铜损伤校正深度神经方法的训练与可解释性。

K. Hickmann, Skylar Callis, Stephen Andrews
{"title":"铜损伤校正深度神经方法的训练与可解释性。","authors":"K. Hickmann, Skylar Callis, Stephen Andrews","doi":"10.1115/vvuq2023-108759","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n We present an application of convolutional neural networks for calibration of a tensile plasticity (TePla) damage model simulating the spallation in copper under high-explosive shock loading. Using a high-fidelity, multi-physics simulation developed by the Advanced Simulation and Computing program at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), we simulate hundreds of variations of a high-explosive shock experiment involving a copper coupon. From this synthetic data, we train neural networks to learn the inverse mapping between the coupon’s late-time density field, or an associated synthetic radiograph, and the simulation’s TePla damage parameters. It is demonstrated that, using a simple convolutional architecture, we can train networks to infer damage parameters from density fields accurately. Neural network inference directly from synthetic radiographs is significantly more challenging. Application of machine-learning methods must be accompanied by an analysis of how they are making inferences in order to build confidence in predictions and to identify likely shortcomings of the technique. To understand what the model is learning, individual layer outputs are extracted and examined. Each layer in the network identifies multiple features. However, each of these features are not necessarily of equal importance in the network’s final prediction of a given damage parameter. By examining the features overlaid on the input hydrodynamic fields, we assess the question of whether or not the model’s accuracy can be attributed to human-recognizable characteristics. In this work we give a detailed description of our data-generation methods and the learning problem we address. We then outline our neural architecture trained for damage calibration and discuss considerations made during training and evaluation of accuracy. Methods for human interpretation of the network’s inference process are then put forward, including extraction of learned features from the trained network and techniques to assess sensitivity of inferences to the learned features.","PeriodicalId":387733,"journal":{"name":"ASME 2023 Verification, Validation, and Uncertainty Quantification Symposium","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Training and Interpretability of Deep-Neural Methods for Damage Calibration in Copper.\",\"authors\":\"K. Hickmann, Skylar Callis, Stephen Andrews\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/vvuq2023-108759\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n We present an application of convolutional neural networks for calibration of a tensile plasticity (TePla) damage model simulating the spallation in copper under high-explosive shock loading. Using a high-fidelity, multi-physics simulation developed by the Advanced Simulation and Computing program at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), we simulate hundreds of variations of a high-explosive shock experiment involving a copper coupon. From this synthetic data, we train neural networks to learn the inverse mapping between the coupon’s late-time density field, or an associated synthetic radiograph, and the simulation’s TePla damage parameters. It is demonstrated that, using a simple convolutional architecture, we can train networks to infer damage parameters from density fields accurately. Neural network inference directly from synthetic radiographs is significantly more challenging. Application of machine-learning methods must be accompanied by an analysis of how they are making inferences in order to build confidence in predictions and to identify likely shortcomings of the technique. To understand what the model is learning, individual layer outputs are extracted and examined. Each layer in the network identifies multiple features. However, each of these features are not necessarily of equal importance in the network’s final prediction of a given damage parameter. By examining the features overlaid on the input hydrodynamic fields, we assess the question of whether or not the model’s accuracy can be attributed to human-recognizable characteristics. In this work we give a detailed description of our data-generation methods and the learning problem we address. We then outline our neural architecture trained for damage calibration and discuss considerations made during training and evaluation of accuracy. Methods for human interpretation of the network’s inference process are then put forward, including extraction of learned features from the trained network and techniques to assess sensitivity of inferences to the learned features.\",\"PeriodicalId\":387733,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ASME 2023 Verification, Validation, and Uncertainty Quantification Symposium\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ASME 2023 Verification, Validation, and Uncertainty Quantification Symposium\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/vvuq2023-108759\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASME 2023 Verification, Validation, and Uncertainty Quantification Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/vvuq2023-108759","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们提出了一种卷积神经网络的应用,用于校准模拟高爆冲击载荷下铜的拉伸塑性(TePla)损伤模型。使用由洛斯阿拉莫斯国家实验室(LANL)的高级模拟和计算程序开发的高保真多物理场模拟,我们模拟了涉及铜片的高爆炸冲击实验的数百种变化。从这些合成数据中,我们训练神经网络来学习复合材料的后期密度场(或相关的合成射线图)与模拟TePla损伤参数之间的逆映射。结果表明,使用简单的卷积结构,我们可以训练网络准确地从密度场中推断出损伤参数。直接从合成x光片进行神经网络推理显然更具挑战性。机器学习方法的应用必须伴随着对它们如何进行推断的分析,以建立对预测的信心,并确定该技术可能存在的缺点。为了理解模型正在学习什么,提取并检查各个层的输出。网络中的每一层都识别多个特征。然而,在网络对给定损伤参数的最终预测中,这些特征中的每一个都不一定同等重要。通过检查叠加在输入水动力场上的特征,我们评估模型的准确性是否可以归因于人类可识别的特征。在这项工作中,我们详细描述了我们的数据生成方法和我们解决的学习问题。然后,我们概述了我们的神经结构训练损伤校准,并讨论在训练和准确性评估期间所做的考虑。然后提出了人类解释网络推理过程的方法,包括从训练网络中提取学习特征和评估推理对学习特征的敏感性的技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Training and Interpretability of Deep-Neural Methods for Damage Calibration in Copper.
We present an application of convolutional neural networks for calibration of a tensile plasticity (TePla) damage model simulating the spallation in copper under high-explosive shock loading. Using a high-fidelity, multi-physics simulation developed by the Advanced Simulation and Computing program at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), we simulate hundreds of variations of a high-explosive shock experiment involving a copper coupon. From this synthetic data, we train neural networks to learn the inverse mapping between the coupon’s late-time density field, or an associated synthetic radiograph, and the simulation’s TePla damage parameters. It is demonstrated that, using a simple convolutional architecture, we can train networks to infer damage parameters from density fields accurately. Neural network inference directly from synthetic radiographs is significantly more challenging. Application of machine-learning methods must be accompanied by an analysis of how they are making inferences in order to build confidence in predictions and to identify likely shortcomings of the technique. To understand what the model is learning, individual layer outputs are extracted and examined. Each layer in the network identifies multiple features. However, each of these features are not necessarily of equal importance in the network’s final prediction of a given damage parameter. By examining the features overlaid on the input hydrodynamic fields, we assess the question of whether or not the model’s accuracy can be attributed to human-recognizable characteristics. In this work we give a detailed description of our data-generation methods and the learning problem we address. We then outline our neural architecture trained for damage calibration and discuss considerations made during training and evaluation of accuracy. Methods for human interpretation of the network’s inference process are then put forward, including extraction of learned features from the trained network and techniques to assess sensitivity of inferences to the learned features.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信