被迫分裂

Joseph Blocher, G. Gulati
{"title":"被迫分裂","authors":"Joseph Blocher, G. Gulati","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2841965","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many of the central challenges in international law arise from bad relationships between regions and the nations in which they are located. Some scholars and advocates argue for a right of remedial secession for regions facing oppression. Should states be able to claim an analogous right of “remedial expulsion” against malefactor regions? If it is an act of “self-determination” for the people of a region to leave a nation against the nation’s wishes, is the same thing true when they wish to stay against its wishes? Since acquisition and possession of territory is no longer the national priority it once was, can nations simply let go of undesirable regions — including former colonial outposts — that are proving too expensive? We argue that the traditional rules, based on the acceptance in international law of the legitimacy of imperial conquest, should be modified with a market-type system that permits forced secession in some circumstances, but imposes a penalty on the expelling nation.","PeriodicalId":258423,"journal":{"name":"AARN: Theorizing Politics & Power (Political) (Topic)","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Forced Secessions\",\"authors\":\"Joseph Blocher, G. Gulati\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2841965\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Many of the central challenges in international law arise from bad relationships between regions and the nations in which they are located. Some scholars and advocates argue for a right of remedial secession for regions facing oppression. Should states be able to claim an analogous right of “remedial expulsion” against malefactor regions? If it is an act of “self-determination” for the people of a region to leave a nation against the nation’s wishes, is the same thing true when they wish to stay against its wishes? Since acquisition and possession of territory is no longer the national priority it once was, can nations simply let go of undesirable regions — including former colonial outposts — that are proving too expensive? We argue that the traditional rules, based on the acceptance in international law of the legitimacy of imperial conquest, should be modified with a market-type system that permits forced secession in some circumstances, but imposes a penalty on the expelling nation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":258423,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AARN: Theorizing Politics & Power (Political) (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AARN: Theorizing Politics & Power (Political) (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2841965\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AARN: Theorizing Politics & Power (Political) (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2841965","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

国际法中的许多主要挑战来自各区域及其所在国家之间的不良关系。一些学者和倡导者主张,面对压迫的地区应有补救性分离的权利。各州是否能够对犯罪地区主张类似的“补救性驱逐”权利?如果一个地区的人民违背一个国家的意愿离开这个国家是一种“自决”行为,那么当他们违背这个国家的意愿想要留下来时,是否也是如此呢?既然取得和占有领土已不再像过去那样是国家的优先事项,各国是否可以简单地放弃事实证明过于昂贵的不受欢迎的地区- -包括前殖民地前哨?我们认为,基于国际法对帝国征服合法性的接受的传统规则,应该用一种允许在某些情况下强迫脱离,但对驱逐国施加惩罚的市场型制度加以修改。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Forced Secessions
Many of the central challenges in international law arise from bad relationships between regions and the nations in which they are located. Some scholars and advocates argue for a right of remedial secession for regions facing oppression. Should states be able to claim an analogous right of “remedial expulsion” against malefactor regions? If it is an act of “self-determination” for the people of a region to leave a nation against the nation’s wishes, is the same thing true when they wish to stay against its wishes? Since acquisition and possession of territory is no longer the national priority it once was, can nations simply let go of undesirable regions — including former colonial outposts — that are proving too expensive? We argue that the traditional rules, based on the acceptance in international law of the legitimacy of imperial conquest, should be modified with a market-type system that permits forced secession in some circumstances, but imposes a penalty on the expelling nation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信