论加强对诬告的法定处罚

Chan-Geol Park
{"title":"论加强对诬告的法定处罚","authors":"Chan-Geol Park","doi":"10.34267/cblj.2023.34.1.115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For the reason that it is difficult to admit inner side of a criminal offender as evidence and it is not easy to sentence the accused in prison in confessed cases as it is needed to reduce the sentence as necessary in case the accused makes confession in false accusation, the fact remains that sentence against false accusation has been standardized so far. Eventually, to restrain indiscriminate accusation·complaint and promote proper exercise of state penal power, it is necessary to extend application scope of false accusation and strengthen punishment, but it is also necessary to place strict restrictions on application scope of false accusation to prevent unwarranted invasion by guaranteeing rights of victims of crime to file a suit·complaint still exists. As various improvement plans for overcoming the above circumstances, it is time to examine plans to increase statutory punishment on the criminal law against false accusation in all cases against brutal crimes such as homicide·robbery·rape etc., punish respective crime such as false accusation with sentence on the existing National Security Law, delete monetary penalty as an optional punishment from the statutory punishment against false accusation and establish mandatory minimums considering that false accusation about crimes regulated by the Act on Aggravated Punishment of Specific Crimes is to be sentenced to more than three years in prison as compared to general criminal law. Meanwhile, due to the high degree of social blame against suspect sexual assault cases, victims of false accusation of sexual assault have fears of encountering more serious damage comparing to the victims of general false accusation cases. Despite a person getting false charge did nothing of the kind, it is true that people around him or her look on the person with prejudiced eyes as if he or she did something deserve criminal punishment or disciplinary action. Keeping victims of sexual violence from being falsely charged is important, of course, but protecting suspects charged without sexual violence is urgently needed as well. Thus, examining whether to establish a special clause such as punishing severely as compared to other false accusation is considered necessary considering characteristics of false accusation about sexual crimes if suspicion of false accusation is substantiated. Based on the critical mind, this manuscript aims to arouse caution against false accusation through severe punishment against offenders hindering judicial order, and seek individualization of treatment that reflects individual characteristics of false accusers.","PeriodicalId":307875,"journal":{"name":"LAW RESEARCH INSTITUTE CHUNGBUK NATIONAL UNIVERSITY","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Examination on the Enhancement of Statutory Punishment against False Accusation\",\"authors\":\"Chan-Geol Park\",\"doi\":\"10.34267/cblj.2023.34.1.115\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For the reason that it is difficult to admit inner side of a criminal offender as evidence and it is not easy to sentence the accused in prison in confessed cases as it is needed to reduce the sentence as necessary in case the accused makes confession in false accusation, the fact remains that sentence against false accusation has been standardized so far. Eventually, to restrain indiscriminate accusation·complaint and promote proper exercise of state penal power, it is necessary to extend application scope of false accusation and strengthen punishment, but it is also necessary to place strict restrictions on application scope of false accusation to prevent unwarranted invasion by guaranteeing rights of victims of crime to file a suit·complaint still exists. As various improvement plans for overcoming the above circumstances, it is time to examine plans to increase statutory punishment on the criminal law against false accusation in all cases against brutal crimes such as homicide·robbery·rape etc., punish respective crime such as false accusation with sentence on the existing National Security Law, delete monetary penalty as an optional punishment from the statutory punishment against false accusation and establish mandatory minimums considering that false accusation about crimes regulated by the Act on Aggravated Punishment of Specific Crimes is to be sentenced to more than three years in prison as compared to general criminal law. Meanwhile, due to the high degree of social blame against suspect sexual assault cases, victims of false accusation of sexual assault have fears of encountering more serious damage comparing to the victims of general false accusation cases. Despite a person getting false charge did nothing of the kind, it is true that people around him or her look on the person with prejudiced eyes as if he or she did something deserve criminal punishment or disciplinary action. Keeping victims of sexual violence from being falsely charged is important, of course, but protecting suspects charged without sexual violence is urgently needed as well. Thus, examining whether to establish a special clause such as punishing severely as compared to other false accusation is considered necessary considering characteristics of false accusation about sexual crimes if suspicion of false accusation is substantiated. Based on the critical mind, this manuscript aims to arouse caution against false accusation through severe punishment against offenders hindering judicial order, and seek individualization of treatment that reflects individual characteristics of false accusers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":307875,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LAW RESEARCH INSTITUTE CHUNGBUK NATIONAL UNIVERSITY\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LAW RESEARCH INSTITUTE CHUNGBUK NATIONAL UNIVERSITY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34267/cblj.2023.34.1.115\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LAW RESEARCH INSTITUTE CHUNGBUK NATIONAL UNIVERSITY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34267/cblj.2023.34.1.115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于很难将罪犯的内心作为证据,而且在认罪案件中,如果被告在诬告中认罪,需要根据需要减刑,因此不容易判处被告入狱,因此迄今为止,对诬告的量刑一直是标准化的。最终,为了遏制乱控告、促进国家刑事权力的正确行使,既需要扩大诬告的适用范围、加强处罚力度,又需要严格限制诬告的适用范围,通过保障犯罪被害人的诉讼申诉权利来防止无端侵犯。作为克服上述情况的各种改善方案,有必要研究在杀人、抢劫、强奸等野蛮犯罪的所有案件中,增加刑法对诬告的法定处罚,在现行《国家安全法》上对诬告等个别犯罪进行量刑的方案。考虑到《特定犯罪加重处罚法》规定的罪行的诬告比一般刑法判处3年以上有期徒刑,应在对诬告的法定处罚中删除作为可选处罚的罚金,并规定强制性最低刑罚。同时,由于社会对涉嫌性侵案件的高度指责,性侵诬告案件的受害者比一般的诬告案件的受害者更害怕遭受更严重的伤害。被诬告的人虽然没有做过任何事情,但周围的人会用偏见的眼光看待他,好像他做了什么应该受到刑事处罚或纪律处分的事情。防止性暴力受害者被错误起诉固然重要,但保护没有性暴力的嫌疑人也很重要。因此,考虑到涉嫌诬告的性犯罪的诬告的特点,有必要研究是否设置“比其他诬告严惩”的特别条款。本文立足于批判思维,通过对妨害司法秩序的罪犯的严惩,唤起对诬告的警惕,寻求体现诬告者个体特征的个体化处理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Examination on the Enhancement of Statutory Punishment against False Accusation
For the reason that it is difficult to admit inner side of a criminal offender as evidence and it is not easy to sentence the accused in prison in confessed cases as it is needed to reduce the sentence as necessary in case the accused makes confession in false accusation, the fact remains that sentence against false accusation has been standardized so far. Eventually, to restrain indiscriminate accusation·complaint and promote proper exercise of state penal power, it is necessary to extend application scope of false accusation and strengthen punishment, but it is also necessary to place strict restrictions on application scope of false accusation to prevent unwarranted invasion by guaranteeing rights of victims of crime to file a suit·complaint still exists. As various improvement plans for overcoming the above circumstances, it is time to examine plans to increase statutory punishment on the criminal law against false accusation in all cases against brutal crimes such as homicide·robbery·rape etc., punish respective crime such as false accusation with sentence on the existing National Security Law, delete monetary penalty as an optional punishment from the statutory punishment against false accusation and establish mandatory minimums considering that false accusation about crimes regulated by the Act on Aggravated Punishment of Specific Crimes is to be sentenced to more than three years in prison as compared to general criminal law. Meanwhile, due to the high degree of social blame against suspect sexual assault cases, victims of false accusation of sexual assault have fears of encountering more serious damage comparing to the victims of general false accusation cases. Despite a person getting false charge did nothing of the kind, it is true that people around him or her look on the person with prejudiced eyes as if he or she did something deserve criminal punishment or disciplinary action. Keeping victims of sexual violence from being falsely charged is important, of course, but protecting suspects charged without sexual violence is urgently needed as well. Thus, examining whether to establish a special clause such as punishing severely as compared to other false accusation is considered necessary considering characteristics of false accusation about sexual crimes if suspicion of false accusation is substantiated. Based on the critical mind, this manuscript aims to arouse caution against false accusation through severe punishment against offenders hindering judicial order, and seek individualization of treatment that reflects individual characteristics of false accusers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信