几种超分辨率高光谱图像融合方法的比较

Hongwen Lin, Jian Chen
{"title":"几种超分辨率高光谱图像融合方法的比较","authors":"Hongwen Lin, Jian Chen","doi":"10.1109/ICIVC.2018.8492889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hyperspectral image applications have been explored in various areas, but they are often suffered from coarser spatial resolutions. In recent years, many hyperspectral image fusion approaches which merge hyperspectral image with multi-spectral or panchromatic one have been presented to improve the spatial resolution of hyperspectral image. In this paper, we compared four state-of-the-art hyperspectral fusion methods, namely coupled nonnegative matrix factorization (CNMF) method, sparse matrix factorization (SPMF) method, hyperspectral Image superresolution (HySure) method and sparse representation (SPRE) method. The main idea of each method is depicted briefly, five statistical assessment parameters, namely cross correlation (CC), root-mean-square error (RMSE), spectral angle mapper (SAM), universal image quality index (UIQI), and relative dimensionless global error in synthesis (ERGAS) are adopted to comparatively analyze the fusion results. The experimental results show that the effect of method based on sparse representation is superior to the others one.","PeriodicalId":173981,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Image, Vision and Computing (ICIVC)","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Several Hyperspectral Image Fusion Methods for Superresolution\",\"authors\":\"Hongwen Lin, Jian Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICIVC.2018.8492889\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Hyperspectral image applications have been explored in various areas, but they are often suffered from coarser spatial resolutions. In recent years, many hyperspectral image fusion approaches which merge hyperspectral image with multi-spectral or panchromatic one have been presented to improve the spatial resolution of hyperspectral image. In this paper, we compared four state-of-the-art hyperspectral fusion methods, namely coupled nonnegative matrix factorization (CNMF) method, sparse matrix factorization (SPMF) method, hyperspectral Image superresolution (HySure) method and sparse representation (SPRE) method. The main idea of each method is depicted briefly, five statistical assessment parameters, namely cross correlation (CC), root-mean-square error (RMSE), spectral angle mapper (SAM), universal image quality index (UIQI), and relative dimensionless global error in synthesis (ERGAS) are adopted to comparatively analyze the fusion results. The experimental results show that the effect of method based on sparse representation is superior to the others one.\",\"PeriodicalId\":173981,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Image, Vision and Computing (ICIVC)\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Image, Vision and Computing (ICIVC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIVC.2018.8492889\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Image, Vision and Computing (ICIVC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIVC.2018.8492889","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

高光谱图像的应用已经在各个领域进行了探索,但它们往往受到较粗的空间分辨率的影响。近年来,为了提高高光谱图像的空间分辨率,提出了许多将高光谱图像与多光谱或全色图像合并的高光谱图像融合方法。本文比较了四种最先进的高光谱融合方法,即耦合非负矩阵分解(CNMF)方法、稀疏矩阵分解(SPMF)方法、高光谱图像超分辨率(HySure)方法和稀疏表示(SPRE)方法。简要介绍了每种方法的主要思想,并采用交叉相关(CC)、均方根误差(RMSE)、光谱角映射器(SAM)、通用图像质量指数(UIQI)和相对无量纲全局合成误差(ERGAS) 5个统计评价参数对融合结果进行对比分析。实验结果表明,基于稀疏表示的方法效果优于其他方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Several Hyperspectral Image Fusion Methods for Superresolution
Hyperspectral image applications have been explored in various areas, but they are often suffered from coarser spatial resolutions. In recent years, many hyperspectral image fusion approaches which merge hyperspectral image with multi-spectral or panchromatic one have been presented to improve the spatial resolution of hyperspectral image. In this paper, we compared four state-of-the-art hyperspectral fusion methods, namely coupled nonnegative matrix factorization (CNMF) method, sparse matrix factorization (SPMF) method, hyperspectral Image superresolution (HySure) method and sparse representation (SPRE) method. The main idea of each method is depicted briefly, five statistical assessment parameters, namely cross correlation (CC), root-mean-square error (RMSE), spectral angle mapper (SAM), universal image quality index (UIQI), and relative dimensionless global error in synthesis (ERGAS) are adopted to comparatively analyze the fusion results. The experimental results show that the effect of method based on sparse representation is superior to the others one.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信