{"title":"自我分化作为心智化能力的预测因子","authors":"Marija Todosijević, Dijana Kojić","doi":"10.46630/gpsi.19.2022.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this research was to explore if the differentiation of self has a role in predicting capacity for mentalization in female samples. The data was collected using The Reflective Functioning Questionnaire (RFQ) and The Differentiation of Self Inventory (DSI) on a sample of 105 female participants, aged 18-50 years (M = 30.61, SD = 8.09). Both models containing self-differentiation as predictors were significant. The first model that predicted certainty about mental states explains 32.1% of the variance (R² = .32, F(6,98) = 7.732, p = .000), with I position (β = .459, p = .000) and emotional cutoff (β = -.245, p = .024) as significant predictors. The second model that predicted uncertainty about mental states explains 40.4% of the variance (R² = .40, F(6,98) = 11.086, p = .000), with age (β = .233, p = .007), education (β = -.208, p = .024), and emotional reactivity (β = .323, p = .005) as significant predictors. The obtained results indicate that different aspects of the differentiation of self can predict certainty and uncertainty about mental states in the female sample, but also that when it comes to phenomenon such as capacity for mentalization, certain sociodemographic variables (e.g., age, education) might play more important role then it was previously thought. Further research on this matter, with a bigger and more diverse sample, is strongly advised. Keywords: mentalization, self-differentiation, emotional reactivity, emotional cutoff","PeriodicalId":272628,"journal":{"name":"ГОДИШЊАК ЗА ПСИХОЛОГИЈУ","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DIFFERENTIATION OF SELF AS A PREDICTOR OF CAPACITY FOR MENTALIZATION\",\"authors\":\"Marija Todosijević, Dijana Kojić\",\"doi\":\"10.46630/gpsi.19.2022.04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this research was to explore if the differentiation of self has a role in predicting capacity for mentalization in female samples. The data was collected using The Reflective Functioning Questionnaire (RFQ) and The Differentiation of Self Inventory (DSI) on a sample of 105 female participants, aged 18-50 years (M = 30.61, SD = 8.09). Both models containing self-differentiation as predictors were significant. The first model that predicted certainty about mental states explains 32.1% of the variance (R² = .32, F(6,98) = 7.732, p = .000), with I position (β = .459, p = .000) and emotional cutoff (β = -.245, p = .024) as significant predictors. The second model that predicted uncertainty about mental states explains 40.4% of the variance (R² = .40, F(6,98) = 11.086, p = .000), with age (β = .233, p = .007), education (β = -.208, p = .024), and emotional reactivity (β = .323, p = .005) as significant predictors. The obtained results indicate that different aspects of the differentiation of self can predict certainty and uncertainty about mental states in the female sample, but also that when it comes to phenomenon such as capacity for mentalization, certain sociodemographic variables (e.g., age, education) might play more important role then it was previously thought. Further research on this matter, with a bigger and more diverse sample, is strongly advised. Keywords: mentalization, self-differentiation, emotional reactivity, emotional cutoff\",\"PeriodicalId\":272628,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ГОДИШЊАК ЗА ПСИХОЛОГИЈУ\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ГОДИШЊАК ЗА ПСИХОЛОГИЈУ\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46630/gpsi.19.2022.04\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ГОДИШЊАК ЗА ПСИХОЛОГИЈУ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46630/gpsi.19.2022.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究的目的是探讨自我分化是否在预测女性心智化能力中起作用。采用反思性功能问卷(RFQ)和自我分异量表(DSI)对105名18-50岁的女性(M = 30.61, SD = 8.09)进行数据收集。包含自分化作为预测因子的两个模型都是显著的。第一个预测心理状态确定性的模型解释了32.1%的方差(R²= 0.32,F(6,98) = 7.732, p = .000),其中I位置(β = .459, p = .000)和情感截止(β = -)。245, p = 0.024)为显著预测因子。第二个预测心理状态不确定性的模型解释了40.4%的方差(R²= 0.40,F(6,98) = 11.086, p = .000),年龄(β = .233, p = .007),教育(β = -。208, p = 0.024)和情绪反应(β = 0.323, p = 0.005)为显著预测因子。所获得的结果表明,自我分化的不同方面可以预测女性样本中心理状态的确定性和不确定性,但也表明,当涉及到心理化能力等现象时,某些社会人口变量(如年龄、教育)可能比之前认为的更重要。强烈建议对这一问题进行更大、更多样化的进一步研究。关键词:心智化,自我分化,情绪反应,情绪切断
DIFFERENTIATION OF SELF AS A PREDICTOR OF CAPACITY FOR MENTALIZATION
The purpose of this research was to explore if the differentiation of self has a role in predicting capacity for mentalization in female samples. The data was collected using The Reflective Functioning Questionnaire (RFQ) and The Differentiation of Self Inventory (DSI) on a sample of 105 female participants, aged 18-50 years (M = 30.61, SD = 8.09). Both models containing self-differentiation as predictors were significant. The first model that predicted certainty about mental states explains 32.1% of the variance (R² = .32, F(6,98) = 7.732, p = .000), with I position (β = .459, p = .000) and emotional cutoff (β = -.245, p = .024) as significant predictors. The second model that predicted uncertainty about mental states explains 40.4% of the variance (R² = .40, F(6,98) = 11.086, p = .000), with age (β = .233, p = .007), education (β = -.208, p = .024), and emotional reactivity (β = .323, p = .005) as significant predictors. The obtained results indicate that different aspects of the differentiation of self can predict certainty and uncertainty about mental states in the female sample, but also that when it comes to phenomenon such as capacity for mentalization, certain sociodemographic variables (e.g., age, education) might play more important role then it was previously thought. Further research on this matter, with a bigger and more diverse sample, is strongly advised. Keywords: mentalization, self-differentiation, emotional reactivity, emotional cutoff