组织证据以支持软件工程实践

D. Budgen, J. Bøegh, A. Mohan
{"title":"组织证据以支持软件工程实践","authors":"D. Budgen, J. Bøegh, A. Mohan","doi":"10.1109/STEP.2003.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Evidence (in different forms) is widely employed to establish and refine ideas about what constitutes good practice in many domains of science and engineering. However, software engineering (and computing in general) has so far been a notable exception to this, and our paper sets out to explore some of the reasons why this should be so, and how the situation might be changed in the future. We examine the ways in which some other domains collect and use evidence, and then examine both 'commercial' and 'open source' development practices to see how these currently make use of previous experience and evidence. Finally, we consider the possible role of systematic review groups in strengthening the way that evidence could be employed in future software engineering practices.","PeriodicalId":260047,"journal":{"name":"Eleventh Annual International Workshop on Software Technology and Engineering Practice","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Organising evidence to support software engineering practice\",\"authors\":\"D. Budgen, J. Bøegh, A. Mohan\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/STEP.2003.23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Evidence (in different forms) is widely employed to establish and refine ideas about what constitutes good practice in many domains of science and engineering. However, software engineering (and computing in general) has so far been a notable exception to this, and our paper sets out to explore some of the reasons why this should be so, and how the situation might be changed in the future. We examine the ways in which some other domains collect and use evidence, and then examine both 'commercial' and 'open source' development practices to see how these currently make use of previous experience and evidence. Finally, we consider the possible role of systematic review groups in strengthening the way that evidence could be employed in future software engineering practices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":260047,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eleventh Annual International Workshop on Software Technology and Engineering Practice\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eleventh Annual International Workshop on Software Technology and Engineering Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/STEP.2003.23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eleventh Annual International Workshop on Software Technology and Engineering Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/STEP.2003.23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在科学和工程的许多领域中,证据(以不同的形式)被广泛用于建立和完善关于什么是良好实践的想法。然而,到目前为止,软件工程(和一般的计算)一直是一个明显的例外,我们的论文开始探索为什么应该是这样的一些原因,以及这种情况在未来可能如何改变。我们考察了其他一些领域收集和使用证据的方式,然后考察了“商业”和“开源”开发实践,看看它们目前是如何利用以前的经验和证据的。最后,我们考虑了系统评审小组在加强证据可以在未来的软件工程实践中使用的方式中的可能作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Organising evidence to support software engineering practice
Evidence (in different forms) is widely employed to establish and refine ideas about what constitutes good practice in many domains of science and engineering. However, software engineering (and computing in general) has so far been a notable exception to this, and our paper sets out to explore some of the reasons why this should be so, and how the situation might be changed in the future. We examine the ways in which some other domains collect and use evidence, and then examine both 'commercial' and 'open source' development practices to see how these currently make use of previous experience and evidence. Finally, we consider the possible role of systematic review groups in strengthening the way that evidence could be employed in future software engineering practices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信