预测全球气温:错过重点?中断的后果

A. Stips, Diego Macías, E. García‐Górriz, C. Coughlan
{"title":"预测全球气温:错过重点?中断的后果","authors":"A. Stips, Diego Macías, E. García‐Górriz, C. Coughlan","doi":"10.1109/BALTIC.2014.6887827","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We use singular spectrum analysis techniques to discriminate the underlying signals within the HadCRUT4 global surface temperature record. Our analysis identifies a multidecadal oscillation (related to natural oscillations) and a secular trend (assumed to be representative of anthropogenic-induced warming) as the two main signals within the temperature record. Most current generation global circulation models (CMIP5) do not reproduce the multidecadal oscillation and fail to capture the present observed temperature hiatus in their simulations. Therefore, it is unlikely that these models can correctly forecast the temperature evolution during the coming decades. Statistical forecasts based on the analyzed secular trend and the multidecadal oscillations are indeed capable of reproducing the observed hiatus and generally result, in comparison to CMIP5 forecasts, in much lower temperature increases for 2100 of only about +0.39°C [-0.47-2.46] assuming a “business as usual” scenario. Either the global energy budget uncertainty is still too large or the increased radiative forcing does rather lead to accelerated warming of other parts of the climate system as the ocean or the cryosphere.","PeriodicalId":435850,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE/OES Baltic International Symposium (BALTIC)","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Forecasting global temperatures: Missing the point? The consequences of the hiatus\",\"authors\":\"A. Stips, Diego Macías, E. García‐Górriz, C. Coughlan\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/BALTIC.2014.6887827\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We use singular spectrum analysis techniques to discriminate the underlying signals within the HadCRUT4 global surface temperature record. Our analysis identifies a multidecadal oscillation (related to natural oscillations) and a secular trend (assumed to be representative of anthropogenic-induced warming) as the two main signals within the temperature record. Most current generation global circulation models (CMIP5) do not reproduce the multidecadal oscillation and fail to capture the present observed temperature hiatus in their simulations. Therefore, it is unlikely that these models can correctly forecast the temperature evolution during the coming decades. Statistical forecasts based on the analyzed secular trend and the multidecadal oscillations are indeed capable of reproducing the observed hiatus and generally result, in comparison to CMIP5 forecasts, in much lower temperature increases for 2100 of only about +0.39°C [-0.47-2.46] assuming a “business as usual” scenario. Either the global energy budget uncertainty is still too large or the increased radiative forcing does rather lead to accelerated warming of other parts of the climate system as the ocean or the cryosphere.\",\"PeriodicalId\":435850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 IEEE/OES Baltic International Symposium (BALTIC)\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 IEEE/OES Baltic International Symposium (BALTIC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/BALTIC.2014.6887827\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE/OES Baltic International Symposium (BALTIC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/BALTIC.2014.6887827","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们使用奇异谱分析技术来区分HadCRUT4全球地表温度记录中的潜在信号。我们的分析确定了一个多年代际振荡(与自然振荡有关)和一个长期趋势(假定代表了人为引起的变暖)是温度记录中的两个主要信号。大多数当前全球环流模式(CMIP5)不能重现多年代际振荡,也不能在其模拟中捕捉到当前观测到的温度中断。因此,这些模式不太可能正确预测未来几十年的温度演变。基于分析的长期趋势和多年代际振荡的统计预报确实能够再现观测到的中断,并且与CMIP5的预报相比,在假定“一切照常”的情况下,2100年的气温上升幅度通常要低得多,仅为+0.39°C[-0.47-2.46]。要么是全球能源收支的不确定性仍然太大,要么是辐射强迫的增加确实导致了气候系统其他部分如海洋或冰冻圈的加速变暖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Forecasting global temperatures: Missing the point? The consequences of the hiatus
We use singular spectrum analysis techniques to discriminate the underlying signals within the HadCRUT4 global surface temperature record. Our analysis identifies a multidecadal oscillation (related to natural oscillations) and a secular trend (assumed to be representative of anthropogenic-induced warming) as the two main signals within the temperature record. Most current generation global circulation models (CMIP5) do not reproduce the multidecadal oscillation and fail to capture the present observed temperature hiatus in their simulations. Therefore, it is unlikely that these models can correctly forecast the temperature evolution during the coming decades. Statistical forecasts based on the analyzed secular trend and the multidecadal oscillations are indeed capable of reproducing the observed hiatus and generally result, in comparison to CMIP5 forecasts, in much lower temperature increases for 2100 of only about +0.39°C [-0.47-2.46] assuming a “business as usual” scenario. Either the global energy budget uncertainty is still too large or the increased radiative forcing does rather lead to accelerated warming of other parts of the climate system as the ocean or the cryosphere.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信