简单agent的最优竞赛设计

Arpita Ghosh, Robert D. Kleinberg
{"title":"简单agent的最优竞赛设计","authors":"Arpita Ghosh, Robert D. Kleinberg","doi":"10.1145/2600057.2602875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study the optimal design of contests for 'simple' agents, where potential contestants strategically reason about whether or not to participate in the contest, but do not strategize about the quality of their submissions. Consider a population of n agents, where an agent with type (qi, ci chooses between participating and producing a submission of quality qi at cost ci, versus not participating at all, to maximize her utility. How should a principal distribute a total prize V amongst the n ranks to maximize some increasing function of the qualities of elicited submissions in a contest with such simple agents' We first solve the optimal contest design problem in settings where agents have homogenous participation costs ci = c. Here, the contest that maximizes every increasing function of the elicited contributions qi is always a simple contest, awarding equal prizes of V/j* each to the top j* = V/c - Θ (√V/(c ln (V/c))) contestants. This is in contrast with the optimal contest structure in comparable models with strategic effort choices, where the optimal contest is either a winner-take-all contest or awards possibly unequal prizes, depending on the curvature of agents' effort cost functions. We next address the general case with heterogenous costs ci: here, agents' types (qici are inherently two-dimensional, which significantly complicates equilibrium analysis. With heterogenous costs, the optimal contest depends on the objective being maximized; our main result here is that the winner-take-all contest is a 3-approximation of the optimal contest when the principal's objective is to maximize the quality of the best elicited contribution. The proof of this result hinges around a `sub-equilibrium' lemma, which establishes a stochastic dominance relation between the distribution of qualities elicited in an equilibrium and a sub-equilibrium---a strategy profile that is a best response for all agents who choose to participate in that strategy profile; this relation between equilibria and sub-equilibria may be of more general interest.","PeriodicalId":203155,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the fifteenth ACM conference on Economics and computation","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimal contest design for simple agents\",\"authors\":\"Arpita Ghosh, Robert D. Kleinberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2600057.2602875\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We study the optimal design of contests for 'simple' agents, where potential contestants strategically reason about whether or not to participate in the contest, but do not strategize about the quality of their submissions. Consider a population of n agents, where an agent with type (qi, ci chooses between participating and producing a submission of quality qi at cost ci, versus not participating at all, to maximize her utility. How should a principal distribute a total prize V amongst the n ranks to maximize some increasing function of the qualities of elicited submissions in a contest with such simple agents' We first solve the optimal contest design problem in settings where agents have homogenous participation costs ci = c. Here, the contest that maximizes every increasing function of the elicited contributions qi is always a simple contest, awarding equal prizes of V/j* each to the top j* = V/c - Θ (√V/(c ln (V/c))) contestants. This is in contrast with the optimal contest structure in comparable models with strategic effort choices, where the optimal contest is either a winner-take-all contest or awards possibly unequal prizes, depending on the curvature of agents' effort cost functions. We next address the general case with heterogenous costs ci: here, agents' types (qici are inherently two-dimensional, which significantly complicates equilibrium analysis. With heterogenous costs, the optimal contest depends on the objective being maximized; our main result here is that the winner-take-all contest is a 3-approximation of the optimal contest when the principal's objective is to maximize the quality of the best elicited contribution. The proof of this result hinges around a `sub-equilibrium' lemma, which establishes a stochastic dominance relation between the distribution of qualities elicited in an equilibrium and a sub-equilibrium---a strategy profile that is a best response for all agents who choose to participate in that strategy profile; this relation between equilibria and sub-equilibria may be of more general interest.\",\"PeriodicalId\":203155,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the fifteenth ACM conference on Economics and computation\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the fifteenth ACM conference on Economics and computation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2600057.2602875\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the fifteenth ACM conference on Economics and computation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2600057.2602875","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

我们研究了“简单”代理竞赛的最优设计,其中潜在的参赛者策略性地考虑是否参加竞赛,但不考虑他们提交的质量。考虑n个代理的总体,其中类型为(qi, ci)的代理在参与并以成本ci提交质量qi与根本不参与之间做出选择,以最大化其效用。委托人应该如何在n个等级中分配总奖金V,以最大化在具有这种简单代理的竞赛中引出的提交的质量的一些增加函数?我们首先解决在代理具有同质参与成本ci = c的设置下的最优竞赛设计问题。在这里,最大化引出的贡献qi的每个增加函数的竞赛总是一个简单的竞赛。前j* = V/c - Θ(√V/(c ln (V/c)))))选手每人等额奖励V/j*。这与具有战略努力选择的可比较模型中的最优竞赛结构形成对比,其中最优竞赛要么是赢家通吃的竞赛,要么可能奖励不平等的奖励,这取决于代理的努力成本函数的曲率。接下来,我们将讨论异质性成本ci的一般情况:在这里,主体类型(qici)本质上是二维的,这大大复杂化了均衡分析。在成本异质性情况下,最优竞争取决于目标最大化;我们这里的主要结果是,当委托人的目标是最大化最佳诱导贡献的质量时,赢家通吃的竞赛是最优竞赛的3近似。这一结果的证明取决于一个“次均衡”引理,它在均衡和次均衡中得出的品质分布之间建立了随机优势关系——对于所有选择参与该策略的代理来说,策略配置文件是最佳反应;均衡和次均衡之间的这种关系可能具有更普遍的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimal contest design for simple agents
We study the optimal design of contests for 'simple' agents, where potential contestants strategically reason about whether or not to participate in the contest, but do not strategize about the quality of their submissions. Consider a population of n agents, where an agent with type (qi, ci chooses between participating and producing a submission of quality qi at cost ci, versus not participating at all, to maximize her utility. How should a principal distribute a total prize V amongst the n ranks to maximize some increasing function of the qualities of elicited submissions in a contest with such simple agents' We first solve the optimal contest design problem in settings where agents have homogenous participation costs ci = c. Here, the contest that maximizes every increasing function of the elicited contributions qi is always a simple contest, awarding equal prizes of V/j* each to the top j* = V/c - Θ (√V/(c ln (V/c))) contestants. This is in contrast with the optimal contest structure in comparable models with strategic effort choices, where the optimal contest is either a winner-take-all contest or awards possibly unequal prizes, depending on the curvature of agents' effort cost functions. We next address the general case with heterogenous costs ci: here, agents' types (qici are inherently two-dimensional, which significantly complicates equilibrium analysis. With heterogenous costs, the optimal contest depends on the objective being maximized; our main result here is that the winner-take-all contest is a 3-approximation of the optimal contest when the principal's objective is to maximize the quality of the best elicited contribution. The proof of this result hinges around a `sub-equilibrium' lemma, which establishes a stochastic dominance relation between the distribution of qualities elicited in an equilibrium and a sub-equilibrium---a strategy profile that is a best response for all agents who choose to participate in that strategy profile; this relation between equilibria and sub-equilibria may be of more general interest.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信