民族主义

Deendayal Upadhyaya, A. Ganguly, S. Bakshi, A. Jha, S. Shukla, Shubhendu Anand, A. Anand, Vaibhav Chadha, Amit Kumar, Pravin Abhishek
{"title":"民族主义","authors":"Deendayal Upadhyaya, A. Ganguly, S. Bakshi, A. Jha, S. Shukla, Shubhendu Anand, A. Anand, Vaibhav Chadha, Amit Kumar, Pravin Abhishek","doi":"10.1515/9780824881870-020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Federal Census Act for 1880 provided for a report upon the condition of each person enumerated, and whether employed or unemployed, and if unemployed, during what portion of the year. In the Federal Census Act for 1890 this clause is conspicuous by its absence. Whether or not the omission is of significance, and if so, to what extent, a historic review of our recent census and labor statistics may help to determine. Honestly collated and judiciously applied, statistics may, due allowance being made for their serious and unavoidable defects, point approximately to the truth. Our labor organizations shrewdly surmised that were publicity given to the actual facts concerning child and woman labor, hours of work, wages, enforced idleness, and kindred matters, much of the optimism that blocked the way to social reforms would vanish. Accordingly, at an early day they demanded official investigations of the condition of the people. The demand was apparently granted. In a number of states bureaus of labor statistics were actually established. But the reports that issued from these bureaus were inane and confused; with regard to some of the subjects on which light was especially desired, they were mostly silent; and, despite criticism, this course was adhered to with suspicious tenacity. Foremost among these suspicious omissions was that of all information touching the average enforced idleness among the wage receivers. A notable exception herein was made by the Massachusetts decennial census for 1875, issued by the Massachusetts bureau of labor statistics, of which Mr. Carroll D. Wright then was, and till recently continued to be, the chief. In it was found a table exhibiting the average number of days in which the wage receivers were employed in 260 of the principal industries of the state;1 and although the report neglected to point out the important conclusions to which the table led, it enabled a careful computation to bring out the fact that the average idleness among those wage receivers amounted to almost exactly one fourth","PeriodicalId":181622,"journal":{"name":"A World after Liberalism","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE NATIONALIST\",\"authors\":\"Deendayal Upadhyaya, A. Ganguly, S. Bakshi, A. Jha, S. Shukla, Shubhendu Anand, A. Anand, Vaibhav Chadha, Amit Kumar, Pravin Abhishek\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/9780824881870-020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Federal Census Act for 1880 provided for a report upon the condition of each person enumerated, and whether employed or unemployed, and if unemployed, during what portion of the year. In the Federal Census Act for 1890 this clause is conspicuous by its absence. Whether or not the omission is of significance, and if so, to what extent, a historic review of our recent census and labor statistics may help to determine. Honestly collated and judiciously applied, statistics may, due allowance being made for their serious and unavoidable defects, point approximately to the truth. Our labor organizations shrewdly surmised that were publicity given to the actual facts concerning child and woman labor, hours of work, wages, enforced idleness, and kindred matters, much of the optimism that blocked the way to social reforms would vanish. Accordingly, at an early day they demanded official investigations of the condition of the people. The demand was apparently granted. In a number of states bureaus of labor statistics were actually established. But the reports that issued from these bureaus were inane and confused; with regard to some of the subjects on which light was especially desired, they were mostly silent; and, despite criticism, this course was adhered to with suspicious tenacity. Foremost among these suspicious omissions was that of all information touching the average enforced idleness among the wage receivers. A notable exception herein was made by the Massachusetts decennial census for 1875, issued by the Massachusetts bureau of labor statistics, of which Mr. Carroll D. Wright then was, and till recently continued to be, the chief. In it was found a table exhibiting the average number of days in which the wage receivers were employed in 260 of the principal industries of the state;1 and although the report neglected to point out the important conclusions to which the table led, it enabled a careful computation to bring out the fact that the average idleness among those wage receivers amounted to almost exactly one fourth\",\"PeriodicalId\":181622,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"A World after Liberalism\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"A World after Liberalism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/9780824881870-020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"A World after Liberalism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9780824881870-020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

1880年的《联邦人口普查法》规定了一份关于被枚举的每个人的状况的报告,以及是否就业或失业,如果失业,在一年中的哪个部分。在1890年的《联邦人口普查法》中,这一条款的缺失是显而易见的。这种遗漏是否重要,如果重要,在多大程度上,对我们最近的人口普查和劳工统计数据进行历史性的回顾可能有助于确定。统计数据如果经过诚实的整理和明智的运用,虽然有严重的和不可避免的缺陷,但它可能近似地指向事实。我们的劳工组织精明地推测,如果有关童工和妇女劳动、工作时间、工资、被迫无所事事和类似问题的实际情况得到宣传,那么阻碍社会改革的许多乐观主义就会消失。因此,他们一早就要求对人民的状况进行正式调查。这一要求显然得到了批准。许多州都成立了劳工统计局。但是这些部门发布的报告是空洞和混乱的;对于一些特别需要光线照射的东西,他们多半不吭声;尽管受到批评,这一方针还是以可疑的顽强坚持下去。在这些可疑的遗漏中,最重要的是所有涉及工资接受者平均被迫无所事事的信息。一个值得注意的例外是1875年马萨诸塞州十年一次的人口普查,由马萨诸塞州劳工统计局发布,卡罗尔·d·赖特先生当时是局长,直到最近一直是局长。在报告中发现了一张表,显示了国家260个主要行业中领工资的人的平均受雇日数;尽管报告没有指出由这张表得出的重要结论,但通过仔细计算,可以得出这样一个事实,即领工资的人的平均空闲时间几乎正好是四分之一
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
THE NATIONALIST
The Federal Census Act for 1880 provided for a report upon the condition of each person enumerated, and whether employed or unemployed, and if unemployed, during what portion of the year. In the Federal Census Act for 1890 this clause is conspicuous by its absence. Whether or not the omission is of significance, and if so, to what extent, a historic review of our recent census and labor statistics may help to determine. Honestly collated and judiciously applied, statistics may, due allowance being made for their serious and unavoidable defects, point approximately to the truth. Our labor organizations shrewdly surmised that were publicity given to the actual facts concerning child and woman labor, hours of work, wages, enforced idleness, and kindred matters, much of the optimism that blocked the way to social reforms would vanish. Accordingly, at an early day they demanded official investigations of the condition of the people. The demand was apparently granted. In a number of states bureaus of labor statistics were actually established. But the reports that issued from these bureaus were inane and confused; with regard to some of the subjects on which light was especially desired, they were mostly silent; and, despite criticism, this course was adhered to with suspicious tenacity. Foremost among these suspicious omissions was that of all information touching the average enforced idleness among the wage receivers. A notable exception herein was made by the Massachusetts decennial census for 1875, issued by the Massachusetts bureau of labor statistics, of which Mr. Carroll D. Wright then was, and till recently continued to be, the chief. In it was found a table exhibiting the average number of days in which the wage receivers were employed in 260 of the principal industries of the state;1 and although the report neglected to point out the important conclusions to which the table led, it enabled a careful computation to bring out the fact that the average idleness among those wage receivers amounted to almost exactly one fourth
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信