{"title":"商业竞争监督管理委员会决定中商业竞争违规规范的实施","authors":"Arifin Ma’ruf, W. Setiyawan, Widiatama Widiatama","doi":"10.20961/JMAIL.V1I2.47127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<table width=\"680\" border=\"1\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\" align=\"left\"><tbody><tr><td valign=\"top\" width=\"487\"><p><strong>This paper analyzes the application of norms concerning violations of business competition in KPPU decisions. The case study in this paper is in the case of violations of business competition conducted by PT Forisa Nusapersada in Case Decision Number 14/KPPU-L/2015. As a comparison, this study also compares the application of norms in cases that are almost similar, namely the Decision of the Case KPPU Number 14/ KPPU-L/ 2015 with the Decision of the Case KPPU Number: 06/KPPU-L/2004. The results of the research show that in addition to Article 19 and Article 25 above, KPPU should also apply Article 52 paragraph (2) letter a and Article 15 paragraph (3) of Law Number 5 of 1999 concerning Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition in the case of PT Forisa Nusapersada.</strong><strong></strong></p><p><strong> </strong></p></td></tr></tbody></table>","PeriodicalId":118998,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Morality and Legal Culture","volume":"1992 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation of Business Competition Violation Norms in the Decision of the Business Competition Supervision Commission\",\"authors\":\"Arifin Ma’ruf, W. Setiyawan, Widiatama Widiatama\",\"doi\":\"10.20961/JMAIL.V1I2.47127\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<table width=\\\"680\\\" border=\\\"1\\\" cellspacing=\\\"0\\\" cellpadding=\\\"0\\\" align=\\\"left\\\"><tbody><tr><td valign=\\\"top\\\" width=\\\"487\\\"><p><strong>This paper analyzes the application of norms concerning violations of business competition in KPPU decisions. The case study in this paper is in the case of violations of business competition conducted by PT Forisa Nusapersada in Case Decision Number 14/KPPU-L/2015. As a comparison, this study also compares the application of norms in cases that are almost similar, namely the Decision of the Case KPPU Number 14/ KPPU-L/ 2015 with the Decision of the Case KPPU Number: 06/KPPU-L/2004. The results of the research show that in addition to Article 19 and Article 25 above, KPPU should also apply Article 52 paragraph (2) letter a and Article 15 paragraph (3) of Law Number 5 of 1999 concerning Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition in the case of PT Forisa Nusapersada.</strong><strong></strong></p><p><strong> </strong></p></td></tr></tbody></table>\",\"PeriodicalId\":118998,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Morality and Legal Culture\",\"volume\":\"1992 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Morality and Legal Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20961/JMAIL.V1I2.47127\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Morality and Legal Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20961/JMAIL.V1I2.47127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
本文分析了违反商业竞争行为规范在KPPU决策中的应用。本文的案例研究是在第14/ kpu - l /2015号判决书中PT Forisa Nusapersada违反商业竞争行为一案。作为比较，本研究还比较了规范在几乎相似的案例中的应用，即KPPU第14/ kpu - l / 2015号案件的判决与KPPU第06/ kpu - l /2004号案件的判决。研究结果表明，除上述第19条和第25条外，KPPU还应适用1999年第5号法关于禁止垄断行为和不正当商业竞争的第52条第(2)款a和第15条第(3)款在PT Forisa Nusapersada案中。
Implementation of Business Competition Violation Norms in the Decision of the Business Competition Supervision Commission
This paper analyzes the application of norms concerning violations of business competition in KPPU decisions. The case study in this paper is in the case of violations of business competition conducted by PT Forisa Nusapersada in Case Decision Number 14/KPPU-L/2015. As a comparison, this study also compares the application of norms in cases that are almost similar, namely the Decision of the Case KPPU Number 14/ KPPU-L/ 2015 with the Decision of the Case KPPU Number: 06/KPPU-L/2004. The results of the research show that in addition to Article 19 and Article 25 above, KPPU should also apply Article 52 paragraph (2) letter a and Article 15 paragraph (3) of Law Number 5 of 1999 concerning Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition in the case of PT Forisa Nusapersada.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
