从需求生成特性模型:结构视角与功能视角

Nili Itzik, Iris Reinhartz-Berger
{"title":"从需求生成特性模型:结构视角与功能视角","authors":"Nili Itzik, Iris Reinhartz-Berger","doi":"10.1145/2647908.2655966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Adoption of SPLE techniques is challenging and expensive. Hence, automation in the adoption process is desirable, especially with respect to variability management. Different methods have been suggested for (semi-)automatically generating feature models from requirements or textual descriptions of products. However, while there are different ways to represent the same SPL in feature models, addressing different stakeholders' needs and preferences, existing methods usually follow fixed, predefined ways to generate feature models. As a result, the generated feature models may represent perspectives less relevant to the given tasks.\n In this paper we suggest an ontological approach that measures the semantic similarity, extracts variability, and automatically generates feature models that represent structural (objects-related) or functional (actions-related) perspectives. The stakeholders are able to control the perspective of the generated feature models, considering their needs and preferences for given tasks.","PeriodicalId":339444,"journal":{"name":"Software Product Lines Conference","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"27","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Generating feature models from requirements: structural vs. functional perspectives\",\"authors\":\"Nili Itzik, Iris Reinhartz-Berger\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2647908.2655966\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Adoption of SPLE techniques is challenging and expensive. Hence, automation in the adoption process is desirable, especially with respect to variability management. Different methods have been suggested for (semi-)automatically generating feature models from requirements or textual descriptions of products. However, while there are different ways to represent the same SPL in feature models, addressing different stakeholders' needs and preferences, existing methods usually follow fixed, predefined ways to generate feature models. As a result, the generated feature models may represent perspectives less relevant to the given tasks.\\n In this paper we suggest an ontological approach that measures the semantic similarity, extracts variability, and automatically generates feature models that represent structural (objects-related) or functional (actions-related) perspectives. The stakeholders are able to control the perspective of the generated feature models, considering their needs and preferences for given tasks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":339444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Software Product Lines Conference\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"27\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Software Product Lines Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2647908.2655966\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Software Product Lines Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2647908.2655966","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

摘要

采用SPLE技术是具有挑战性和昂贵的。因此,采用过程中的自动化是可取的,特别是在可变性管理方面。从产品的需求或文本描述中(半)自动生成特征模型的方法已经被提出。然而,尽管在特征模型中有不同的方法来表示相同的SPL,以满足不同涉众的需求和偏好,但现有的方法通常遵循固定的、预定义的方法来生成特征模型。因此,生成的特征模型可能表示与给定任务不太相关的透视图。在本文中,我们提出了一种本体论方法,该方法测量语义相似性,提取可变性,并自动生成表示结构(与对象相关)或功能(与动作相关)视角的特征模型。涉众能够控制生成的特征模型的透视图,考虑他们对给定任务的需求和偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Generating feature models from requirements: structural vs. functional perspectives
Adoption of SPLE techniques is challenging and expensive. Hence, automation in the adoption process is desirable, especially with respect to variability management. Different methods have been suggested for (semi-)automatically generating feature models from requirements or textual descriptions of products. However, while there are different ways to represent the same SPL in feature models, addressing different stakeholders' needs and preferences, existing methods usually follow fixed, predefined ways to generate feature models. As a result, the generated feature models may represent perspectives less relevant to the given tasks. In this paper we suggest an ontological approach that measures the semantic similarity, extracts variability, and automatically generates feature models that represent structural (objects-related) or functional (actions-related) perspectives. The stakeholders are able to control the perspective of the generated feature models, considering their needs and preferences for given tasks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信