智能手机测角仪应用程序可靠和方便的测量手指的运动范围:比较研究

H. Theile, Sarah Walsh, P. Scougall, D. Ryan, Shivank Chopra
{"title":"智能手机测角仪应用程序可靠和方便的测量手指的运动范围:比较研究","authors":"H. Theile, Sarah Walsh, P. Scougall, D. Ryan, Shivank Chopra","doi":"10.34239/ajops.v5n2.335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ObjectiveGoniometer measurements are commonly used in hand clinics to follow progress or as an outcome measure for acute and chronic conditions. The use of an Apple iPhone goniometer application (smartphone app) may provide a practical alternative for clinicians. This study sought to assess accuracy in range-of-motion measurements obtained by a smartphone app compared to a traditional universal goniometer (UG) in healthy and diseased hands.\nMethodsPatients with various hand disease processes were recruited through a tertiary hospital hand clinic, as well as healthy volunteers. Middle and little fingers were assessed at the metacarpophalangeal (MCP), proximal interphalangeal (PIP) and distal interphalangeal (DIP) joints for flexion and extension. Measurements were taken using a UG and a smartphone app by two independent evaluators using a standardised proforma.\nResultsTwenty patients were recruited (50% male, 50% female; 13 healthy volunteers and seven with hand pathology). There were no significant differences in measurements using the smartphone app. The only significant difference found using the UG was for little finger PIP joint flexion; however, the difference was only 2.5°. Comparison of the average measurements using a UG and smartphone app found significant differences for six joints, with none of these > 5° (largest 4.6°).\nConclusionThe smartphone app is as reliable as traditional UG and would be a practical tool for everyday use in hand clinics. Its uptake may provide broader utility for patient self-measurement and telemedicine.","PeriodicalId":264055,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Plastic Surgery","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Smartphone goniometer application for reliable and convenient measurement of finger range of motion: a comparative study\",\"authors\":\"H. Theile, Sarah Walsh, P. Scougall, D. Ryan, Shivank Chopra\",\"doi\":\"10.34239/ajops.v5n2.335\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ObjectiveGoniometer measurements are commonly used in hand clinics to follow progress or as an outcome measure for acute and chronic conditions. The use of an Apple iPhone goniometer application (smartphone app) may provide a practical alternative for clinicians. This study sought to assess accuracy in range-of-motion measurements obtained by a smartphone app compared to a traditional universal goniometer (UG) in healthy and diseased hands.\\nMethodsPatients with various hand disease processes were recruited through a tertiary hospital hand clinic, as well as healthy volunteers. Middle and little fingers were assessed at the metacarpophalangeal (MCP), proximal interphalangeal (PIP) and distal interphalangeal (DIP) joints for flexion and extension. Measurements were taken using a UG and a smartphone app by two independent evaluators using a standardised proforma.\\nResultsTwenty patients were recruited (50% male, 50% female; 13 healthy volunteers and seven with hand pathology). There were no significant differences in measurements using the smartphone app. The only significant difference found using the UG was for little finger PIP joint flexion; however, the difference was only 2.5°. Comparison of the average measurements using a UG and smartphone app found significant differences for six joints, with none of these > 5° (largest 4.6°).\\nConclusionThe smartphone app is as reliable as traditional UG and would be a practical tool for everyday use in hand clinics. Its uptake may provide broader utility for patient self-measurement and telemedicine.\",\"PeriodicalId\":264055,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australasian Journal of Plastic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australasian Journal of Plastic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34239/ajops.v5n2.335\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34239/ajops.v5n2.335","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的手部测量仪测量通常用于跟踪进展或作为急性和慢性疾病的结果测量。使用苹果iPhone测角仪应用程序(智能手机应用程序)可能为临床医生提供一个实用的选择。本研究旨在评估智能手机应用程序与传统通用测角仪(UG)在健康和患病双手中的运动范围测量的准确性。方法通过三级医院手病门诊招募不同病程的患者和健康志愿者。评估中指和小指在掌指关节(MCP)、近指间关节(PIP)和远指间关节(DIP)的屈伸情况。由两名独立评估人员使用标准化形式,使用UG和智能手机应用程序进行测量。结果共纳入20例患者(男性50%,女性50%;13名健康志愿者和7名手部病变志愿者)。使用智能手机应用程序的测量结果没有显著差异。使用UG发现的唯一显著差异是小指PIP关节屈曲;然而,差异只有2.5°。使用UG和智能手机应用程序进行的平均测量比较发现,六个关节的平均测量值存在显著差异,没有一个大于5°(最大4.6°)。结论智能手机应用程序与传统UG一样可靠,可作为手部诊所日常使用的实用工具。它的应用可能为病人自我测量和远程医疗提供更广泛的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Smartphone goniometer application for reliable and convenient measurement of finger range of motion: a comparative study
ObjectiveGoniometer measurements are commonly used in hand clinics to follow progress or as an outcome measure for acute and chronic conditions. The use of an Apple iPhone goniometer application (smartphone app) may provide a practical alternative for clinicians. This study sought to assess accuracy in range-of-motion measurements obtained by a smartphone app compared to a traditional universal goniometer (UG) in healthy and diseased hands. MethodsPatients with various hand disease processes were recruited through a tertiary hospital hand clinic, as well as healthy volunteers. Middle and little fingers were assessed at the metacarpophalangeal (MCP), proximal interphalangeal (PIP) and distal interphalangeal (DIP) joints for flexion and extension. Measurements were taken using a UG and a smartphone app by two independent evaluators using a standardised proforma. ResultsTwenty patients were recruited (50% male, 50% female; 13 healthy volunteers and seven with hand pathology). There were no significant differences in measurements using the smartphone app. The only significant difference found using the UG was for little finger PIP joint flexion; however, the difference was only 2.5°. Comparison of the average measurements using a UG and smartphone app found significant differences for six joints, with none of these > 5° (largest 4.6°). ConclusionThe smartphone app is as reliable as traditional UG and would be a practical tool for everyday use in hand clinics. Its uptake may provide broader utility for patient self-measurement and telemedicine.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信