Svitlana Volodymyrivna Kyselytsia
{"title":"ГРОМАДСЬКА ДУМКА ЯК МОРАЛЬНО-ПОЛІТИЧНИЙ РЕГУЛЯТИВ ЛЮДСЬКОГО БУТТЯ","authors":"Svitlana Volodymyrivna Kyselytsia","doi":"10.25140/2412-1185-2019-2(14)-42-51","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Urgency of the research. Effective influence on the surrounding world is the most important problem of human society.\nTarget setting. The study of public opinion in the context of the personal and national centrifugality of recent decades, manifested in the struggle for the dominance of one or another communication paradigm is of particular relevance.\nActual scientific researches and issues analysis. The interpenetration of morality and politics inevitably leads to extreme tension in the humanitarian sciences due to the intersection here of the irrational-sensual (social psychology, anthropology, ethnology) and rational-volitional (political science, sociology, ethics) spheres associated with the formation of self-consciousness and the creation of civilized forms of communication.\nUninvestigated parts of general matters defining. The combination of various interests is always a test for politics as the art of the possible and for morality as the mental basis of human existence.\nThe research objective. The purpose of the article is to analyze the communicative and regulatory specifics of public opinion.\nThe statement of basic materials. A person in the process of socialization, simultaneously existing in a contradictory uniquely universal dimensions, tries to comprehend the possibilities of personal influence on the environment. The author uses methods of observation, questioning, idealization, modeling and comparative analysis. The main hypothesis is that the mentality of people forms the power and through public opinion (the dominant worldview algorithms in the mass consciousness) influences the politics.\nConclusions. Public opinion is the only reliable mediator or productive compromise between morality and politics, guaranteeing the harmonious coexistence of power and people in a promising society. The more consolidated position the people demonstrate, the more controllable and civilized (moral) the power is, the more flexible the power, the more politically literate the people become and, as a result, the civil consciousness is formed.","PeriodicalId":153552,"journal":{"name":"SOCIAL WORK ISSUES: PHILOSOPHY, PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIOLOGY","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SOCIAL WORK ISSUES: PHILOSOPHY, PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25140/2412-1185-2019-2(14)-42-51","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究的紧迫性。对周围世界的有效影响是人类社会最重要的问题。目标设置。在最近几十年个人和国家离心离德的背景下研究公众舆论,这种离心离德表现在争夺一种或另一种传播范式的主导地位的斗争中,这是特别相关的。实际科学研究和问题分析。道德和政治的相互渗透不可避免地导致了人道主义科学的极端紧张,因为在这里,与自我意识的形成和文明交流形式的创造相关的非理性-感性(社会心理学、人类学、民族学)和理性-意志(政治学、社会学、伦理学)领域的交叉。一般事物定义的未调查部分。各种利益的结合始终是对作为可能的艺术的政治和作为人类生存的精神基础的道德的考验。研究目的。本文的目的是分析舆论的传播和监管细节。基本物质表。一个人在社会化的过程中,同时存在于一个矛盾的独特的普遍维度中,试图理解个人对环境影响的可能性。作者采用观察法、提问法、理想化法、建模法和比较分析法。主要假设是人们的心态形成权力,并通过民意(大众意识中占主导地位的世界观算法)影响政治。民意是道德与政治之间唯一可靠的中介或富有成效的妥协,保证了一个有希望的社会中权力与人民的和谐共处。人民的地位越稳固,权力就越可控、越文明(道德),权力就越灵活,人民的政治素养就越高,公民意识就形成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ГРОМАДСЬКА ДУМКА ЯК МОРАЛЬНО-ПОЛІТИЧНИЙ РЕГУЛЯТИВ ЛЮДСЬКОГО БУТТЯ
Urgency of the research. Effective influence on the surrounding world is the most important problem of human society. Target setting. The study of public opinion in the context of the personal and national centrifugality of recent decades, manifested in the struggle for the dominance of one or another communication paradigm is of particular relevance. Actual scientific researches and issues analysis. The interpenetration of morality and politics inevitably leads to extreme tension in the humanitarian sciences due to the intersection here of the irrational-sensual (social psychology, anthropology, ethnology) and rational-volitional (political science, sociology, ethics) spheres associated with the formation of self-consciousness and the creation of civilized forms of communication. Uninvestigated parts of general matters defining. The combination of various interests is always a test for politics as the art of the possible and for morality as the mental basis of human existence. The research objective. The purpose of the article is to analyze the communicative and regulatory specifics of public opinion. The statement of basic materials. A person in the process of socialization, simultaneously existing in a contradictory uniquely universal dimensions, tries to comprehend the possibilities of personal influence on the environment. The author uses methods of observation, questioning, idealization, modeling and comparative analysis. The main hypothesis is that the mentality of people forms the power and through public opinion (the dominant worldview algorithms in the mass consciousness) influences the politics. Conclusions. Public opinion is the only reliable mediator or productive compromise between morality and politics, guaranteeing the harmonious coexistence of power and people in a promising society. The more consolidated position the people demonstrate, the more controllable and civilized (moral) the power is, the more flexible the power, the more politically literate the people become and, as a result, the civil consciousness is formed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信