CNN针对伊斯兰恐惧症和反美的战略认同含糊不清(例:CNN COM和cnnn.com)

Sabda Ningsih
{"title":"CNN针对伊斯兰恐惧症和反美的战略认同含糊不清(例:CNN COM和cnnn.com)","authors":"Sabda Ningsih","doi":"10.32787/ijir.v6i2.366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study analyzes the constructivist view of CNN's strategy on Islamophobia and Anti-American issues. Taking a case study of Islamophobia globally and Anti-Americanism in Indonesia, CNN provides two different identities regarding each issue that contradicts the assumptions of constructivism. Through descriptive qualitative research techniques and data collection documentation, the authors found that the strategy with two different identities for Islamophobia and Anti-Americanism is CNN's effort as a framing for the interests of the United States in the war on terror, as well as differentiating them from other news media. With news characteristics that are skeptical of the Middle East, CNN provides an identity as a supporter of Islamophobia and encourages the movement to grow. It's different if you switch to Indonesian news, CNN abandons its previous identity and builds a new identity with a narrative that supports Muslims from the point of view of Western countries. For constructivism, this dual identity strategy shows that CNN is a weak actor because they do not know who they really are and the ambiguity of the main interests they want to achieve","PeriodicalId":145410,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Journal of International Relations","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"AMBIGUITAS STRATEGI IDENTITAS CNN TERHADAP ISLAMOPHOBIA DAN ANTI-AMERIKA (KASUS: CNN.COM DAN CNNINDONESIA.COM)\",\"authors\":\"Sabda Ningsih\",\"doi\":\"10.32787/ijir.v6i2.366\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study analyzes the constructivist view of CNN's strategy on Islamophobia and Anti-American issues. Taking a case study of Islamophobia globally and Anti-Americanism in Indonesia, CNN provides two different identities regarding each issue that contradicts the assumptions of constructivism. Through descriptive qualitative research techniques and data collection documentation, the authors found that the strategy with two different identities for Islamophobia and Anti-Americanism is CNN's effort as a framing for the interests of the United States in the war on terror, as well as differentiating them from other news media. With news characteristics that are skeptical of the Middle East, CNN provides an identity as a supporter of Islamophobia and encourages the movement to grow. It's different if you switch to Indonesian news, CNN abandons its previous identity and builds a new identity with a narrative that supports Muslims from the point of view of Western countries. For constructivism, this dual identity strategy shows that CNN is a weak actor because they do not know who they really are and the ambiguity of the main interests they want to achieve\",\"PeriodicalId\":145410,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indonesian Journal of International Relations\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indonesian Journal of International Relations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32787/ijir.v6i2.366\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Journal of International Relations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32787/ijir.v6i2.366","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究分析了CNN在伊斯兰恐惧症和反美问题上的策略的建构主义观点。CNN以全球的伊斯兰恐惧症和印度尼西亚的反美主义为例,对每个与建构主义假设相矛盾的问题提供了两种不同的身份。通过描述性定性研究技术和数据收集文献,作者发现,这种伊斯兰恐惧症和反美主义两种不同身份的策略是CNN在反恐战争中作为美国利益框架的努力,并将其与其他新闻媒体区分开来。CNN以对中东持怀疑态度的新闻特点,提供了伊斯兰恐惧症支持者的身份,并鼓励该运动的发展。如果你转到印尼新闻,情况就不同了,CNN放弃了之前的身份,建立了一个新的身份,从西方国家的角度支持穆斯林的叙事。对于建构主义来说,这种双重身份策略表明CNN是一个弱势行动者,因为他们不知道自己到底是谁,他们想要实现的主要利益是模糊的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
AMBIGUITAS STRATEGI IDENTITAS CNN TERHADAP ISLAMOPHOBIA DAN ANTI-AMERIKA (KASUS: CNN.COM DAN CNNINDONESIA.COM)
This study analyzes the constructivist view of CNN's strategy on Islamophobia and Anti-American issues. Taking a case study of Islamophobia globally and Anti-Americanism in Indonesia, CNN provides two different identities regarding each issue that contradicts the assumptions of constructivism. Through descriptive qualitative research techniques and data collection documentation, the authors found that the strategy with two different identities for Islamophobia and Anti-Americanism is CNN's effort as a framing for the interests of the United States in the war on terror, as well as differentiating them from other news media. With news characteristics that are skeptical of the Middle East, CNN provides an identity as a supporter of Islamophobia and encourages the movement to grow. It's different if you switch to Indonesian news, CNN abandons its previous identity and builds a new identity with a narrative that supports Muslims from the point of view of Western countries. For constructivism, this dual identity strategy shows that CNN is a weak actor because they do not know who they really are and the ambiguity of the main interests they want to achieve
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信