eradication at 10-14 days. Results: A total of 2682 patients were screened; 133 patients were included in the study. The eradication of pathogen at 10-14 days in ARC group was non-inferior to non-ARC group (OR 1.08; 95% CI, 0.41–2.78 p = 0.88). The Resistance (OR 0.78; 95% CI, 0.25–2.40 p = 0.66), and Persistence after 3 days (OR 0.88; 95% CI, 0.35–2.18 p = 0.78) were not significantly different between the groups. In other words, patients with ARC have the same rate of resistance and persistence of pathogen after three days. There was no difference in the 30-day mortality between the two groups (OR 0.22; 95% CI, 0.04–1.40 p = 0.11). Also, there was no difference in the ICU length of stay (LOS) nor in hospital LOS between the two groups (22.0 days vs. 17.5 days, p = 0.37), and (51.0 days vs. 30.0 days, p = 0.07) respectively. Conclusion: Using standard dosing of hydrophilic broad-spectrum antibiotics in ARC patients was not inferior to non-ARC patients in terms of the pathogen eradication, resistance, and persistence. Further randomized clinical and interventional studies are required to confirm our findings.","PeriodicalId":345799,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Critical Care Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Standard Dosing for Selected Broad Spectrum Hydrophilic Antibiotics in Critically Ill Patients with Augmented Renal Clearance: An Observational Study\",\"authors\":\"M. Almutairi, K. Sulaiman, S. Alenazi, R. Vishwakarma, Ohoud Aljuhani\",\"doi\":\"10.21203/rs.3.rs-726484/v1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Background: Inappropriate antibiotics dosing in critically ill patients with augmented renal clearance (ARC) may be associated with pathogens resistance and worse outcomes. Unfortunately, studies regarding the relationship between ARC and clinical outcomes in patients treated with antibiotics medication are rare. The study aims to evaluate the efficacy and clinical outcomes of selected broad spectrum hydrophilic antibiotics (Meropenem, Imipinem, Piperacillin/Tazobactam) in augmented renal function critically ill patients with confirmed infections.Methods: A retrospective cohort study in critically ill patients who were admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) at King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC)-Riyadh and received broad-spectrum Hydrophilic antibiotics (Meropenem, Imipenem, or Piperacillin/Tazobactam) with confirmed infection. All the patients who met our inclusion criteria during the study period (01/01/2018 – 31/12/2019) were included. Eligible patients have been divided into two groups (augmented renal clearance (ARC) Vs. Non-ARC) according to the estimated creatinine clearance (CrCl) to assess pathogen eradication at 10-14 days. Results: A total of 2682 patients were screened; 133 patients were included in the study. The eradication of pathogen at 10-14 days in ARC group was non-inferior to non-ARC group (OR 1.08; 95% CI, 0.41–2.78 p = 0.88). The Resistance (OR 0.78; 95% CI, 0.25–2.40 p = 0.66), and Persistence after 3 days (OR 0.88; 95% CI, 0.35–2.18 p = 0.78) were not significantly different between the groups. In other words, patients with ARC have the same rate of resistance and persistence of pathogen after three days. There was no difference in the 30-day mortality between the two groups (OR 0.22; 95% CI, 0.04–1.40 p = 0.11). Also, there was no difference in the ICU length of stay (LOS) nor in hospital LOS between the two groups (22.0 days vs. 17.5 days, p = 0.37), and (51.0 days vs. 30.0 days, p = 0.07) respectively. Conclusion: Using standard dosing of hydrophilic broad-spectrum antibiotics in ARC patients was not inferior to non-ARC patients in terms of the pathogen eradication, resistance, and persistence. Further randomized clinical and interventional studies are required to confirm our findings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":345799,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Saudi Critical Care Journal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Saudi Critical Care Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-726484/v1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Critical Care Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-726484/v1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在肾清除率增强(ARC)的危重患者中,不适当的抗生素剂量可能与病原体耐药性和更糟糕的结局有关。不幸的是,关于ARC与抗生素治疗患者临床结果之间关系的研究很少。本研究旨在评估选定的广谱亲水性抗生素(美罗培南、亚胺平、哌拉西林/他唑巴坦)对确诊感染的肾功能增强危重患者的疗效和临床结果。方法:对在利雅得阿卜杜勒阿齐兹国王医疗城(KAMC)重症监护病房(icu)接受广谱亲水抗生素(美罗培南、亚胺培南或哌拉西林/他唑巴坦)确诊感染的危重患者进行回顾性队列研究。所有在研究期间(2018年1月1日至2019年12月31日)符合我们纳入标准的患者都被纳入。根据估计的肌酐清除率(CrCl)将符合条件的患者分为两组(增强肾清除率(ARC)和非ARC),以评估10-14天的病原体根除情况。结果:共筛选2682例患者;133名患者参与了这项研究。ARC组10-14 d病原菌根除率不低于非ARC组(OR 1.08;95% CI, 0.41-2.78 p = 0.88)。阻力(OR 0.78;95% CI, 0.25-2.40 p = 0.66)和3天后的持久性(OR 0.88;95% CI (0.35 ~ 2.18 p = 0.78)组间差异无统计学意义。换句话说,ARC患者在3天后的耐药率和病原体持久性相同。两组患者的30天死亡率无差异(OR 0.22;95% CI, 0.04-1.40 p = 0.11)。两组患者的ICU住院时间(LOS)和住院时间(LOS)均无差异(分别为22.0天对17.5天,p = 0.37)和51.0天对30.0天,p = 0.07)。结论:在ARC患者中使用标准剂量的亲水广谱抗生素在病原体根除、耐药和持久性方面不低于非ARC患者。需要进一步的随机临床和介入性研究来证实我们的发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Standard Dosing for Selected Broad Spectrum Hydrophilic Antibiotics in Critically Ill Patients with Augmented Renal Clearance: An Observational Study
Background: Inappropriate antibiotics dosing in critically ill patients with augmented renal clearance (ARC) may be associated with pathogens resistance and worse outcomes. Unfortunately, studies regarding the relationship between ARC and clinical outcomes in patients treated with antibiotics medication are rare. The study aims to evaluate the efficacy and clinical outcomes of selected broad spectrum hydrophilic antibiotics (Meropenem, Imipinem, Piperacillin/Tazobactam) in augmented renal function critically ill patients with confirmed infections.Methods: A retrospective cohort study in critically ill patients who were admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) at King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC)-Riyadh and received broad-spectrum Hydrophilic antibiotics (Meropenem, Imipenem, or Piperacillin/Tazobactam) with confirmed infection. All the patients who met our inclusion criteria during the study period (01/01/2018 – 31/12/2019) were included. Eligible patients have been divided into two groups (augmented renal clearance (ARC) Vs. Non-ARC) according to the estimated creatinine clearance (CrCl) to assess pathogen eradication at 10-14 days. Results: A total of 2682 patients were screened; 133 patients were included in the study. The eradication of pathogen at 10-14 days in ARC group was non-inferior to non-ARC group (OR 1.08; 95% CI, 0.41–2.78 p = 0.88). The Resistance (OR 0.78; 95% CI, 0.25–2.40 p = 0.66), and Persistence after 3 days (OR 0.88; 95% CI, 0.35–2.18 p = 0.78) were not significantly different between the groups. In other words, patients with ARC have the same rate of resistance and persistence of pathogen after three days. There was no difference in the 30-day mortality between the two groups (OR 0.22; 95% CI, 0.04–1.40 p = 0.11). Also, there was no difference in the ICU length of stay (LOS) nor in hospital LOS between the two groups (22.0 days vs. 17.5 days, p = 0.37), and (51.0 days vs. 30.0 days, p = 0.07) respectively. Conclusion: Using standard dosing of hydrophilic broad-spectrum antibiotics in ARC patients was not inferior to non-ARC patients in terms of the pathogen eradication, resistance, and persistence. Further randomized clinical and interventional studies are required to confirm our findings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信