改革欧洲社会模式与指标政治:从欧洲就业战略中的失业率到就业率

R. Salais
{"title":"改革欧洲社会模式与指标政治:从欧洲就业战略中的失业率到就业率","authors":"R. Salais","doi":"10.46692/9781847421616.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Open Method of Coordination (OMC) was introduced for the purpose of monitoring the ‘modernisation’ of the European social model from a hypothetical ‘centre’ towards greater flexibility, better economic efficiency and lower costs. What verdict can be issued concerning the OMC, in the context of reform of the European social model? This chapter will focus on the European Employment Strategy as an exemplar of what could be called ‘a politics of indicators’, by which is meant the specific type of political action and monitoring introduced by the OMC. Under the European Employment Strategy (EES) the benchmarking of national employment policies, by means of a set of indicators, plays a key role. In benchmarking management techniques, identifying good practices is the precondition for finding ways of applying them (Tronti 2001). The performance gaps between firms have to be measured in a consistent and reliable manner and properly correlated with the objectives of the firm. They must be clearly attributable to the causes, i.e. the good practices. It is at this decisive point that the indicators appear on the scene. While, in the case of a","PeriodicalId":202854,"journal":{"name":"Unwrapping the European Social Model","volume":"93 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"38","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reforming the European Social Model and the politics of indicators: from the unemployment rate to the employment rate in the European Employment Strategy\",\"authors\":\"R. Salais\",\"doi\":\"10.46692/9781847421616.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Open Method of Coordination (OMC) was introduced for the purpose of monitoring the ‘modernisation’ of the European social model from a hypothetical ‘centre’ towards greater flexibility, better economic efficiency and lower costs. What verdict can be issued concerning the OMC, in the context of reform of the European social model? This chapter will focus on the European Employment Strategy as an exemplar of what could be called ‘a politics of indicators’, by which is meant the specific type of political action and monitoring introduced by the OMC. Under the European Employment Strategy (EES) the benchmarking of national employment policies, by means of a set of indicators, plays a key role. In benchmarking management techniques, identifying good practices is the precondition for finding ways of applying them (Tronti 2001). The performance gaps between firms have to be measured in a consistent and reliable manner and properly correlated with the objectives of the firm. They must be clearly attributable to the causes, i.e. the good practices. It is at this decisive point that the indicators appear on the scene. While, in the case of a\",\"PeriodicalId\":202854,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Unwrapping the European Social Model\",\"volume\":\"93 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"38\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Unwrapping the European Social Model\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46692/9781847421616.009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Unwrapping the European Social Model","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46692/9781847421616.009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 38

摘要

开放协调方法(OMC)的引入是为了监测欧洲社会模式的“现代化”,从一个假设的“中心”走向更大的灵活性,更好的经济效率和更低的成本。在欧洲社会模式改革的背景下,对OMC可以做出什么裁决?本章将集中讨论欧洲就业战略,将其作为所谓“指标政治”的范例,即OMC引入的特定类型的政治行动和监测。根据《欧洲就业战略》,通过一套指标对国家就业政策制定基准起着关键作用。在对标管理技术中,确定良好的实践是找到应用它们的方法的先决条件(Tronti 2001)。企业之间的绩效差距必须以一致和可靠的方式进行衡量,并与企业的目标适当相关。它们必须清楚地归因于原因,即良好做法。正是在这个决定性的时刻,各种指标出现了。然而,在a的情况下
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reforming the European Social Model and the politics of indicators: from the unemployment rate to the employment rate in the European Employment Strategy
The Open Method of Coordination (OMC) was introduced for the purpose of monitoring the ‘modernisation’ of the European social model from a hypothetical ‘centre’ towards greater flexibility, better economic efficiency and lower costs. What verdict can be issued concerning the OMC, in the context of reform of the European social model? This chapter will focus on the European Employment Strategy as an exemplar of what could be called ‘a politics of indicators’, by which is meant the specific type of political action and monitoring introduced by the OMC. Under the European Employment Strategy (EES) the benchmarking of national employment policies, by means of a set of indicators, plays a key role. In benchmarking management techniques, identifying good practices is the precondition for finding ways of applying them (Tronti 2001). The performance gaps between firms have to be measured in a consistent and reliable manner and properly correlated with the objectives of the firm. They must be clearly attributable to the causes, i.e. the good practices. It is at this decisive point that the indicators appear on the scene. While, in the case of a
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信