间信度、内一致性、内一致性、新糖尿病足溃疡评定量表(dfuas)

Nurawaliah Rasyid, S. Yusuf, Takdir Tahir
{"title":"间信度、内一致性、内一致性、新糖尿病足溃疡评定量表(dfuas)","authors":"Nurawaliah Rasyid, S. Yusuf, Takdir Tahir","doi":"10.33490/JKM.V5I1.82","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Diabetic foot ulcers have a high prevalence that requires good management of care. One of them is by assessing diabetic foot wounds. Currently, there has been a review of diabetic foot healing footage of New Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment Scale (DFUAS) which has been tested for validity and photo-based reliability. Nevertheless, in the DFUAS Assessment Reliability Test, there are still differences in perceptions on several DFUAS assessment variables on wound nurses. One reason is that there is no socialization given to the wound nurses on how to assess the DFUAS assessment. In addition, the previous DFUAS assessment reliability test is only performed on certified wound nurses whereas in health care services in patients with diabetic foot injuries are also performed by non-certified general nurses. This study aims to assess the interrater reliability and internal consistency of DFUAS-based on photo assessment on expert nurses and general nurses. The design of this study was cross sectional study. The samples in this study were certified nurses with ETN, CWCC, CWCCA and general non-certified Nurses with more than 2 years experience of wound care. The nurse as an observer evaluated 8 wounded images divided according to the wound stage (necrotic, slough, granulation and epithelial) using DFUAS assessment. Interrater reliability was assessed by spearman rho while internal consistency was assessed by cronbach's alpha. Interrater reliability shows good correlation with spearman rho> 0.60. Internal consistency shows good reliability between DFUAS assessment items and Cronbach's alpha 0.98. This study shows that the DFUAS assessment is reliable on different nurses both certified nurses and general nurses.","PeriodicalId":378605,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Kesehatan Manarang","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"INTERRATER RELIABILITY DAN INTERNAL CONSISTENCY PENGKAJIAN LUKA KAKI DIABETIK THE NEW DIABETIC FOOT ULCER ASSESSMENT SCALE (DFUAS) BERBASIS FOTO\",\"authors\":\"Nurawaliah Rasyid, S. Yusuf, Takdir Tahir\",\"doi\":\"10.33490/JKM.V5I1.82\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Diabetic foot ulcers have a high prevalence that requires good management of care. One of them is by assessing diabetic foot wounds. Currently, there has been a review of diabetic foot healing footage of New Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment Scale (DFUAS) which has been tested for validity and photo-based reliability. Nevertheless, in the DFUAS Assessment Reliability Test, there are still differences in perceptions on several DFUAS assessment variables on wound nurses. One reason is that there is no socialization given to the wound nurses on how to assess the DFUAS assessment. In addition, the previous DFUAS assessment reliability test is only performed on certified wound nurses whereas in health care services in patients with diabetic foot injuries are also performed by non-certified general nurses. This study aims to assess the interrater reliability and internal consistency of DFUAS-based on photo assessment on expert nurses and general nurses. The design of this study was cross sectional study. The samples in this study were certified nurses with ETN, CWCC, CWCCA and general non-certified Nurses with more than 2 years experience of wound care. The nurse as an observer evaluated 8 wounded images divided according to the wound stage (necrotic, slough, granulation and epithelial) using DFUAS assessment. Interrater reliability was assessed by spearman rho while internal consistency was assessed by cronbach's alpha. Interrater reliability shows good correlation with spearman rho> 0.60. Internal consistency shows good reliability between DFUAS assessment items and Cronbach's alpha 0.98. This study shows that the DFUAS assessment is reliable on different nurses both certified nurses and general nurses.\",\"PeriodicalId\":378605,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Kesehatan Manarang\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Kesehatan Manarang\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33490/JKM.V5I1.82\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Kesehatan Manarang","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33490/JKM.V5I1.82","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

糖尿病足溃疡患病率高,需要良好的护理管理。其中之一是通过评估糖尿病足部伤口。目前,对新版糖尿病足溃疡评估量表(DFUAS)的糖尿病足愈合录像进行了回顾,并对其进行了效度和基于照片的信度测试。然而,在DFUAS评估信度测试中,对伤口护士的几个DFUAS评估变量的认知仍然存在差异。原因之一是没有对伤口护士进行关于如何评估DFUAS评估的社会化培训。此外,以前的DFUAS评估信度测试仅对认证的伤口护士进行,而在医疗服务中,糖尿病足损伤患者也由非认证的普通护士进行。本研究旨在通过对专科护士和普通护士的照片评估来评估dfuas的互信度和内部一致性。本研究设计为横断面研究。本研究样本为具有ETN、CWCC、CWCCA认证的护士和具有2年以上伤口护理经验的普通非认证护士。护士作为观察员对8张根据伤口分期(坏死、脱痂、肉芽和上皮)进行DFUAS评估的损伤图像进行评估。评估者间信度采用spearman rho,内部一致性采用cronbach’s alpha。判读信度呈良好的相关性,spearman rho> 0.60。内部一致性表明,DFUAS评估项目与Cronbach's α的信度为0.98。本研究表明,DFUAS评估在不同的护士中是可靠的,无论是注册护士还是普通护士。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
INTERRATER RELIABILITY DAN INTERNAL CONSISTENCY PENGKAJIAN LUKA KAKI DIABETIK THE NEW DIABETIC FOOT ULCER ASSESSMENT SCALE (DFUAS) BERBASIS FOTO
Diabetic foot ulcers have a high prevalence that requires good management of care. One of them is by assessing diabetic foot wounds. Currently, there has been a review of diabetic foot healing footage of New Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment Scale (DFUAS) which has been tested for validity and photo-based reliability. Nevertheless, in the DFUAS Assessment Reliability Test, there are still differences in perceptions on several DFUAS assessment variables on wound nurses. One reason is that there is no socialization given to the wound nurses on how to assess the DFUAS assessment. In addition, the previous DFUAS assessment reliability test is only performed on certified wound nurses whereas in health care services in patients with diabetic foot injuries are also performed by non-certified general nurses. This study aims to assess the interrater reliability and internal consistency of DFUAS-based on photo assessment on expert nurses and general nurses. The design of this study was cross sectional study. The samples in this study were certified nurses with ETN, CWCC, CWCCA and general non-certified Nurses with more than 2 years experience of wound care. The nurse as an observer evaluated 8 wounded images divided according to the wound stage (necrotic, slough, granulation and epithelial) using DFUAS assessment. Interrater reliability was assessed by spearman rho while internal consistency was assessed by cronbach's alpha. Interrater reliability shows good correlation with spearman rho> 0.60. Internal consistency shows good reliability between DFUAS assessment items and Cronbach's alpha 0.98. This study shows that the DFUAS assessment is reliable on different nurses both certified nurses and general nurses.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信