{"title":"欧盟及其候选国的相互关系问题以及作为恢复扩大政策的一种可能方式的灵活加入","authors":"Ivana Radic-Milosavljevic","doi":"10.2298/MEDJP1901005R","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with the problem of the Western Balkans countries?\n accession and association process impasse. The author finds the key causes\n of this problem in the very nature of an asymmetric relationship between the\n EU and these countries with the Stabilization and Association Process laying\n in its core. Both sides have contributed to this problem: the EU with its\n overambitious approach to the region, vaguely defined and ever-changing\n criteria, but also the countries participating in the Process with their\n uncritical approach to the possible membership, unclearly defined interests\n and aims, slow reforms, and weak democratic tradition. For the process to be\n successfully continued, the author discusses the idea of its substantial\n remodeling towards a flexible process. In light of the frequent discussions\n about the possible moving of the European integration towards more\n differentiation, the process of flexible association or accession would\n enable EU membership only in selected policy areas. The policy areas would\n be chosen in accordance with the previously clearly defined and thoroughly\n analyzed interests and capabilities of the candidate and potential candidate\n countries. The author argues that the association/accession process should\n be separated as much as possible from the political conditioning in order to\n decrease the possibility of taking arbitrary decisions on whether the\n countries have advanced in the process or not. For the Western Balkan\n countries, this kind of less demanding process would be easier to accomplish\n and would allow more autonomy in choosing areas of integration and pace of\n accommodation. For the EU member states, it would provide a way to regain\n the credibility of its once most successful foreign policy activity.","PeriodicalId":316095,"journal":{"name":"Medjunarodni problemi","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Problems of the European union and its candidate countries’ mutual relations and flexible accession as a possible way of reviving the enlargement policy\",\"authors\":\"Ivana Radic-Milosavljevic\",\"doi\":\"10.2298/MEDJP1901005R\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article deals with the problem of the Western Balkans countries?\\n accession and association process impasse. The author finds the key causes\\n of this problem in the very nature of an asymmetric relationship between the\\n EU and these countries with the Stabilization and Association Process laying\\n in its core. Both sides have contributed to this problem: the EU with its\\n overambitious approach to the region, vaguely defined and ever-changing\\n criteria, but also the countries participating in the Process with their\\n uncritical approach to the possible membership, unclearly defined interests\\n and aims, slow reforms, and weak democratic tradition. For the process to be\\n successfully continued, the author discusses the idea of its substantial\\n remodeling towards a flexible process. In light of the frequent discussions\\n about the possible moving of the European integration towards more\\n differentiation, the process of flexible association or accession would\\n enable EU membership only in selected policy areas. The policy areas would\\n be chosen in accordance with the previously clearly defined and thoroughly\\n analyzed interests and capabilities of the candidate and potential candidate\\n countries. The author argues that the association/accession process should\\n be separated as much as possible from the political conditioning in order to\\n decrease the possibility of taking arbitrary decisions on whether the\\n countries have advanced in the process or not. For the Western Balkan\\n countries, this kind of less demanding process would be easier to accomplish\\n and would allow more autonomy in choosing areas of integration and pace of\\n accommodation. For the EU member states, it would provide a way to regain\\n the credibility of its once most successful foreign policy activity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":316095,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medjunarodni problemi\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medjunarodni problemi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2298/MEDJP1901005R\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medjunarodni problemi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/MEDJP1901005R","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Problems of the European union and its candidate countries’ mutual relations and flexible accession as a possible way of reviving the enlargement policy
The article deals with the problem of the Western Balkans countries?
accession and association process impasse. The author finds the key causes
of this problem in the very nature of an asymmetric relationship between the
EU and these countries with the Stabilization and Association Process laying
in its core. Both sides have contributed to this problem: the EU with its
overambitious approach to the region, vaguely defined and ever-changing
criteria, but also the countries participating in the Process with their
uncritical approach to the possible membership, unclearly defined interests
and aims, slow reforms, and weak democratic tradition. For the process to be
successfully continued, the author discusses the idea of its substantial
remodeling towards a flexible process. In light of the frequent discussions
about the possible moving of the European integration towards more
differentiation, the process of flexible association or accession would
enable EU membership only in selected policy areas. The policy areas would
be chosen in accordance with the previously clearly defined and thoroughly
analyzed interests and capabilities of the candidate and potential candidate
countries. The author argues that the association/accession process should
be separated as much as possible from the political conditioning in order to
decrease the possibility of taking arbitrary decisions on whether the
countries have advanced in the process or not. For the Western Balkan
countries, this kind of less demanding process would be easier to accomplish
and would allow more autonomy in choosing areas of integration and pace of
accommodation. For the EU member states, it would provide a way to regain
the credibility of its once most successful foreign policy activity.