{"title":"临时冠与固定局部义齿树脂的抗弯强度研究。","authors":"D. R. Haselton, A. Diaz-Arnold, M. Vargas","doi":"10.1067/MPR.2002.121406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"STATEMENT OF PROBLEM\nProvisional prostheses are subject to flexure under function. Selection of the appropriate material for their fabrication is difficult given the limited evidence-based information on the flexural strength of provisional resins.\n\n\nPURPOSE\nThis study compared the flexural strength of 5 methacrylate-based resins and 8 bis-acryl resins used to fabricate provisional crowns and fixed partial dentures.\n\n\nMATERIAL AND METHODS\nBar-type specimens were fabricated according to American National Standards Institute/American Dental Association specification 27. After being immersed in artificial saliva at 37 degrees C for 10 days, the specimens were fractured under 3-point loading in a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.75 mm/min. Maximal loads to fracture in Newtons were recorded. Mean flexural strengths were calculated in MPa (n = 10 per group). Comparisons were made with analysis of variance and Duncan's multiple range test (P<.05).\n\n\nRESULTS\nMean flexural strengths ranged from 56.2 to 123.6 MPa. There were 4 statistically similar groups. The group with the highest strengths consisted of 4 bis-acryl materials (Provipont, Integrity, Protemp 3 Garant, and Luxatemp).\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nWithin the limitations of this study, flexural strengths were material- rather than category-specific. Some, but not all, bis-acryl resins demonstrated significantly superior flexural strength over traditional methacrylate resins.","PeriodicalId":185384,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of prosthetic dentistry","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"145","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Flexural strength of provisional crown and fixed partial denture resins.\",\"authors\":\"D. R. Haselton, A. Diaz-Arnold, M. Vargas\",\"doi\":\"10.1067/MPR.2002.121406\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"STATEMENT OF PROBLEM\\nProvisional prostheses are subject to flexure under function. Selection of the appropriate material for their fabrication is difficult given the limited evidence-based information on the flexural strength of provisional resins.\\n\\n\\nPURPOSE\\nThis study compared the flexural strength of 5 methacrylate-based resins and 8 bis-acryl resins used to fabricate provisional crowns and fixed partial dentures.\\n\\n\\nMATERIAL AND METHODS\\nBar-type specimens were fabricated according to American National Standards Institute/American Dental Association specification 27. After being immersed in artificial saliva at 37 degrees C for 10 days, the specimens were fractured under 3-point loading in a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.75 mm/min. Maximal loads to fracture in Newtons were recorded. Mean flexural strengths were calculated in MPa (n = 10 per group). Comparisons were made with analysis of variance and Duncan's multiple range test (P<.05).\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nMean flexural strengths ranged from 56.2 to 123.6 MPa. There were 4 statistically similar groups. The group with the highest strengths consisted of 4 bis-acryl materials (Provipont, Integrity, Protemp 3 Garant, and Luxatemp).\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSION\\nWithin the limitations of this study, flexural strengths were material- rather than category-specific. Some, but not all, bis-acryl resins demonstrated significantly superior flexural strength over traditional methacrylate resins.\",\"PeriodicalId\":185384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of prosthetic dentistry\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"145\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of prosthetic dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1067/MPR.2002.121406\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of prosthetic dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1067/MPR.2002.121406","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Flexural strength of provisional crown and fixed partial denture resins.
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM
Provisional prostheses are subject to flexure under function. Selection of the appropriate material for their fabrication is difficult given the limited evidence-based information on the flexural strength of provisional resins.
PURPOSE
This study compared the flexural strength of 5 methacrylate-based resins and 8 bis-acryl resins used to fabricate provisional crowns and fixed partial dentures.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Bar-type specimens were fabricated according to American National Standards Institute/American Dental Association specification 27. After being immersed in artificial saliva at 37 degrees C for 10 days, the specimens were fractured under 3-point loading in a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.75 mm/min. Maximal loads to fracture in Newtons were recorded. Mean flexural strengths were calculated in MPa (n = 10 per group). Comparisons were made with analysis of variance and Duncan's multiple range test (P<.05).
RESULTS
Mean flexural strengths ranged from 56.2 to 123.6 MPa. There were 4 statistically similar groups. The group with the highest strengths consisted of 4 bis-acryl materials (Provipont, Integrity, Protemp 3 Garant, and Luxatemp).
CONCLUSION
Within the limitations of this study, flexural strengths were material- rather than category-specific. Some, but not all, bis-acryl resins demonstrated significantly superior flexural strength over traditional methacrylate resins.