第十章:金融市场——寻求最优的消费者(客户)保护

Tomasz Klemt
{"title":"第十章:金融市场——寻求最优的消费者(客户)保护","authors":"Tomasz Klemt","doi":"10.5771/9783748908463-231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Properly designed and applied regulations are a prerequisite for the effect‐ ive functioning of the financial market. Their final shape, however, de‐ pends on the existing market and political conditions, which means that market participants are influenced by almost every public and private eco‐ nomic decision (Kennedy, 1962: 8). The currently prevailing trends in this area are called paradigms, i.e. patterns accepted by the scientific commu‐ nity which are a solution to a certain problem (Kuhn, 1970: 10). Thus, in relation to regulation, paradigms are the framework of ideas and standards that define not only policy objectives and the types of instruments that can be used to attain them but also the very nature of the issues they are sup‐ posed to address (Ramsay, 2016: 161). Until recently, the so-called Wash‐ ington Consensus has served as such a pattern in the financial market (Lopes, 2012: 69). The previous financial system paradigm assumed the market to be ratio‐ nal, efficient, and competitive (with an optimal allocation of resources and the lack of information asymmetry, market imbalance, and externalities). Consequently, the focus was on the security of individual institutions and the rationality of the financial market, assuming that this ensures the secu‐ rity of the entire system. This widely accepted assumption was, however, challenged by the experience of the financial crisis of 2007-2009. It clear‐ ly demonstrated that the then functioning system of micro-prudential su‐ pervision was insufficient and needed to be strengthened and complement‐ ed with regulations concerning the macro-prudential aspect. One of many negative opinions on that system was expressed by Joseph E. Stiglitz, who Chapter 10:","PeriodicalId":445645,"journal":{"name":"Economic Freedom and Market Regulation","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chapter 10: Financial market – in search of optimal consumer (customer) protection\",\"authors\":\"Tomasz Klemt\",\"doi\":\"10.5771/9783748908463-231\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Properly designed and applied regulations are a prerequisite for the effect‐ ive functioning of the financial market. Their final shape, however, de‐ pends on the existing market and political conditions, which means that market participants are influenced by almost every public and private eco‐ nomic decision (Kennedy, 1962: 8). The currently prevailing trends in this area are called paradigms, i.e. patterns accepted by the scientific commu‐ nity which are a solution to a certain problem (Kuhn, 1970: 10). Thus, in relation to regulation, paradigms are the framework of ideas and standards that define not only policy objectives and the types of instruments that can be used to attain them but also the very nature of the issues they are sup‐ posed to address (Ramsay, 2016: 161). Until recently, the so-called Wash‐ ington Consensus has served as such a pattern in the financial market (Lopes, 2012: 69). The previous financial system paradigm assumed the market to be ratio‐ nal, efficient, and competitive (with an optimal allocation of resources and the lack of information asymmetry, market imbalance, and externalities). Consequently, the focus was on the security of individual institutions and the rationality of the financial market, assuming that this ensures the secu‐ rity of the entire system. This widely accepted assumption was, however, challenged by the experience of the financial crisis of 2007-2009. It clear‐ ly demonstrated that the then functioning system of micro-prudential su‐ pervision was insufficient and needed to be strengthened and complement‐ ed with regulations concerning the macro-prudential aspect. One of many negative opinions on that system was expressed by Joseph E. Stiglitz, who Chapter 10:\",\"PeriodicalId\":445645,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economic Freedom and Market Regulation\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economic Freedom and Market Regulation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748908463-231\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Freedom and Market Regulation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748908463-231","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

合理设计和实施监管是金融市场有效运作的先决条件。然而,它们的最终形态取决于现有的市场和政治条件,这意味着市场参与者几乎受到每一个公共和私人经济决策的影响(Kennedy, 1962: 8)。目前在这一领域盛行的趋势被称为范式,即科学界所接受的模式,它们是某个问题的解决方案(Kuhn, 1970: 10)。因此,就监管而言,范式是概念和标准的框架,它不仅定义了政策目标和可用于实现这些目标的工具类型,还定义了它们所要解决的问题的本质(Ramsay, 2016: 161)。直到最近,所谓的华盛顿共识一直是金融市场的一种模式(Lopes, 2012: 69)。先前的金融体系范式假设市场是按比例、高效和竞争的(资源的最佳配置,缺乏信息不对称、市场不平衡和外部性)。因此,重点是单个机构的安全性和金融市场的合理性,假设这确保了整个系统的安全性。然而,这一被广泛接受的假设受到了2007-2009年金融危机的挑战。它清楚地表明,当时有效的微观审慎监管体系是不够的,需要加强和补充有关宏观审慎方面的规定。约瑟夫·斯蒂格利茨(Joseph E. Stiglitz)对这一制度提出了许多负面意见之一,他在第10章中说:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Chapter 10: Financial market – in search of optimal consumer (customer) protection
Properly designed and applied regulations are a prerequisite for the effect‐ ive functioning of the financial market. Their final shape, however, de‐ pends on the existing market and political conditions, which means that market participants are influenced by almost every public and private eco‐ nomic decision (Kennedy, 1962: 8). The currently prevailing trends in this area are called paradigms, i.e. patterns accepted by the scientific commu‐ nity which are a solution to a certain problem (Kuhn, 1970: 10). Thus, in relation to regulation, paradigms are the framework of ideas and standards that define not only policy objectives and the types of instruments that can be used to attain them but also the very nature of the issues they are sup‐ posed to address (Ramsay, 2016: 161). Until recently, the so-called Wash‐ ington Consensus has served as such a pattern in the financial market (Lopes, 2012: 69). The previous financial system paradigm assumed the market to be ratio‐ nal, efficient, and competitive (with an optimal allocation of resources and the lack of information asymmetry, market imbalance, and externalities). Consequently, the focus was on the security of individual institutions and the rationality of the financial market, assuming that this ensures the secu‐ rity of the entire system. This widely accepted assumption was, however, challenged by the experience of the financial crisis of 2007-2009. It clear‐ ly demonstrated that the then functioning system of micro-prudential su‐ pervision was insufficient and needed to be strengthened and complement‐ ed with regulations concerning the macro-prudential aspect. One of many negative opinions on that system was expressed by Joseph E. Stiglitz, who Chapter 10:
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信