On the Relationship Between Classes, Objects, and Data Abstraction

While most object-oriented programming is done in class-based languages, the trend in theoretical study has been to develop formal systems that are object-based, without classes and often without explicit inheritance mechanisms. This paper studies the correspondence between object primitives and class constructs of the form found in C++, Eiffel, and Java. The main qualitative insight is that such classes require both an extensible aggregate, to serve as the basis for inheritance, and a non-extensible form of object to support subtyping. We compare three approaches to modeling classes, the first using records of object components called “premethods” and the latter two using an extensible form of object called a “prototype.” While the first approach uses fewer primitive operations on objects, it does not provide several important features of class-based languages. In the latter two approaches, we overcome these deficiencies by combining prototypes with standard abstraction mechanisms. All three treatments of classes use translations into provably sound object calculi.