变化的冲刷效应

T. Kippenberger
{"title":"变化的冲刷效应","authors":"T. Kippenberger","doi":"10.1108/EUM0000000006771","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Declares that, although employees and employers used to have a work relationship, with regard to mutual interest and lifetime employment through good performance and loyalty, this idea was abandoned by employers in the 1980s as they tried to limit job security expectations. Lists 8 points that have eroded traditional employment, discussing them in full. States the effects of change have affected employment relationships in larger companies and these are: the change in employment security; contingent workers and contracting out; the way work is organized; and training. Sums up that workers no longer see employers as responsible for their employability and now take that responsibility on themselves.","PeriodicalId":178456,"journal":{"name":"The Antidote","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The scouring effect of change\",\"authors\":\"T. Kippenberger\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/EUM0000000006771\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Declares that, although employees and employers used to have a work relationship, with regard to mutual interest and lifetime employment through good performance and loyalty, this idea was abandoned by employers in the 1980s as they tried to limit job security expectations. Lists 8 points that have eroded traditional employment, discussing them in full. States the effects of change have affected employment relationships in larger companies and these are: the change in employment security; contingent workers and contracting out; the way work is organized; and training. Sums up that workers no longer see employers as responsible for their employability and now take that responsibility on themselves.\",\"PeriodicalId\":178456,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Antidote\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Antidote\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000006771\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Antidote","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000006771","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

声明,虽然雇员和雇主曾经有一种工作关系,关于通过良好的表现和忠诚来实现共同利益和终身雇佣,但这种想法在20世纪80年代被雇主放弃了,因为他们试图限制工作保障的期望。列举了侵蚀传统就业的8点,并对其进行了全面讨论。变化的影响影响了大公司的雇佣关系,这些是:就业保障的变化;临时工和外判;工作的组织方式;和培训。总而言之,工人不再认为雇主对他们的就业能力负责,现在他们自己承担了这个责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The scouring effect of change
Declares that, although employees and employers used to have a work relationship, with regard to mutual interest and lifetime employment through good performance and loyalty, this idea was abandoned by employers in the 1980s as they tried to limit job security expectations. Lists 8 points that have eroded traditional employment, discussing them in full. States the effects of change have affected employment relationships in larger companies and these are: the change in employment security; contingent workers and contracting out; the way work is organized; and training. Sums up that workers no longer see employers as responsible for their employability and now take that responsibility on themselves.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信