{"title":"以任务为中心的分析人为容错需求的方法","authors":"B. Fields, P. Wright, M. Harrison","doi":"10.1109/ISRE.1995.512542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We put forward an approach to deriving and applying human error tolerance requirements. Such requirements are concerned with the response of a system to errors introduced by human operators. The approach provides a means by which operators' tasks can be described and analysed for likely errors and the impact of these errors on system safety can be explored. The approach, based on previous work by the same authors (P. Wright et al., 1994), uses a software engineering notation to provide the bridge between operator models and systems engineering concerns. The approach is extended to include a more refined understanding of the processes that contribute to human error. The operators' process in achieving goals is understood in terms of structured tasks. With this additional apparatus we are able to capture a more complex set of human error forms.","PeriodicalId":354711,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of 1995 IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering (RE'95)","volume":"80 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"35","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A task centered approach to analysing human error tolerance requirements\",\"authors\":\"B. Fields, P. Wright, M. Harrison\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISRE.1995.512542\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We put forward an approach to deriving and applying human error tolerance requirements. Such requirements are concerned with the response of a system to errors introduced by human operators. The approach provides a means by which operators' tasks can be described and analysed for likely errors and the impact of these errors on system safety can be explored. The approach, based on previous work by the same authors (P. Wright et al., 1994), uses a software engineering notation to provide the bridge between operator models and systems engineering concerns. The approach is extended to include a more refined understanding of the processes that contribute to human error. The operators' process in achieving goals is understood in terms of structured tasks. With this additional apparatus we are able to capture a more complex set of human error forms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":354711,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of 1995 IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering (RE'95)\",\"volume\":\"80 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"35\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of 1995 IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering (RE'95)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISRE.1995.512542\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of 1995 IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering (RE'95)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISRE.1995.512542","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 35
摘要
提出了一种推导和应用人为容错要求的方法。这些要求与系统对人为操作人员引入的错误的响应有关。该方法提供了一种方法,通过该方法可以描述和分析操作员的任务,以确定可能的错误,并可以探索这些错误对系统安全的影响。该方法基于同一作者以前的工作(P. Wright et al., 1994),使用软件工程符号来提供操作员模型和系统工程关注点之间的桥梁。该方法得到了扩展,包括对导致人为错误的过程的更精确的理解。操作人员实现目标的过程可以用结构化任务来理解。有了这个额外的设备,我们就能够捕获一组更复杂的人为错误形式。
A task centered approach to analysing human error tolerance requirements
We put forward an approach to deriving and applying human error tolerance requirements. Such requirements are concerned with the response of a system to errors introduced by human operators. The approach provides a means by which operators' tasks can be described and analysed for likely errors and the impact of these errors on system safety can be explored. The approach, based on previous work by the same authors (P. Wright et al., 1994), uses a software engineering notation to provide the bridge between operator models and systems engineering concerns. The approach is extended to include a more refined understanding of the processes that contribute to human error. The operators' process in achieving goals is understood in terms of structured tasks. With this additional apparatus we are able to capture a more complex set of human error forms.