会话式推荐系统中基于功能需求的复合评价

Z. Baizal, Y. R. Murti, Adiwijaya
{"title":"会话式推荐系统中基于功能需求的复合评价","authors":"Z. Baizal, Y. R. Murti, Adiwijaya","doi":"10.1109/ICOICT.2017.8074656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Conversational recommender system (CRS) is a form of recommender system that can refine user preference through conversational mechanism. User preference refinement can be proceeded in reference to the user's feedback towards the products recommended, called as critiquing technique. Compound critiquing technique has been widely developed to ensure the interaction efficiency in CRS. However, the compound critiques offered refer to the product technical features. In terms of hi-tech products, not all consumers are familiar with technical features. A model for generating functional requirement-based compound critiques (instead of technical features-based) has been developed in our previous work. In this paper, we evaluate this model from the aspects of recommendation accuracy, query refinement, and user satisfaction. The user study involving 88 users (either familiar or unfamiliar with technical features) shows that the approach has successfully increased the users' positive perception compared to the recommender system commonly used in e-commerce. Besides, this approach has a high recommendation accuracy (89.77%) and has successfully refined the users' needs.","PeriodicalId":244500,"journal":{"name":"2017 5th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology (ICoIC7)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating functional requirements-based compound critiquing on conversational recommender system\",\"authors\":\"Z. Baizal, Y. R. Murti, Adiwijaya\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICOICT.2017.8074656\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Conversational recommender system (CRS) is a form of recommender system that can refine user preference through conversational mechanism. User preference refinement can be proceeded in reference to the user's feedback towards the products recommended, called as critiquing technique. Compound critiquing technique has been widely developed to ensure the interaction efficiency in CRS. However, the compound critiques offered refer to the product technical features. In terms of hi-tech products, not all consumers are familiar with technical features. A model for generating functional requirement-based compound critiques (instead of technical features-based) has been developed in our previous work. In this paper, we evaluate this model from the aspects of recommendation accuracy, query refinement, and user satisfaction. The user study involving 88 users (either familiar or unfamiliar with technical features) shows that the approach has successfully increased the users' positive perception compared to the recommender system commonly used in e-commerce. Besides, this approach has a high recommendation accuracy (89.77%) and has successfully refined the users' needs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":244500,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 5th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology (ICoIC7)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 5th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology (ICoIC7)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOICT.2017.8074656\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 5th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology (ICoIC7)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOICT.2017.8074656","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

会话推荐系统(CRS)是一种通过会话机制来细化用户偏好的推荐系统。用户偏好细化可以参考用户对推荐产品的反馈进行,称为批评技术。为了保证CRS的相互作用效率,复合评判技术得到了广泛的发展。然而,所提供的化合物批评是指产品的技术特征。就高科技产品而言,并非所有消费者都熟悉其技术特点。在我们之前的工作中,已经开发了一个用于生成基于功能需求的复合批评(而不是基于技术特性的)的模型。在本文中,我们从推荐准确性、查询精细化和用户满意度方面对该模型进行了评估。对88名用户(熟悉或不熟悉技术特征的用户)的用户研究表明,与电子商务中常用的推荐系统相比,该方法成功地增加了用户的积极感知。此外,该方法具有较高的推荐准确率(89.77%),并成功地细化了用户的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating functional requirements-based compound critiquing on conversational recommender system
Conversational recommender system (CRS) is a form of recommender system that can refine user preference through conversational mechanism. User preference refinement can be proceeded in reference to the user's feedback towards the products recommended, called as critiquing technique. Compound critiquing technique has been widely developed to ensure the interaction efficiency in CRS. However, the compound critiques offered refer to the product technical features. In terms of hi-tech products, not all consumers are familiar with technical features. A model for generating functional requirement-based compound critiques (instead of technical features-based) has been developed in our previous work. In this paper, we evaluate this model from the aspects of recommendation accuracy, query refinement, and user satisfaction. The user study involving 88 users (either familiar or unfamiliar with technical features) shows that the approach has successfully increased the users' positive perception compared to the recommender system commonly used in e-commerce. Besides, this approach has a high recommendation accuracy (89.77%) and has successfully refined the users' needs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信