替莫唑胺驱动错配修复缺陷,促进肿瘤细胞新抗原生成

V. Amodio, Giovanni Grmano, L. Barault, S. Lamba, G. Rospo, A. Magrì, F. Maione, Giovanni Crisafulli, Carlotta Cancelliere, G. Lerda, A. Bartolini, G. Siravegna, B. Mussolin, Roberta Frappolli, M. Montone, G. Randon, F. Braud, Nabil Amirouchene Angelozzi, S. Marsoni, M. D’Incalci, A. Orlandi, E. Giraudo, Andrea Satore-Bianchi, S. Siena, F. Pietrantonio, F. Nicolantonio, A. Bardelli
{"title":"替莫唑胺驱动错配修复缺陷,促进肿瘤细胞新抗原生成","authors":"V. Amodio, Giovanni Grmano, L. Barault, S. Lamba, G. Rospo, A. Magrì, F. Maione, Giovanni Crisafulli, Carlotta Cancelliere, G. Lerda, A. Bartolini, G. Siravegna, B. Mussolin, Roberta Frappolli, M. Montone, G. Randon, F. Braud, Nabil Amirouchene Angelozzi, S. Marsoni, M. D’Incalci, A. Orlandi, E. Giraudo, Andrea Satore-Bianchi, S. Siena, F. Pietrantonio, F. Nicolantonio, A. Bardelli","doi":"10.1158/2326-6074.CRICIMTEATIAACR18-B069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The tumor mutational burden affects immune surveillance and is associated with response to immune checkpoint blockade. We recently reported that inactivation of the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) pathway in cancer cells increases the mutational burden and modifies the neoantigen landscapes of cancer cells leading to their increased recognition by the immune system. We designed a pharmacologic screening to identify FDA-approved drugs capable of differentially affecting cancer cells MMR proficient and deficient. MMR-deficienT-cells displayed lower sensitivity to the alkylating agent Temozolomide (TMZ) and to the antimetabolite 6-Thioguanine (6-TG). Cells lacking key elements of the MMR pathway such as MutL homolog1, MutS homolog2 (MSH2) or MutS homolog 6 (MSH6), displayed an increased resistance to both TMZ and 6-TG. Next we treated two mouse colorectal cancer cell lines (MC38 and CT26) with TMZ until resistant populations emerged. MC38 cells acquired TMZ resistance through inactivation of the MMR pathway. Bioinformatic analysis revealed that these cells had higher numbers of neoantigens compared to parental cells. Importantly, when MC38 MMRd cells were injected in syngeneic mice, they were unable to form tumors. On the contrary, CT26 cells that acquired TMZ-resistance through other mechanisms, efficiently formed tumors in mice. Therefore, TMZ-induced MMR inactivation, and not TMZ treatment per se, triggered immune surveillance. To assess whether results obtained in mouse cancer models might translate to human disease, we tested TMZ in 47 molecularly annotated colorectal cancer (CRC) cancer cell lines. Only MMR-proficienT-cells and cells in which O6-methylguanine-DNA- methyltransferase (MGMT, the enzyme responsible for repairing the DNA adducts formed by TMZ) was not expressed were sensible to TMZ. Ten sensitive cell lines were chronically treated with TMZ until resistant populations emerged; we found that MGMT re-expression and loss of MMR genes were the main mechanisms of acquired resistance. In agreement with in vitro observations, analysis of biopsies from eight patients relapsing upon TMZ-based therapeutic regimens revealed MGMT re-expression (5 patients) and MMR genes mutations (i.e., MSH2 or MSH6) as main resistance mechanism. In both cell lines and biopsies, MMR inactivation led to increased mutational load and, consequently, to higher levels of predicted neo-antigens, suggesting an augmented immunogenicity. These preclinical data led to the clinical trial Arethusa (NCT03519412; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03519412). Within Arethusa MMR-proficient patients will be tested for (MGMT) expression (IHC) and then for MGMT promoter methylation. MGMT negative patients will be treated with temozolomide (TMZ). Patients progressing under temozolomide will be tested for tumor mutational burden (TMB) and proceed to pembrolizumab if TMB is > 20 mutations/Mb. The primary study hypothesis is that tumors with acquired resistance to temozolomide might become hypermutated and could be sensitive to the anti PD-1 antibody, pembrolizumab. Citation Format: Vito Amodio, Giovanni Grmano, Ludovic Barault, Simona Lamba, Giuseppe Rospo, Alessandro Magri, Federica Maione, Giovanni Crisafulli, Carlotta Cancelliere, Giulia Lerda, Alice Bartolini, Giulia Siravegna, Benedetta Mussolin, Roberta Frappolli, Monica Montone, Giovanni Randon, Filippo de Braud, Nabil Amirouchene Angelozzi, Silvia Marsoni, Maurizio D9Incalci, Armando Orlandi, Enrico Giraudo, Andrea Satore-Bianchi, Salvatore Siena, Filippo Pietrantonio, Federica Di Nicolantonio, Alberto Bardelli. Temozolomide drives mismatch repair deficiency and fosters neoantigen generation in tumor cells [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Fourth CRI-CIMT-EATI-AACR International Cancer Immunotherapy Conference: Translating Science into Survival; Sept 30-Oct 3, 2018; New York, NY. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Immunol Res 2019;7(2 Suppl):Abstract nr B069.","PeriodicalId":433681,"journal":{"name":"Mutational Analysis and Predicting Response to Immunotherapy","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Abstract B069: Temozolomide drives mismatch repair deficiency and fosters neoantigen generation in tumor cells\",\"authors\":\"V. Amodio, Giovanni Grmano, L. Barault, S. Lamba, G. Rospo, A. Magrì, F. Maione, Giovanni Crisafulli, Carlotta Cancelliere, G. Lerda, A. Bartolini, G. Siravegna, B. Mussolin, Roberta Frappolli, M. Montone, G. Randon, F. Braud, Nabil Amirouchene Angelozzi, S. Marsoni, M. D’Incalci, A. Orlandi, E. Giraudo, Andrea Satore-Bianchi, S. Siena, F. Pietrantonio, F. Nicolantonio, A. Bardelli\",\"doi\":\"10.1158/2326-6074.CRICIMTEATIAACR18-B069\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The tumor mutational burden affects immune surveillance and is associated with response to immune checkpoint blockade. We recently reported that inactivation of the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) pathway in cancer cells increases the mutational burden and modifies the neoantigen landscapes of cancer cells leading to their increased recognition by the immune system. We designed a pharmacologic screening to identify FDA-approved drugs capable of differentially affecting cancer cells MMR proficient and deficient. MMR-deficienT-cells displayed lower sensitivity to the alkylating agent Temozolomide (TMZ) and to the antimetabolite 6-Thioguanine (6-TG). Cells lacking key elements of the MMR pathway such as MutL homolog1, MutS homolog2 (MSH2) or MutS homolog 6 (MSH6), displayed an increased resistance to both TMZ and 6-TG. Next we treated two mouse colorectal cancer cell lines (MC38 and CT26) with TMZ until resistant populations emerged. MC38 cells acquired TMZ resistance through inactivation of the MMR pathway. Bioinformatic analysis revealed that these cells had higher numbers of neoantigens compared to parental cells. Importantly, when MC38 MMRd cells were injected in syngeneic mice, they were unable to form tumors. On the contrary, CT26 cells that acquired TMZ-resistance through other mechanisms, efficiently formed tumors in mice. Therefore, TMZ-induced MMR inactivation, and not TMZ treatment per se, triggered immune surveillance. To assess whether results obtained in mouse cancer models might translate to human disease, we tested TMZ in 47 molecularly annotated colorectal cancer (CRC) cancer cell lines. Only MMR-proficienT-cells and cells in which O6-methylguanine-DNA- methyltransferase (MGMT, the enzyme responsible for repairing the DNA adducts formed by TMZ) was not expressed were sensible to TMZ. Ten sensitive cell lines were chronically treated with TMZ until resistant populations emerged; we found that MGMT re-expression and loss of MMR genes were the main mechanisms of acquired resistance. In agreement with in vitro observations, analysis of biopsies from eight patients relapsing upon TMZ-based therapeutic regimens revealed MGMT re-expression (5 patients) and MMR genes mutations (i.e., MSH2 or MSH6) as main resistance mechanism. In both cell lines and biopsies, MMR inactivation led to increased mutational load and, consequently, to higher levels of predicted neo-antigens, suggesting an augmented immunogenicity. These preclinical data led to the clinical trial Arethusa (NCT03519412; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03519412). Within Arethusa MMR-proficient patients will be tested for (MGMT) expression (IHC) and then for MGMT promoter methylation. MGMT negative patients will be treated with temozolomide (TMZ). Patients progressing under temozolomide will be tested for tumor mutational burden (TMB) and proceed to pembrolizumab if TMB is > 20 mutations/Mb. The primary study hypothesis is that tumors with acquired resistance to temozolomide might become hypermutated and could be sensitive to the anti PD-1 antibody, pembrolizumab. Citation Format: Vito Amodio, Giovanni Grmano, Ludovic Barault, Simona Lamba, Giuseppe Rospo, Alessandro Magri, Federica Maione, Giovanni Crisafulli, Carlotta Cancelliere, Giulia Lerda, Alice Bartolini, Giulia Siravegna, Benedetta Mussolin, Roberta Frappolli, Monica Montone, Giovanni Randon, Filippo de Braud, Nabil Amirouchene Angelozzi, Silvia Marsoni, Maurizio D9Incalci, Armando Orlandi, Enrico Giraudo, Andrea Satore-Bianchi, Salvatore Siena, Filippo Pietrantonio, Federica Di Nicolantonio, Alberto Bardelli. Temozolomide drives mismatch repair deficiency and fosters neoantigen generation in tumor cells [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Fourth CRI-CIMT-EATI-AACR International Cancer Immunotherapy Conference: Translating Science into Survival; Sept 30-Oct 3, 2018; New York, NY. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Immunol Res 2019;7(2 Suppl):Abstract nr B069.\",\"PeriodicalId\":433681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mutational Analysis and Predicting Response to Immunotherapy\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mutational Analysis and Predicting Response to Immunotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1158/2326-6074.CRICIMTEATIAACR18-B069\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mutational Analysis and Predicting Response to Immunotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/2326-6074.CRICIMTEATIAACR18-B069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肿瘤突变负担影响免疫监视,并与免疫检查点封锁的反应有关。我们最近报道了癌细胞中DNA错配修复(MMR)途径的失活增加了突变负担并改变了癌细胞的新抗原景观,导致免疫系统对其的识别增加。我们设计了一个药理学筛选,以确定fda批准的药物能够不同地影响MMR精通和缺乏的癌细胞。mmr缺陷细胞对烷基化剂替莫唑胺(TMZ)和抗代谢物6-硫鸟嘌呤(6-TG)的敏感性较低。缺乏MMR通路关键元件如MutL同源物1、MutS同源物2 (MSH2)或MutS同源物6 (MSH6)的细胞对TMZ和6- tg的抗性均增加。接下来,我们用TMZ处理两种小鼠结直肠癌细胞系(MC38和CT26),直到出现耐药群体。MC38细胞通过MMR途径失活获得TMZ抗性。生物信息学分析显示,与亲本细胞相比,这些细胞具有更高数量的新抗原。重要的是,当MC38 MMRd细胞被注射到同基因小鼠体内时,它们不能形成肿瘤。相反,通过其他机制获得tmz抗性的CT26细胞在小鼠体内高效形成肿瘤。因此,触发免疫监视的是TMZ诱导的MMR失活,而不是TMZ治疗本身。为了评估在小鼠癌症模型中获得的结果是否可以转化为人类疾病,我们在47个分子标记的结直肠癌(CRC)癌细胞系中测试了TMZ。只有mmr熟练细胞和o6 -甲基鸟嘌呤-DNA甲基转移酶(MGMT,负责修复TMZ形成的DNA加合物的酶)不表达的细胞对TMZ敏感。10个敏感细胞系长期用TMZ处理,直到出现耐药群体;我们发现MGMT重新表达和MMR基因丢失是获得性耐药的主要机制。与体外观察一致的是,对8例以tmz为基础治疗方案复发患者的活检分析显示MGMT重新表达(5例)和MMR基因突变(即MSH2或MSH6)是主要的耐药机制。在细胞系和活组织检查中,MMR失活导致突变负荷增加,因此,预测的新抗原水平更高,表明免疫原性增强。这些临床前数据导致了临床试验Arethusa (NCT03519412;https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03519412)。在Arethusa,精通mmr的患者将测试MGMT表达(IHC),然后测试MGMT启动子甲基化。MGMT阴性患者采用替莫唑胺(TMZ)治疗。替莫唑胺治疗进展的患者将进行肿瘤突变负荷(TMB)检测,如果TMB > 20个突变/Mb,则继续使用派姆单抗。主要的研究假设是,对替莫唑胺获得性耐药的肿瘤可能会发生超突变,并且可能对抗PD-1抗体派姆单抗敏感。引文格式:维托·阿莫迪奥、乔瓦尼·格马诺、卢多维奇·巴洛特、西蒙娜·兰巴、朱塞佩·罗斯波、亚历山德罗·马格里、乔瓦尼·克里萨弗利、卡洛塔·坎塞利埃、朱利亚·勒达、爱丽丝·巴托里尼、朱利亚·西拉韦纳、贝内代塔·墨索林、罗伯塔·弗拉波利、莫妮卡·蒙托内、乔瓦尼·兰登、菲利波·德·布劳德、纳比尔·阿米罗彻内·安杰洛齐、西尔维娅·马索尼、毛里齐奥·迪因卡尔奇、阿曼多·奥兰蒂、恩里科·吉拉乌多、安德烈·萨托-比安奇、塞尔瓦托·锡耶纳、菲利瓦尼·彼得伦尼奥、费代丽卡·迪·尼科安东尼奥、阿尔贝托·巴尔代利。替莫唑胺驱动错配修复缺陷,促进肿瘤细胞新抗原生成[摘要]。第四届CRI-CIMT-EATI-AACR国际癌症免疫治疗会议:将科学转化为生存;2018年9月30日至10月3日;纽约,纽约。费城(PA): AACR;癌症免疫学杂志2019;7(2增刊):摘要nr B069。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Abstract B069: Temozolomide drives mismatch repair deficiency and fosters neoantigen generation in tumor cells
The tumor mutational burden affects immune surveillance and is associated with response to immune checkpoint blockade. We recently reported that inactivation of the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) pathway in cancer cells increases the mutational burden and modifies the neoantigen landscapes of cancer cells leading to their increased recognition by the immune system. We designed a pharmacologic screening to identify FDA-approved drugs capable of differentially affecting cancer cells MMR proficient and deficient. MMR-deficienT-cells displayed lower sensitivity to the alkylating agent Temozolomide (TMZ) and to the antimetabolite 6-Thioguanine (6-TG). Cells lacking key elements of the MMR pathway such as MutL homolog1, MutS homolog2 (MSH2) or MutS homolog 6 (MSH6), displayed an increased resistance to both TMZ and 6-TG. Next we treated two mouse colorectal cancer cell lines (MC38 and CT26) with TMZ until resistant populations emerged. MC38 cells acquired TMZ resistance through inactivation of the MMR pathway. Bioinformatic analysis revealed that these cells had higher numbers of neoantigens compared to parental cells. Importantly, when MC38 MMRd cells were injected in syngeneic mice, they were unable to form tumors. On the contrary, CT26 cells that acquired TMZ-resistance through other mechanisms, efficiently formed tumors in mice. Therefore, TMZ-induced MMR inactivation, and not TMZ treatment per se, triggered immune surveillance. To assess whether results obtained in mouse cancer models might translate to human disease, we tested TMZ in 47 molecularly annotated colorectal cancer (CRC) cancer cell lines. Only MMR-proficienT-cells and cells in which O6-methylguanine-DNA- methyltransferase (MGMT, the enzyme responsible for repairing the DNA adducts formed by TMZ) was not expressed were sensible to TMZ. Ten sensitive cell lines were chronically treated with TMZ until resistant populations emerged; we found that MGMT re-expression and loss of MMR genes were the main mechanisms of acquired resistance. In agreement with in vitro observations, analysis of biopsies from eight patients relapsing upon TMZ-based therapeutic regimens revealed MGMT re-expression (5 patients) and MMR genes mutations (i.e., MSH2 or MSH6) as main resistance mechanism. In both cell lines and biopsies, MMR inactivation led to increased mutational load and, consequently, to higher levels of predicted neo-antigens, suggesting an augmented immunogenicity. These preclinical data led to the clinical trial Arethusa (NCT03519412; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03519412). Within Arethusa MMR-proficient patients will be tested for (MGMT) expression (IHC) and then for MGMT promoter methylation. MGMT negative patients will be treated with temozolomide (TMZ). Patients progressing under temozolomide will be tested for tumor mutational burden (TMB) and proceed to pembrolizumab if TMB is > 20 mutations/Mb. The primary study hypothesis is that tumors with acquired resistance to temozolomide might become hypermutated and could be sensitive to the anti PD-1 antibody, pembrolizumab. Citation Format: Vito Amodio, Giovanni Grmano, Ludovic Barault, Simona Lamba, Giuseppe Rospo, Alessandro Magri, Federica Maione, Giovanni Crisafulli, Carlotta Cancelliere, Giulia Lerda, Alice Bartolini, Giulia Siravegna, Benedetta Mussolin, Roberta Frappolli, Monica Montone, Giovanni Randon, Filippo de Braud, Nabil Amirouchene Angelozzi, Silvia Marsoni, Maurizio D9Incalci, Armando Orlandi, Enrico Giraudo, Andrea Satore-Bianchi, Salvatore Siena, Filippo Pietrantonio, Federica Di Nicolantonio, Alberto Bardelli. Temozolomide drives mismatch repair deficiency and fosters neoantigen generation in tumor cells [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Fourth CRI-CIMT-EATI-AACR International Cancer Immunotherapy Conference: Translating Science into Survival; Sept 30-Oct 3, 2018; New York, NY. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Immunol Res 2019;7(2 Suppl):Abstract nr B069.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信