股权结构与商业银行财务绩效:坦桑尼亚两大银行的比较研究

Srinivas Madishetti
{"title":"股权结构与商业银行财务绩效:坦桑尼亚两大银行的比较研究","authors":"Srinivas Madishetti","doi":"10.5958/2319-1422.2018.00003.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study is a comparison based on performance of TwoMajor Banksof TanzaniaNMB bank with major ownership of Europeans and CRDB Bank with major ownership of Tanzanians applying t-test to investigate any significant difference between selectCAMEL ratios.The study reveals that there is a significance difference between the performances of both the banks in all the CAMEL ratios applied except Return On Assets (ROA). The NMB bank‟s performance in Capital Adequacy Ratio(CAR), Non Performance Assets ratio(NPA) and Net Interest Margin ratio(NIM) comparatively appears to be better whereas the CRDB Bank performance was comparatively higher in Operating Expenses Ratio(OER), Loan Deposit Ratio(LDR) and Return On Assets with lower variability. It signals that CRDB management is concentrating on efficient functioning of the bank as its OER is comparative lower and its LDR is higher indicating effective use of deposits to increase its ROA instead of concentrating on comparative lower performance in Capital adequacy, Asset quality (NPA) and volume of business (NIM). As against this, NMB Bank is concentrating maintaining higher capital adequacy, asset quality and higher NIM instead of efficiency in use of its resources both human and financial. This may be due to differences in ownership structures and also managerial variability. Both need to improve their performance learning each other‟s experience.","PeriodicalId":436614,"journal":{"name":"SAARJ Journal on Banking & Insurance Research","volume":"230 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ownership structure and financial performance of commercial banks: a comparative study of Twomajor banks in Tanzania\",\"authors\":\"Srinivas Madishetti\",\"doi\":\"10.5958/2319-1422.2018.00003.6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study is a comparison based on performance of TwoMajor Banksof TanzaniaNMB bank with major ownership of Europeans and CRDB Bank with major ownership of Tanzanians applying t-test to investigate any significant difference between selectCAMEL ratios.The study reveals that there is a significance difference between the performances of both the banks in all the CAMEL ratios applied except Return On Assets (ROA). The NMB bank‟s performance in Capital Adequacy Ratio(CAR), Non Performance Assets ratio(NPA) and Net Interest Margin ratio(NIM) comparatively appears to be better whereas the CRDB Bank performance was comparatively higher in Operating Expenses Ratio(OER), Loan Deposit Ratio(LDR) and Return On Assets with lower variability. It signals that CRDB management is concentrating on efficient functioning of the bank as its OER is comparative lower and its LDR is higher indicating effective use of deposits to increase its ROA instead of concentrating on comparative lower performance in Capital adequacy, Asset quality (NPA) and volume of business (NIM). As against this, NMB Bank is concentrating maintaining higher capital adequacy, asset quality and higher NIM instead of efficiency in use of its resources both human and financial. This may be due to differences in ownership structures and also managerial variability. Both need to improve their performance learning each other‟s experience.\",\"PeriodicalId\":436614,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SAARJ Journal on Banking & Insurance Research\",\"volume\":\"230 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SAARJ Journal on Banking & Insurance Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5958/2319-1422.2018.00003.6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAARJ Journal on Banking & Insurance Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5958/2319-1422.2018.00003.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究是对坦桑尼亚两大银行的业绩进行比较:欧洲人持有主要股权的坦桑尼亚银行和坦桑尼亚人持有主要股权的CRDB银行,应用t检验来调查所选camel比率之间的显着差异。研究发现,两家银行在除资产收益率(ROA)外的所有CAMEL比率上的绩效都存在显著差异。NMB银行在资本充足率(CAR)、不良资产比率(NPA)和净息差比率(NIM)方面的表现相对较好,而CRDB银行在营业费用比率(OER)、贷款存款比率(LDR)和资产收益率方面的表现相对较高,变异性较低。这表明CRDB管理层正专注于银行的有效运作,因为其OER相对较低,其LDR较高,表明有效利用存款以增加其ROA,而不是专注于资本充足率,资产质量(NPA)和业务量(NIM)的相对较低表现。与此相反,NMB银行专注于保持更高的资本充足率,资产质量和更高的NIM,而不是人力和财务资源的使用效率。这可能是由于所有权结构的差异和管理的可变性。双方都需要通过学习彼此的经验来提高自己的表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ownership structure and financial performance of commercial banks: a comparative study of Twomajor banks in Tanzania
The study is a comparison based on performance of TwoMajor Banksof TanzaniaNMB bank with major ownership of Europeans and CRDB Bank with major ownership of Tanzanians applying t-test to investigate any significant difference between selectCAMEL ratios.The study reveals that there is a significance difference between the performances of both the banks in all the CAMEL ratios applied except Return On Assets (ROA). The NMB bank‟s performance in Capital Adequacy Ratio(CAR), Non Performance Assets ratio(NPA) and Net Interest Margin ratio(NIM) comparatively appears to be better whereas the CRDB Bank performance was comparatively higher in Operating Expenses Ratio(OER), Loan Deposit Ratio(LDR) and Return On Assets with lower variability. It signals that CRDB management is concentrating on efficient functioning of the bank as its OER is comparative lower and its LDR is higher indicating effective use of deposits to increase its ROA instead of concentrating on comparative lower performance in Capital adequacy, Asset quality (NPA) and volume of business (NIM). As against this, NMB Bank is concentrating maintaining higher capital adequacy, asset quality and higher NIM instead of efficiency in use of its resources both human and financial. This may be due to differences in ownership structures and also managerial variability. Both need to improve their performance learning each other‟s experience.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信