物联网通信协议的分析

Arthur Brito Cosmi, Vinícius F. S. Mota
{"title":"物联网通信协议的分析","authors":"Arthur Brito Cosmi, Vinícius F. S. Mota","doi":"10.5753/courb.2019.7475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the growth of devices connected to the Internet, several application layer protocols specific for the Internet of Things (IoT) appear every day. This high number of protocols bring doubts to developers about what to use in their projects. This work aims to assist developers in the decision making in their IoT projects. This work presents a qualitative analysis of the MQTT, MQTT-SN, CoAP and AMQP protocols. In a qualitative way, we analyzed thedomains of application and requirements of the applications to map the protocol choice. After that, the MQTT and CoAP protocols were analyzed using devices with low processing and memory capabilities. Results show that MQTT outperforms CoAP when there are several other devices accessing the same access point.","PeriodicalId":371238,"journal":{"name":"Workshop de Computação Urbana (CoUrb)","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Uma Análise dos Protocolos de Comunicação para Internet das Coisas\",\"authors\":\"Arthur Brito Cosmi, Vinícius F. S. Mota\",\"doi\":\"10.5753/courb.2019.7475\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the growth of devices connected to the Internet, several application layer protocols specific for the Internet of Things (IoT) appear every day. This high number of protocols bring doubts to developers about what to use in their projects. This work aims to assist developers in the decision making in their IoT projects. This work presents a qualitative analysis of the MQTT, MQTT-SN, CoAP and AMQP protocols. In a qualitative way, we analyzed thedomains of application and requirements of the applications to map the protocol choice. After that, the MQTT and CoAP protocols were analyzed using devices with low processing and memory capabilities. Results show that MQTT outperforms CoAP when there are several other devices accessing the same access point.\",\"PeriodicalId\":371238,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Workshop de Computação Urbana (CoUrb)\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Workshop de Computação Urbana (CoUrb)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5753/courb.2019.7475\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Workshop de Computação Urbana (CoUrb)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5753/courb.2019.7475","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

随着连接到互联网的设备的增长,每天都会出现一些针对物联网(IoT)的应用层协议。如此之多的协议给开发人员在他们的项目中使用什么带来了疑问。这项工作旨在帮助开发人员在物联网项目中做出决策。本文对MQTT、MQTT- sn、CoAP和AMQP协议进行了定性分析。我们定性地分析了应用程序的领域和应用程序的需求,以映射协议选择。之后,使用处理和内存能力较低的设备分析MQTT和CoAP协议。结果表明,当有多个其他设备访问同一接入点时,MQTT的性能优于CoAP。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Uma Análise dos Protocolos de Comunicação para Internet das Coisas
With the growth of devices connected to the Internet, several application layer protocols specific for the Internet of Things (IoT) appear every day. This high number of protocols bring doubts to developers about what to use in their projects. This work aims to assist developers in the decision making in their IoT projects. This work presents a qualitative analysis of the MQTT, MQTT-SN, CoAP and AMQP protocols. In a qualitative way, we analyzed thedomains of application and requirements of the applications to map the protocol choice. After that, the MQTT and CoAP protocols were analyzed using devices with low processing and memory capabilities. Results show that MQTT outperforms CoAP when there are several other devices accessing the same access point.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信