可预测、灵活或正确:权衡重构设计选择

A. M. Eilertsen
{"title":"可预测、灵活或正确:权衡重构设计选择","authors":"A. M. Eilertsen","doi":"10.1145/3387940.3392185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Refactoring tools automate tedious and error-prone source code changes. Such tools can improve the speed and accuracy of software development, yet developers frequently eschew automation in favor of manual refactoring. Developers report distrust and lack of predictability as reasons for not using automated tools, but there are no comprehensive explanations of trust and predictability nor guidelines for how to improve these aspects of tools. In this position paper we explore choices and tradeoffs in refactoring tool design.","PeriodicalId":309659,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM 42nd International Conference on Software Engineering Workshops","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictable, Flexible or Correct: Trading off Refactoring Design Choices\",\"authors\":\"A. M. Eilertsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3387940.3392185\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Refactoring tools automate tedious and error-prone source code changes. Such tools can improve the speed and accuracy of software development, yet developers frequently eschew automation in favor of manual refactoring. Developers report distrust and lack of predictability as reasons for not using automated tools, but there are no comprehensive explanations of trust and predictability nor guidelines for how to improve these aspects of tools. In this position paper we explore choices and tradeoffs in refactoring tool design.\",\"PeriodicalId\":309659,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM 42nd International Conference on Software Engineering Workshops\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM 42nd International Conference on Software Engineering Workshops\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3387940.3392185\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM 42nd International Conference on Software Engineering Workshops","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3387940.3392185","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

重构工具会自动执行繁琐且容易出错的源代码更改。这样的工具可以提高软件开发的速度和准确性,但是开发人员经常避免自动化,而倾向于手动重构。开发人员报告说不信任和缺乏可预测性是不使用自动化工具的原因,但是没有关于信任和可预测性的全面解释,也没有关于如何改进工具这些方面的指导方针。在本文中,我们将探讨重构工具设计中的选择和权衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predictable, Flexible or Correct: Trading off Refactoring Design Choices
Refactoring tools automate tedious and error-prone source code changes. Such tools can improve the speed and accuracy of software development, yet developers frequently eschew automation in favor of manual refactoring. Developers report distrust and lack of predictability as reasons for not using automated tools, but there are no comprehensive explanations of trust and predictability nor guidelines for how to improve these aspects of tools. In this position paper we explore choices and tradeoffs in refactoring tool design.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信