使用动态步态指数测试比较移动无线步态分析传感器的颈背与T4放置

B. T. Nukala, N. Shibuya, Amanda Rodriguez, J. Tsay, Tam Q. Nguyen, S. Zupancic, D. Lie
{"title":"使用动态步态指数测试比较移动无线步态分析传感器的颈背与T4放置","authors":"B. T. Nukala, N. Shibuya, Amanda Rodriguez, J. Tsay, Tam Q. Nguyen, S. Zupancic, D. Lie","doi":"10.1109/ICMU.2015.7061033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A comprehensive and quantified gait analysis is warranted for patients with balance disorders to prevent injury such as falls. We report here a custom-designed wireless-gait-analysis-sensor (WGAS) to perform functional gait analysis targeted for clinically evaluating balance disorders. We report here our first efforts to determine the optimal placements of the WGAS in normal subjects for movement differentiation, while minimizing outliers and data artifacts with improved sensor technology. Normal subjects performed a gold-standard Dynamic Gait Index (DGI) tests for fall risk assessment, while the WGAS was adhered to either the T4 or the nape area. Our WGAS consists of a 3-axis linear accelerometer and gyroscopes, and the real-time gait data was transmitted wirelessly to a nearby PC and statistical analysis was done on each of the 7 DGI test on 3 volunteers repeated five times for either placement. The data suggests T4 is the preferred WGAS placement for gait analysis.","PeriodicalId":251023,"journal":{"name":"2015 Eighth International Conference on Mobile Computing and Ubiquitous Networking (ICMU)","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing nape vs. T4 placement for a mobile Wireless Gait Analysis sensor using the Dynamic Gait Index test\",\"authors\":\"B. T. Nukala, N. Shibuya, Amanda Rodriguez, J. Tsay, Tam Q. Nguyen, S. Zupancic, D. Lie\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICMU.2015.7061033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A comprehensive and quantified gait analysis is warranted for patients with balance disorders to prevent injury such as falls. We report here a custom-designed wireless-gait-analysis-sensor (WGAS) to perform functional gait analysis targeted for clinically evaluating balance disorders. We report here our first efforts to determine the optimal placements of the WGAS in normal subjects for movement differentiation, while minimizing outliers and data artifacts with improved sensor technology. Normal subjects performed a gold-standard Dynamic Gait Index (DGI) tests for fall risk assessment, while the WGAS was adhered to either the T4 or the nape area. Our WGAS consists of a 3-axis linear accelerometer and gyroscopes, and the real-time gait data was transmitted wirelessly to a nearby PC and statistical analysis was done on each of the 7 DGI test on 3 volunteers repeated five times for either placement. The data suggests T4 is the preferred WGAS placement for gait analysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":251023,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 Eighth International Conference on Mobile Computing and Ubiquitous Networking (ICMU)\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-03-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 Eighth International Conference on Mobile Computing and Ubiquitous Networking (ICMU)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMU.2015.7061033\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 Eighth International Conference on Mobile Computing and Ubiquitous Networking (ICMU)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMU.2015.7061033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

一个全面的和量化的步态分析是必要的平衡障碍的患者,以防止伤害,如跌倒。我们在此报告了一种定制设计的无线步态分析传感器(WGAS),用于进行针对临床评估平衡障碍的功能性步态分析。我们在这里报告了我们的第一次努力,以确定WGAS在正常受试者中用于运动分化的最佳位置,同时通过改进的传感器技术最小化异常值和数据伪像。正常受试者进行金标准动态步态指数(DGI)测试以评估跌倒风险,同时将WGAS粘附在T4或颈背区域。我们的WGAS由一个3轴线性加速度计和陀螺仪组成,实时步态数据被无线传输到附近的PC上,并对3名志愿者的7 DGI测试进行统计分析,每个测试重复5次。数据表明T4是步态分析的首选WGAS位置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing nape vs. T4 placement for a mobile Wireless Gait Analysis sensor using the Dynamic Gait Index test
A comprehensive and quantified gait analysis is warranted for patients with balance disorders to prevent injury such as falls. We report here a custom-designed wireless-gait-analysis-sensor (WGAS) to perform functional gait analysis targeted for clinically evaluating balance disorders. We report here our first efforts to determine the optimal placements of the WGAS in normal subjects for movement differentiation, while minimizing outliers and data artifacts with improved sensor technology. Normal subjects performed a gold-standard Dynamic Gait Index (DGI) tests for fall risk assessment, while the WGAS was adhered to either the T4 or the nape area. Our WGAS consists of a 3-axis linear accelerometer and gyroscopes, and the real-time gait data was transmitted wirelessly to a nearby PC and statistical analysis was done on each of the 7 DGI test on 3 volunteers repeated five times for either placement. The data suggests T4 is the preferred WGAS placement for gait analysis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信