{"title":"第一波COVID-19期间体外膜氧合治疗流感与COVID-19的结果","authors":"C. Blazoski, M. Baram, H. Hirose","doi":"10.1164/AJRCCM-CONFERENCE.2021.203.1_MEETINGABSTRACTS.A2542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a refractory\ntreatment for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to\ninfluenza and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2\n(SARS-CoV-2, also referred to as COVID-19). We conducted this study to\ncompare the outcomes of influenza patients treated with veno-venous-ECMO\n(VV-ECMO) to COVID-19 patients treated with VV-ECMO, during the first\nwave of COVID-19. Materials and Methods: Patients in our institution\nwith ARDS due to COVID-19 or influenza who were placed on ECMO between\nAugust 1, 2010 and September 15, 2020 were included in this comparative,\nretrospective study. To improve homogeneity, only VV -ECMO patients were\nanalyzed. The clinical characteristics and outcomes were extracted and\nanalyzed. Results: 28 COVID-19 patients and 17 influenza patients were\nidentified and included. ECMO survival rates were 68% (19/28) in\nCOVID-19 patients and 94% (16/17) in influenza patients (p=0.04).\n30-day survival rates after ECMO decannulation were 54% (15/28) in\nCOVID-19 patients and 76% (13/17) in influenza patients (p=0.13).\nCOVID-19 patients spent a longer time on ECMO compared to flu patients\n(21 days vs. 12 days, p=0.025), and more COVID-19 patients (26/28 vs.\n2/17) were on immunomodulatory therapy prior to ECMO initiation\n(p<0.001). COVID-19 patients had higher rates of new\ninfections during ECMO (50% vs. 18%, p=0.03) and bacterial pneumonia\n(36% vs 6%, p=0.024). Conclusions: COVID-19 patients who were treated\nin our institution with VV-ECMO had statistically lower ECMO survival\nrates than influenza patients. It is possible that COVID-19\nimmunomodulation therapies may increase the risk of other superimposed\ninfections.","PeriodicalId":111156,"journal":{"name":"TP49. TP049 COVID: ARDS AND ICU MANAGEMENT","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Influenza vs. COVID-19 During the First Wave of COVID-19\",\"authors\":\"C. Blazoski, M. Baram, H. Hirose\",\"doi\":\"10.1164/AJRCCM-CONFERENCE.2021.203.1_MEETINGABSTRACTS.A2542\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a refractory\\ntreatment for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to\\ninfluenza and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2\\n(SARS-CoV-2, also referred to as COVID-19). We conducted this study to\\ncompare the outcomes of influenza patients treated with veno-venous-ECMO\\n(VV-ECMO) to COVID-19 patients treated with VV-ECMO, during the first\\nwave of COVID-19. Materials and Methods: Patients in our institution\\nwith ARDS due to COVID-19 or influenza who were placed on ECMO between\\nAugust 1, 2010 and September 15, 2020 were included in this comparative,\\nretrospective study. To improve homogeneity, only VV -ECMO patients were\\nanalyzed. The clinical characteristics and outcomes were extracted and\\nanalyzed. Results: 28 COVID-19 patients and 17 influenza patients were\\nidentified and included. ECMO survival rates were 68% (19/28) in\\nCOVID-19 patients and 94% (16/17) in influenza patients (p=0.04).\\n30-day survival rates after ECMO decannulation were 54% (15/28) in\\nCOVID-19 patients and 76% (13/17) in influenza patients (p=0.13).\\nCOVID-19 patients spent a longer time on ECMO compared to flu patients\\n(21 days vs. 12 days, p=0.025), and more COVID-19 patients (26/28 vs.\\n2/17) were on immunomodulatory therapy prior to ECMO initiation\\n(p<0.001). COVID-19 patients had higher rates of new\\ninfections during ECMO (50% vs. 18%, p=0.03) and bacterial pneumonia\\n(36% vs 6%, p=0.024). Conclusions: COVID-19 patients who were treated\\nin our institution with VV-ECMO had statistically lower ECMO survival\\nrates than influenza patients. It is possible that COVID-19\\nimmunomodulation therapies may increase the risk of other superimposed\\ninfections.\",\"PeriodicalId\":111156,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"TP49. TP049 COVID: ARDS AND ICU MANAGEMENT\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"TP49. TP049 COVID: ARDS AND ICU MANAGEMENT\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1164/AJRCCM-CONFERENCE.2021.203.1_MEETINGABSTRACTS.A2542\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TP49. TP049 COVID: ARDS AND ICU MANAGEMENT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1164/AJRCCM-CONFERENCE.2021.203.1_MEETINGABSTRACTS.A2542","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Outcomes of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Influenza vs. COVID-19 During the First Wave of COVID-19
Purpose: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a refractory
treatment for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to
influenza and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
(SARS-CoV-2, also referred to as COVID-19). We conducted this study to
compare the outcomes of influenza patients treated with veno-venous-ECMO
(VV-ECMO) to COVID-19 patients treated with VV-ECMO, during the first
wave of COVID-19. Materials and Methods: Patients in our institution
with ARDS due to COVID-19 or influenza who were placed on ECMO between
August 1, 2010 and September 15, 2020 were included in this comparative,
retrospective study. To improve homogeneity, only VV -ECMO patients were
analyzed. The clinical characteristics and outcomes were extracted and
analyzed. Results: 28 COVID-19 patients and 17 influenza patients were
identified and included. ECMO survival rates were 68% (19/28) in
COVID-19 patients and 94% (16/17) in influenza patients (p=0.04).
30-day survival rates after ECMO decannulation were 54% (15/28) in
COVID-19 patients and 76% (13/17) in influenza patients (p=0.13).
COVID-19 patients spent a longer time on ECMO compared to flu patients
(21 days vs. 12 days, p=0.025), and more COVID-19 patients (26/28 vs.
2/17) were on immunomodulatory therapy prior to ECMO initiation
(p<0.001). COVID-19 patients had higher rates of new
infections during ECMO (50% vs. 18%, p=0.03) and bacterial pneumonia
(36% vs 6%, p=0.024). Conclusions: COVID-19 patients who were treated
in our institution with VV-ECMO had statistically lower ECMO survival
rates than influenza patients. It is possible that COVID-19
immunomodulation therapies may increase the risk of other superimposed
infections.