{"title":"霍夫曼塑料化合物事件后的无证亚裔美国工人和州工资法","authors":"M. Ray","doi":"10.15779/Z383W1B","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2002, the United States Supreme Court held in Hoffman Plastic Compounds v. NLRB' that an undocumented immigrant employee who used false work-authorization documentation could not be awarded statutory back pay regarding his employment termination for lawful union activity.2 The Court's underlying premise lay in limiting the back pay remedy to be consistent with federal immigration law.3 Hoffman sent shockwaves through the immigrant rights and labor organizing community; the Court had eliminated perhaps the most effective means of encouraging employer NLRA compliance and had raised questions as to whether courts","PeriodicalId":334951,"journal":{"name":"Asian American Law Journal","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Undocumented Asian American Workers and State Wage Laws in the Aftermath of Hoffman Plastic Compounds\",\"authors\":\"M. Ray\",\"doi\":\"10.15779/Z383W1B\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 2002, the United States Supreme Court held in Hoffman Plastic Compounds v. NLRB' that an undocumented immigrant employee who used false work-authorization documentation could not be awarded statutory back pay regarding his employment termination for lawful union activity.2 The Court's underlying premise lay in limiting the back pay remedy to be consistent with federal immigration law.3 Hoffman sent shockwaves through the immigrant rights and labor organizing community; the Court had eliminated perhaps the most effective means of encouraging employer NLRA compliance and had raised questions as to whether courts\",\"PeriodicalId\":334951,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian American Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian American Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15779/Z383W1B\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian American Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15779/Z383W1B","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
2002年,美国最高法院在Hoffman Plastic Compounds v. NLRB一案中裁定,一名使用虚假工作许可文件的无证移民雇员不能就其因合法工会活动而被解雇一事获得法定补发工资法院的基本前提是限制拖欠工资的补救措施,使之符合联邦移民法霍夫曼在移民权利和劳工组织界掀起了冲击波;法院取消了也许是鼓励雇主遵守NLRA的最有效手段,并提出了法院是否
Undocumented Asian American Workers and State Wage Laws in the Aftermath of Hoffman Plastic Compounds
In 2002, the United States Supreme Court held in Hoffman Plastic Compounds v. NLRB' that an undocumented immigrant employee who used false work-authorization documentation could not be awarded statutory back pay regarding his employment termination for lawful union activity.2 The Court's underlying premise lay in limiting the back pay remedy to be consistent with federal immigration law.3 Hoffman sent shockwaves through the immigrant rights and labor organizing community; the Court had eliminated perhaps the most effective means of encouraging employer NLRA compliance and had raised questions as to whether courts