{"title":"竞选捐款对立法者行为的影响:乳业内部利益集团竞争","authors":"K. Dwyer, Thomas Stratmann","doi":"10.1086/726845","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the 1996 farm bill, the House of Representatives passed a bill reducing government protections for farmers by 2000. Before its implementation in 1999, the chamber passed a bill reversing these changes. We test the hypothesis that the reversal occurred because of changes in the allocation of campaign contributions from farmers, competing processors, and grocers. To estimate causal effects, we employ a legislator fixed effect logit model. The findings support the hypothesis that the strategic allocation of funds by special interests caused the legislative body to reverse its 1996 vote.","PeriodicalId":289840,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Political Economy Microeconomics","volume":"70 6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Campaign Contributions on Legislator Behavior: Intra Dairy Industry Interest Group Competition\",\"authors\":\"K. Dwyer, Thomas Stratmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/726845\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the 1996 farm bill, the House of Representatives passed a bill reducing government protections for farmers by 2000. Before its implementation in 1999, the chamber passed a bill reversing these changes. We test the hypothesis that the reversal occurred because of changes in the allocation of campaign contributions from farmers, competing processors, and grocers. To estimate causal effects, we employ a legislator fixed effect logit model. The findings support the hypothesis that the strategic allocation of funds by special interests caused the legislative body to reverse its 1996 vote.\",\"PeriodicalId\":289840,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Political Economy Microeconomics\",\"volume\":\"70 6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Political Economy Microeconomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/726845\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Political Economy Microeconomics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/726845","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effect of Campaign Contributions on Legislator Behavior: Intra Dairy Industry Interest Group Competition
In the 1996 farm bill, the House of Representatives passed a bill reducing government protections for farmers by 2000. Before its implementation in 1999, the chamber passed a bill reversing these changes. We test the hypothesis that the reversal occurred because of changes in the allocation of campaign contributions from farmers, competing processors, and grocers. To estimate causal effects, we employ a legislator fixed effect logit model. The findings support the hypothesis that the strategic allocation of funds by special interests caused the legislative body to reverse its 1996 vote.