Lee Min Foo, Diana-Toh Shi Jin, Thamotaran Tinesh, Mei Li Jane-Foo, Qi Zhe Ngoo, S. Khairy-Shamel, A. Liza-Sharmini
{"title":"瞳孔后虹膜-爪形人工晶状体植入术的疗效回顾","authors":"Lee Min Foo, Diana-Toh Shi Jin, Thamotaran Tinesh, Mei Li Jane-Foo, Qi Zhe Ngoo, S. Khairy-Shamel, A. Liza-Sharmini","doi":"10.35119/myjo.v4i1.262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Intraocular lens (IOL) selection, especially in cases with insufficient capsular and/or zonular support has increasingly become a challenge to surgeons. Retropupillary iris-claw IOLs (RP-ICIOL) have gained popularity in recent years.Purpose: This study aimed to review the outcomes of RP-ICIOL implantation in two tertiary eye centres.Study design: Retrospective review.Methods: This is a retrospective study of 14 eyes of 14 patients who underwent Artisan RP-ICIOL implantation between November 2018 and December 2020 in two tertiary eye centres in Malaysia.Results: The mean age of patients was 51.5 ± 17.4 years with the range between 18 and 77 years old. There were ten (71.4%) males and four (28.6%) females. The IOL was implanted primarily in three eyes (21.43%) and as a secondary procedure in eleven eyes (78.6%). Mean preoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was logMAR 1.32 ± 0.82, while mean postoperative BCVA was logMAR 0.56 ± 0.42 (p = 0.010). Visual improvement of two or more lines in BCVA was observed in nine eyes (64.3%), no improvement in two eyes (14.3%), and worsening in three eyes (21.4%). There were no complications observed during the surgery. All our patients had a well-centred IOL at the 1-month postoperative follow-up. Mean preoperative intraocular pressure was 16.8 ± 2.0 mmHg and postoperative intraocular pressure was 15.7 ± 5.1 mmHg (p = 0.430).Conclusion: RP-ICIOL implantation is safe and provides the optical advantage of a more biologically appropriate retropupillary position, ensuring a favourable functional visual outcome with low risk of complications.","PeriodicalId":405983,"journal":{"name":"Malaysian Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surgical outcome of retropupillary iris-claw lens implantation: a retrospective review\",\"authors\":\"Lee Min Foo, Diana-Toh Shi Jin, Thamotaran Tinesh, Mei Li Jane-Foo, Qi Zhe Ngoo, S. Khairy-Shamel, A. Liza-Sharmini\",\"doi\":\"10.35119/myjo.v4i1.262\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Intraocular lens (IOL) selection, especially in cases with insufficient capsular and/or zonular support has increasingly become a challenge to surgeons. Retropupillary iris-claw IOLs (RP-ICIOL) have gained popularity in recent years.Purpose: This study aimed to review the outcomes of RP-ICIOL implantation in two tertiary eye centres.Study design: Retrospective review.Methods: This is a retrospective study of 14 eyes of 14 patients who underwent Artisan RP-ICIOL implantation between November 2018 and December 2020 in two tertiary eye centres in Malaysia.Results: The mean age of patients was 51.5 ± 17.4 years with the range between 18 and 77 years old. There were ten (71.4%) males and four (28.6%) females. The IOL was implanted primarily in three eyes (21.43%) and as a secondary procedure in eleven eyes (78.6%). Mean preoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was logMAR 1.32 ± 0.82, while mean postoperative BCVA was logMAR 0.56 ± 0.42 (p = 0.010). Visual improvement of two or more lines in BCVA was observed in nine eyes (64.3%), no improvement in two eyes (14.3%), and worsening in three eyes (21.4%). There were no complications observed during the surgery. All our patients had a well-centred IOL at the 1-month postoperative follow-up. Mean preoperative intraocular pressure was 16.8 ± 2.0 mmHg and postoperative intraocular pressure was 15.7 ± 5.1 mmHg (p = 0.430).Conclusion: RP-ICIOL implantation is safe and provides the optical advantage of a more biologically appropriate retropupillary position, ensuring a favourable functional visual outcome with low risk of complications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":405983,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Malaysian Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Malaysian Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35119/myjo.v4i1.262\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malaysian Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35119/myjo.v4i1.262","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Surgical outcome of retropupillary iris-claw lens implantation: a retrospective review
Introduction: Intraocular lens (IOL) selection, especially in cases with insufficient capsular and/or zonular support has increasingly become a challenge to surgeons. Retropupillary iris-claw IOLs (RP-ICIOL) have gained popularity in recent years.Purpose: This study aimed to review the outcomes of RP-ICIOL implantation in two tertiary eye centres.Study design: Retrospective review.Methods: This is a retrospective study of 14 eyes of 14 patients who underwent Artisan RP-ICIOL implantation between November 2018 and December 2020 in two tertiary eye centres in Malaysia.Results: The mean age of patients was 51.5 ± 17.4 years with the range between 18 and 77 years old. There were ten (71.4%) males and four (28.6%) females. The IOL was implanted primarily in three eyes (21.43%) and as a secondary procedure in eleven eyes (78.6%). Mean preoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was logMAR 1.32 ± 0.82, while mean postoperative BCVA was logMAR 0.56 ± 0.42 (p = 0.010). Visual improvement of two or more lines in BCVA was observed in nine eyes (64.3%), no improvement in two eyes (14.3%), and worsening in three eyes (21.4%). There were no complications observed during the surgery. All our patients had a well-centred IOL at the 1-month postoperative follow-up. Mean preoperative intraocular pressure was 16.8 ± 2.0 mmHg and postoperative intraocular pressure was 15.7 ± 5.1 mmHg (p = 0.430).Conclusion: RP-ICIOL implantation is safe and provides the optical advantage of a more biologically appropriate retropupillary position, ensuring a favourable functional visual outcome with low risk of complications.