{"title":"在需求规范中，易读性与可实现性之间的交易:实验性评估","authors":"J. Jacquot, A. Valdenaire","doi":"10.1109/ISRE.1995.512560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ideally, a requirement specification language should lead to highly readable text while being implementable. Unfortunately, current technology does not offer good support for features which enhance legibility such as elisions, flexible syntaxes, and more generally incomplete texts. GLIDER's designers have deliberately included those features in the language, thus forbidding some texts to be processed. This study is a rigorous assessment, both qualitative and quantitative, of this decision on the first step of processing: the parsing of terms.","PeriodicalId":354711,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of 1995 IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering (RE'95)","volume":"185 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trading legibility against implementability in requirement specifications: an experimental assessment\",\"authors\":\"J. Jacquot, A. Valdenaire\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISRE.1995.512560\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Ideally, a requirement specification language should lead to highly readable text while being implementable. Unfortunately, current technology does not offer good support for features which enhance legibility such as elisions, flexible syntaxes, and more generally incomplete texts. GLIDER's designers have deliberately included those features in the language, thus forbidding some texts to be processed. This study is a rigorous assessment, both qualitative and quantitative, of this decision on the first step of processing: the parsing of terms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":354711,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of 1995 IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering (RE'95)\",\"volume\":\"185 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of 1995 IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering (RE'95)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISRE.1995.512560\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of 1995 IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering (RE'95)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISRE.1995.512560","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Trading legibility against implementability in requirement specifications: an experimental assessment
Ideally, a requirement specification language should lead to highly readable text while being implementable. Unfortunately, current technology does not offer good support for features which enhance legibility such as elisions, flexible syntaxes, and more generally incomplete texts. GLIDER's designers have deliberately included those features in the language, thus forbidding some texts to be processed. This study is a rigorous assessment, both qualitative and quantitative, of this decision on the first step of processing: the parsing of terms.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
