富镁沉积1单元岩屑组合的工艺特征和类型特征

O. I. Tsvirkun, P. Shydlovskyi
{"title":"富镁沉积1单元岩屑组合的工艺特征和类型特征","authors":"O. I. Tsvirkun, P. Shydlovskyi","doi":"10.37445/adiu.2022.04.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mezhyrich is an Epigravettian open air base camp dated to 14.9—14.3 ka 14C BP (i. e. between 18.2 and 17.4 ka 14C cal BP), inserted in a loessic sedimentary context, situated on a cape formed by the valleys of the Ros and Rosava Rivers about 12 km west from the Dnieper River (Kaniv District, Cherkassy Region). The settlement consists of four household Units, each of which represents a concentration of functionally different objects with mammoth bone dwelling in the center. In the studies of the objects of Unit 1 several stages are distinguished. The first is the excavation of dwelling 1 under the scientific supervision of I. H. Podoplichko in 1966. The second is a typological and statistical studies of the lithic assemblage conducted by M. I. Gladkikh in the 1970s—2000s. The third is new excavations of the Unit 1 objects, typological and technological analysis of flint artifacts in 2006—2010. The fourth, from 2010 to the present day, is the continuation of excavations within the boundaries of the Unit 1, technological, typological, and statistical analysis of the materials of the assemblage. \nThe article considers the conditions of research of Unit 1, the spatial and stratigraphic context of the assemblage objects’ location, typological, statistical and technological features of flint products obtained as a result of excavations in the last 12 years. The analysis of the distribution of finds together with stratigraphic observations allows us to assert the presence of at least two anthropogenic layers and, accordingly, residential surfaces on the territory of this Unit. Planigraphic features demonstrate the functional specialization of various parts of the interior and exterior space of the dwelling 1. \nThe provided analysis makes it possible to determine the degree of technological affinity of the Upper Palaeolithic sites. The studied flint assemblage comes from a relatively closed archaeological site and can serve as a benchmark for the comparative studies of different lithic industries. The article analyzes the features of flint sets separately from the excavations of dwelling 1 and the area of the cultural layer to the south of it. The difference in the typological and statistical characteristics of both complexes demonstrates peculiarities in the economic behavior of the residents. The data on the spatial distribution of flint products from other Mezhyrichian household units are characterized by common features in the organization of living space. Such behavioral patterns of prehistoric inhabitants require the search for more distant analogies of the industry both within the frames of the Mezhyrichian, and in general among the East European Upper Palaeolithic.","PeriodicalId":406948,"journal":{"name":"Archaeology and Early History of Ukraine","volume":"115 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"TECHNOLOGICAL AND TYPOLOGICAL FEATURES OF THE UNIT 1 LITHIC ASSEMBLAGE FROM MEZHYRICH SETTLEMENT\",\"authors\":\"O. I. Tsvirkun, P. Shydlovskyi\",\"doi\":\"10.37445/adiu.2022.04.03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Mezhyrich is an Epigravettian open air base camp dated to 14.9—14.3 ka 14C BP (i. e. between 18.2 and 17.4 ka 14C cal BP), inserted in a loessic sedimentary context, situated on a cape formed by the valleys of the Ros and Rosava Rivers about 12 km west from the Dnieper River (Kaniv District, Cherkassy Region). The settlement consists of four household Units, each of which represents a concentration of functionally different objects with mammoth bone dwelling in the center. In the studies of the objects of Unit 1 several stages are distinguished. The first is the excavation of dwelling 1 under the scientific supervision of I. H. Podoplichko in 1966. The second is a typological and statistical studies of the lithic assemblage conducted by M. I. Gladkikh in the 1970s—2000s. The third is new excavations of the Unit 1 objects, typological and technological analysis of flint artifacts in 2006—2010. The fourth, from 2010 to the present day, is the continuation of excavations within the boundaries of the Unit 1, technological, typological, and statistical analysis of the materials of the assemblage. \\nThe article considers the conditions of research of Unit 1, the spatial and stratigraphic context of the assemblage objects’ location, typological, statistical and technological features of flint products obtained as a result of excavations in the last 12 years. The analysis of the distribution of finds together with stratigraphic observations allows us to assert the presence of at least two anthropogenic layers and, accordingly, residential surfaces on the territory of this Unit. Planigraphic features demonstrate the functional specialization of various parts of the interior and exterior space of the dwelling 1. \\nThe provided analysis makes it possible to determine the degree of technological affinity of the Upper Palaeolithic sites. The studied flint assemblage comes from a relatively closed archaeological site and can serve as a benchmark for the comparative studies of different lithic industries. The article analyzes the features of flint sets separately from the excavations of dwelling 1 and the area of the cultural layer to the south of it. The difference in the typological and statistical characteristics of both complexes demonstrates peculiarities in the economic behavior of the residents. The data on the spatial distribution of flint products from other Mezhyrichian household units are characterized by common features in the organization of living space. Such behavioral patterns of prehistoric inhabitants require the search for more distant analogies of the industry both within the frames of the Mezhyrichian, and in general among the East European Upper Palaeolithic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":406948,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archaeology and Early History of Ukraine\",\"volume\":\"115 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archaeology and Early History of Ukraine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37445/adiu.2022.04.03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archaeology and Early History of Ukraine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37445/adiu.2022.04.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Mezhyrich是一个Epigravettian露天基地营地,其年代为14.9-14.3 ka 14C BP(即18.2 - 17.4 ka 14C BP),位于黄土沉积环境中,位于第聂伯河以西约12公里的Ros和Rosava河山谷形成的海角上(Kaniv地区,Cherkassy地区)。该定居点由四个家庭单元组成,每个家庭单元都代表了功能不同的物体的集中,中心是猛犸象骨住宅。在对第一单元对象的研究中,可以区分出几个阶段。第一次是1966年在I. H. Podoplichko的科学监督下对1号住宅的发掘。第二部分是M. I. Gladkikh在20世纪70年代至21世纪初对岩屑组合进行的类型学和统计学研究。第三是2006-2010年新发掘的1号单元物品、燧石文物的类型和技术分析。第四,从2010年至今,是在第1单元的边界内继续挖掘,对组合材料进行技术,类型和统计分析。本文综合考虑了1单元的研究条件、组合物位置的空间和地层背景,以及近12年来发掘的燧石产品的类型学、统计学和工艺特征。对发现物分布的分析加上地层观察,使我们能够断言,在本股的领土上至少存在两个人为层,因此,有居住表面。平面特征展示了住宅室内外空间各部分的功能专业化。所提供的分析使确定旧石器时代晚期遗址的技术亲和程度成为可能。所研究的燧石组合来自一个相对封闭的考古遗址,可以作为不同石器工业比较研究的基准。本文分别从1号民居的发掘和1号民居以南的文化层区域分析了燧石集的特征。这两个建筑群在类型和统计特征上的差异表明了居民经济行为的特殊性。其他梅氏家庭单位火石产品的空间分布数据在生活空间组织上具有共同的特征。史前居民的这种行为模式需要在mezhyrician和东欧旧石器时代晚期的框架内寻找更遥远的工业类比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
TECHNOLOGICAL AND TYPOLOGICAL FEATURES OF THE UNIT 1 LITHIC ASSEMBLAGE FROM MEZHYRICH SETTLEMENT
Mezhyrich is an Epigravettian open air base camp dated to 14.9—14.3 ka 14C BP (i. e. between 18.2 and 17.4 ka 14C cal BP), inserted in a loessic sedimentary context, situated on a cape formed by the valleys of the Ros and Rosava Rivers about 12 km west from the Dnieper River (Kaniv District, Cherkassy Region). The settlement consists of four household Units, each of which represents a concentration of functionally different objects with mammoth bone dwelling in the center. In the studies of the objects of Unit 1 several stages are distinguished. The first is the excavation of dwelling 1 under the scientific supervision of I. H. Podoplichko in 1966. The second is a typological and statistical studies of the lithic assemblage conducted by M. I. Gladkikh in the 1970s—2000s. The third is new excavations of the Unit 1 objects, typological and technological analysis of flint artifacts in 2006—2010. The fourth, from 2010 to the present day, is the continuation of excavations within the boundaries of the Unit 1, technological, typological, and statistical analysis of the materials of the assemblage. The article considers the conditions of research of Unit 1, the spatial and stratigraphic context of the assemblage objects’ location, typological, statistical and technological features of flint products obtained as a result of excavations in the last 12 years. The analysis of the distribution of finds together with stratigraphic observations allows us to assert the presence of at least two anthropogenic layers and, accordingly, residential surfaces on the territory of this Unit. Planigraphic features demonstrate the functional specialization of various parts of the interior and exterior space of the dwelling 1. The provided analysis makes it possible to determine the degree of technological affinity of the Upper Palaeolithic sites. The studied flint assemblage comes from a relatively closed archaeological site and can serve as a benchmark for the comparative studies of different lithic industries. The article analyzes the features of flint sets separately from the excavations of dwelling 1 and the area of the cultural layer to the south of it. The difference in the typological and statistical characteristics of both complexes demonstrates peculiarities in the economic behavior of the residents. The data on the spatial distribution of flint products from other Mezhyrichian household units are characterized by common features in the organization of living space. Such behavioral patterns of prehistoric inhabitants require the search for more distant analogies of the industry both within the frames of the Mezhyrichian, and in general among the East European Upper Palaeolithic.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信