[灌注一种新型抗癌制剂治疗浅表性膀胱癌:羟丙基纤维素培霉素乳剂与生理盐水培霉素减瘤疗效比较]。

Nihon Gan Chiryo Gakkai shi Pub Date : 1990-10-20
M Asakawa, R Yasumoto, W Sakamoto, H Yoshihara, T Iseki, T Nakatani, S Wada, T Kishimoto, M Maekawa, A Horii
{"title":"[灌注一种新型抗癌制剂治疗浅表性膀胱癌:羟丙基纤维素培霉素乳剂与生理盐水培霉素减瘤疗效比较]。","authors":"M Asakawa,&nbsp;R Yasumoto,&nbsp;W Sakamoto,&nbsp;H Yoshihara,&nbsp;T Iseki,&nbsp;T Nakatani,&nbsp;S Wada,&nbsp;T Kishimoto,&nbsp;M Maekawa,&nbsp;A Horii","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Clinical efficacy of a new preparation of peplomycin emulsion in hydroxypropylcellulosum (HPC-PEP) was studied in 26 patients to compared with that in 14 patients administered with 60 mg of PEP in 20 ml saline (S-PEP). The HPC-PEP was a mixture of 90 mg PEP suspended in 30 ml of 1% HPC. Both of preparations were retained in the bladder cavity over an hour after the instillation. Intravesical instillation was performed once for the patients with HPC-PEP, and 10 times repeatedly for the patients with S-PEP. A clinical evaluation was made on the basis of cytoscopic finding and cytology one week after the final instillation. According to the degree of tumor reduction, the results were classified into \"disappearance\", \"greater than 50% reduction,\" and \"no alteration or further growth\" of primary tumor, which were referred respectively to \"complete response (CR)\", \"partial response (PR)\" and \"not changed (NC)\". The rates of CR and response were 27 and 73% respectively for the HPC-PEP administered patients, which were significantly higher than those of 8 and 43% respectively for the patients with S-PEP. In terms of configuration and number of tumor, intravesical HPC-PEP treatment was found to be superior to intravesical S-PEP treatment. In HPC-PEP treatment, a series of untoward symptoms such as bladder irritability and leukopenia was encountered at a frequency of 8%, which is much less than those seen in the S-PEP treatment. These clinical date suggest that HPC-PEP treatment against the superficial bladder tumors is superior to conventional S-PEP instillation in terms of administration frequency and potent doses available to tumor reduction.</p>","PeriodicalId":76232,"journal":{"name":"Nihon Gan Chiryo Gakkai shi","volume":"25 10","pages":"2579-83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Instillation of a new anticancer preparation for the treatment of superficial bladder cancer: comparison of clinical efficacy between peplomycin emulsion in hydroxypropylcellulosum and peplomycin in saline solution on tumor reduction].\",\"authors\":\"M Asakawa,&nbsp;R Yasumoto,&nbsp;W Sakamoto,&nbsp;H Yoshihara,&nbsp;T Iseki,&nbsp;T Nakatani,&nbsp;S Wada,&nbsp;T Kishimoto,&nbsp;M Maekawa,&nbsp;A Horii\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Clinical efficacy of a new preparation of peplomycin emulsion in hydroxypropylcellulosum (HPC-PEP) was studied in 26 patients to compared with that in 14 patients administered with 60 mg of PEP in 20 ml saline (S-PEP). The HPC-PEP was a mixture of 90 mg PEP suspended in 30 ml of 1% HPC. Both of preparations were retained in the bladder cavity over an hour after the instillation. Intravesical instillation was performed once for the patients with HPC-PEP, and 10 times repeatedly for the patients with S-PEP. A clinical evaluation was made on the basis of cytoscopic finding and cytology one week after the final instillation. According to the degree of tumor reduction, the results were classified into \\\"disappearance\\\", \\\"greater than 50% reduction,\\\" and \\\"no alteration or further growth\\\" of primary tumor, which were referred respectively to \\\"complete response (CR)\\\", \\\"partial response (PR)\\\" and \\\"not changed (NC)\\\". The rates of CR and response were 27 and 73% respectively for the HPC-PEP administered patients, which were significantly higher than those of 8 and 43% respectively for the patients with S-PEP. In terms of configuration and number of tumor, intravesical HPC-PEP treatment was found to be superior to intravesical S-PEP treatment. In HPC-PEP treatment, a series of untoward symptoms such as bladder irritability and leukopenia was encountered at a frequency of 8%, which is much less than those seen in the S-PEP treatment. These clinical date suggest that HPC-PEP treatment against the superficial bladder tumors is superior to conventional S-PEP instillation in terms of administration frequency and potent doses available to tumor reduction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nihon Gan Chiryo Gakkai shi\",\"volume\":\"25 10\",\"pages\":\"2579-83\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nihon Gan Chiryo Gakkai shi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nihon Gan Chiryo Gakkai shi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究了新型羟丙基纤维素培霉素乳剂(HPC-PEP)在26例患者中的临床疗效,并与用60 mg PEP在20 ml生理盐水中(S-PEP)给药的14例患者进行了比较。HPC-PEP为90 mg PEP悬浮于30 ml 1% HPC的混合物。两种制剂在输注后均在膀胱腔内保留超过1小时。HPC-PEP患者膀胱内滴注1次,S-PEP患者膀胱内滴注10次。最后滴注一周后,根据细胞镜检查和细胞学检查进行临床评价。根据肿瘤缩小程度,将结果分为原发肿瘤“消失”、“缩小50%以上”、“无改变或进一步生长”,分别称为“完全缓解(CR)”、“部分缓解(PR)”和“未改变(NC)”。HPC-PEP组患者的CR率和有效率分别为27%和73%,显著高于S-PEP组的8%和43%。在形态和肿瘤数量方面,膀胱内HPC-PEP治疗优于膀胱内S-PEP治疗。在HPC-PEP治疗中,出现膀胱烦躁、白细胞减少等一系列不良症状的频率为8%,远低于S-PEP治疗。这些临床数据表明,在给药频率和有效剂量方面,HPC-PEP治疗浅表性膀胱肿瘤优于传统的S-PEP灌注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Instillation of a new anticancer preparation for the treatment of superficial bladder cancer: comparison of clinical efficacy between peplomycin emulsion in hydroxypropylcellulosum and peplomycin in saline solution on tumor reduction].

Clinical efficacy of a new preparation of peplomycin emulsion in hydroxypropylcellulosum (HPC-PEP) was studied in 26 patients to compared with that in 14 patients administered with 60 mg of PEP in 20 ml saline (S-PEP). The HPC-PEP was a mixture of 90 mg PEP suspended in 30 ml of 1% HPC. Both of preparations were retained in the bladder cavity over an hour after the instillation. Intravesical instillation was performed once for the patients with HPC-PEP, and 10 times repeatedly for the patients with S-PEP. A clinical evaluation was made on the basis of cytoscopic finding and cytology one week after the final instillation. According to the degree of tumor reduction, the results were classified into "disappearance", "greater than 50% reduction," and "no alteration or further growth" of primary tumor, which were referred respectively to "complete response (CR)", "partial response (PR)" and "not changed (NC)". The rates of CR and response were 27 and 73% respectively for the HPC-PEP administered patients, which were significantly higher than those of 8 and 43% respectively for the patients with S-PEP. In terms of configuration and number of tumor, intravesical HPC-PEP treatment was found to be superior to intravesical S-PEP treatment. In HPC-PEP treatment, a series of untoward symptoms such as bladder irritability and leukopenia was encountered at a frequency of 8%, which is much less than those seen in the S-PEP treatment. These clinical date suggest that HPC-PEP treatment against the superficial bladder tumors is superior to conventional S-PEP instillation in terms of administration frequency and potent doses available to tumor reduction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信