民事电子司法平台:现状、风险与展望

Viktoria F. Borisova
{"title":"民事电子司法平台:现状、风险与展望","authors":"Viktoria F. Borisova","doi":"10.18572/1812-383x-2021-4-13-17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the analysis of procedural services of the justice system, the Integrated information system of courts of general jurisdiction, and the justice online superservice. As a result of the conducted comparison, fully and imperfectly functioning procedural options were identified, as well as the circumstances that prevent their application. The author identifies alarming trends related to the digitalization of justice. Among them: parallel co-existence of many information platforms of courts with various ‘electronic’ procedural services; binding of tested automated information systems to the courts of a certain region; blurring of the essence of justice as a type of law enforcement state activity, through which judicial power is exercised; unresolved problems of legal regulation, weighed down by a layer of new gaps caused by the digitalization of justice and the use of artificial intelligence. In this regard, the author defines the directions for improving the legal regulation of procedural legal relations implemented in electronic format.","PeriodicalId":254727,"journal":{"name":"Arbitrazh-Civil Procedure","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Electronic Justice Platforms in Civil Cases: The Status, Risks, Prospects\",\"authors\":\"Viktoria F. Borisova\",\"doi\":\"10.18572/1812-383x-2021-4-13-17\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article is devoted to the analysis of procedural services of the justice system, the Integrated information system of courts of general jurisdiction, and the justice online superservice. As a result of the conducted comparison, fully and imperfectly functioning procedural options were identified, as well as the circumstances that prevent their application. The author identifies alarming trends related to the digitalization of justice. Among them: parallel co-existence of many information platforms of courts with various ‘electronic’ procedural services; binding of tested automated information systems to the courts of a certain region; blurring of the essence of justice as a type of law enforcement state activity, through which judicial power is exercised; unresolved problems of legal regulation, weighed down by a layer of new gaps caused by the digitalization of justice and the use of artificial intelligence. In this regard, the author defines the directions for improving the legal regulation of procedural legal relations implemented in electronic format.\",\"PeriodicalId\":254727,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arbitrazh-Civil Procedure\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arbitrazh-Civil Procedure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-383x-2021-4-13-17\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arbitrazh-Civil Procedure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-383x-2021-4-13-17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对司法系统程序服务、普通管辖法院综合信息系统和司法网上超级服务进行了分析。由于进行了比较,查明了功能充分和不完善的程序选择,以及妨碍其应用的情况。作者指出了与司法数字化有关的令人担忧的趋势。其中包括:多个法院信息平台与各种“电子”诉讼服务并行共存;将经过测试的自动化信息系统绑定到某一地区的法院;司法作为行使司法权的一种国家执法活动的本质模糊;司法数字化和人工智能的使用带来了一层新的空白,这给尚未解决的法律监管问题带来了压力。在此基础上,笔者明确了完善电子格式程序性法律关系法律规制的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Electronic Justice Platforms in Civil Cases: The Status, Risks, Prospects
The article is devoted to the analysis of procedural services of the justice system, the Integrated information system of courts of general jurisdiction, and the justice online superservice. As a result of the conducted comparison, fully and imperfectly functioning procedural options were identified, as well as the circumstances that prevent their application. The author identifies alarming trends related to the digitalization of justice. Among them: parallel co-existence of many information platforms of courts with various ‘electronic’ procedural services; binding of tested automated information systems to the courts of a certain region; blurring of the essence of justice as a type of law enforcement state activity, through which judicial power is exercised; unresolved problems of legal regulation, weighed down by a layer of new gaps caused by the digitalization of justice and the use of artificial intelligence. In this regard, the author defines the directions for improving the legal regulation of procedural legal relations implemented in electronic format.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信