自体和异体成纤维细胞植入真皮替代物后的活力和功能。

N. Morimoto, Y. Saso, K. Tomihata, Tsuguyoshi Taira, Yoshitake Takahashi, Masayoshi Ohta, Shigehiko Suzuki
{"title":"自体和异体成纤维细胞植入真皮替代物后的活力和功能。","authors":"N. Morimoto, Y. Saso, K. Tomihata, Tsuguyoshi Taira, Yoshitake Takahashi, Masayoshi Ohta, Shigehiko Suzuki","doi":"10.1111/J.1067-1927.2005.130116AP.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nFibroblast-seeded collagen sponges have been used for the treatment of skin defects and skin ulcers. However, the viability of the fibroblasts after implantation is still unknown. The objective of this study was to investigate the viability and distribution of autologous and allogeneic fibroblasts after implantation and to clarify which type is more effective for wound healing.\n\n\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\nSkin samples of Hartley guinea pigs were retrieved and autologous fibroblasts were isolated and cultured. Fibroblasts isolated from the skin of a Strain2 guinea pig were used as allogeneic fibroblasts. Three full-thickness wounds were created on the backs of guinea pigs and an acellular collagen sponge, a collagen sponge seeded with autologous fibroblasts, and a collagen sponge seeded with allogeneic fibroblasts were transplanted. Before implantation, fibroblasts were labeled with PKH26. The guinea pigs were sacrificed 1, 2, and 3 weeks after implantation. The epithelization and contraction of the wounds were assessed, and the viability and distribution of the seeded fibroblasts were observed in cross sections.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThree weeks after implantation, the PKH26-labeled autologous and allogeneic fibroblasts remained viable. In the wounds covered with the autologous fibroblast-seeded collagen sponge, the epithelization was fastest, and the percent wound contraction was smallest. In contrast, in the wounds covered with allogeneic fibroblasts, the epithelization was slowest and the percent contraction was largest.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nThe allogeneic fibroblasts seeded in the collagen sponge survived and remained viable on the grafted area, but did not accelerate wound healing.","PeriodicalId":191568,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of surgical research","volume":"125 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"64","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Viability and function of autologous and allogeneic fibroblasts seeded in dermal substitutes after implantation.\",\"authors\":\"N. Morimoto, Y. Saso, K. Tomihata, Tsuguyoshi Taira, Yoshitake Takahashi, Masayoshi Ohta, Shigehiko Suzuki\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/J.1067-1927.2005.130116AP.X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\nFibroblast-seeded collagen sponges have been used for the treatment of skin defects and skin ulcers. However, the viability of the fibroblasts after implantation is still unknown. The objective of this study was to investigate the viability and distribution of autologous and allogeneic fibroblasts after implantation and to clarify which type is more effective for wound healing.\\n\\n\\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\\nSkin samples of Hartley guinea pigs were retrieved and autologous fibroblasts were isolated and cultured. Fibroblasts isolated from the skin of a Strain2 guinea pig were used as allogeneic fibroblasts. Three full-thickness wounds were created on the backs of guinea pigs and an acellular collagen sponge, a collagen sponge seeded with autologous fibroblasts, and a collagen sponge seeded with allogeneic fibroblasts were transplanted. Before implantation, fibroblasts were labeled with PKH26. The guinea pigs were sacrificed 1, 2, and 3 weeks after implantation. The epithelization and contraction of the wounds were assessed, and the viability and distribution of the seeded fibroblasts were observed in cross sections.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nThree weeks after implantation, the PKH26-labeled autologous and allogeneic fibroblasts remained viable. In the wounds covered with the autologous fibroblast-seeded collagen sponge, the epithelization was fastest, and the percent wound contraction was smallest. In contrast, in the wounds covered with allogeneic fibroblasts, the epithelization was slowest and the percent contraction was largest.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSION\\nThe allogeneic fibroblasts seeded in the collagen sponge survived and remained viable on the grafted area, but did not accelerate wound healing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":191568,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of surgical research\",\"volume\":\"125 1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"64\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of surgical research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1067-1927.2005.130116AP.X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of surgical research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1067-1927.2005.130116AP.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 64

摘要

成纤维细胞种子胶原海绵已被用于皮肤缺损和皮肤溃疡的治疗。然而,成纤维细胞在植入后的生存能力尚不清楚。本研究的目的是研究植入后自体和异体成纤维细胞的生存能力和分布,并阐明哪种类型对伤口愈合更有效。材料与方法提取哈特利豚鼠皮肤标本,分离培养自身成纤维细胞。从豚鼠2株皮肤分离成纤维细胞作为同种异体成纤维细胞。在豚鼠背部创面3个全层创面,移植脱细胞胶原海绵、自体成纤维细胞胶原海绵和同种异体成纤维细胞胶原海绵。植入前,用PKH26标记成纤维细胞。植入后1、2、3周处死豚鼠。观察创面的上皮和收缩情况,并在横断面上观察成纤维细胞的活力和分布。结果植入后3周,pkh26标记的自体和异体成纤维细胞仍能存活。自体成纤维细胞胶原蛋白海绵覆盖的创面上皮化速度最快,创面收缩率最小。相比之下,同种异体成纤维细胞覆盖的伤口上皮化最慢,收缩百分比最大。结论胶原海绵中同种异体成纤维细胞在移植区存活,但对伤口愈合无促进作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Viability and function of autologous and allogeneic fibroblasts seeded in dermal substitutes after implantation.
BACKGROUND Fibroblast-seeded collagen sponges have been used for the treatment of skin defects and skin ulcers. However, the viability of the fibroblasts after implantation is still unknown. The objective of this study was to investigate the viability and distribution of autologous and allogeneic fibroblasts after implantation and to clarify which type is more effective for wound healing. MATERIALS AND METHODS Skin samples of Hartley guinea pigs were retrieved and autologous fibroblasts were isolated and cultured. Fibroblasts isolated from the skin of a Strain2 guinea pig were used as allogeneic fibroblasts. Three full-thickness wounds were created on the backs of guinea pigs and an acellular collagen sponge, a collagen sponge seeded with autologous fibroblasts, and a collagen sponge seeded with allogeneic fibroblasts were transplanted. Before implantation, fibroblasts were labeled with PKH26. The guinea pigs were sacrificed 1, 2, and 3 weeks after implantation. The epithelization and contraction of the wounds were assessed, and the viability and distribution of the seeded fibroblasts were observed in cross sections. RESULTS Three weeks after implantation, the PKH26-labeled autologous and allogeneic fibroblasts remained viable. In the wounds covered with the autologous fibroblast-seeded collagen sponge, the epithelization was fastest, and the percent wound contraction was smallest. In contrast, in the wounds covered with allogeneic fibroblasts, the epithelization was slowest and the percent contraction was largest. CONCLUSION The allogeneic fibroblasts seeded in the collagen sponge survived and remained viable on the grafted area, but did not accelerate wound healing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信