临时冠与固定局部义齿树脂的抗弯强度研究。

D. R. Haselton, A. Diaz-Arnold, M. Vargas
{"title":"临时冠与固定局部义齿树脂的抗弯强度研究。","authors":"D. R. Haselton, A. Diaz-Arnold, M. Vargas","doi":"10.1067/MPR.2002.121406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"STATEMENT OF PROBLEM\nProvisional prostheses are subject to flexure under function. Selection of the appropriate material for their fabrication is difficult given the limited evidence-based information on the flexural strength of provisional resins.\n\n\nPURPOSE\nThis study compared the flexural strength of 5 methacrylate-based resins and 8 bis-acryl resins used to fabricate provisional crowns and fixed partial dentures.\n\n\nMATERIAL AND METHODS\nBar-type specimens were fabricated according to American National Standards Institute/American Dental Association specification 27. After being immersed in artificial saliva at 37 degrees C for 10 days, the specimens were fractured under 3-point loading in a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.75 mm/min. Maximal loads to fracture in Newtons were recorded. Mean flexural strengths were calculated in MPa (n = 10 per group). Comparisons were made with analysis of variance and Duncan's multiple range test (P<.05).\n\n\nRESULTS\nMean flexural strengths ranged from 56.2 to 123.6 MPa. There were 4 statistically similar groups. The group with the highest strengths consisted of 4 bis-acryl materials (Provipont, Integrity, Protemp 3 Garant, and Luxatemp).\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nWithin the limitations of this study, flexural strengths were material- rather than category-specific. Some, but not all, bis-acryl resins demonstrated significantly superior flexural strength over traditional methacrylate resins.","PeriodicalId":185384,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of prosthetic dentistry","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"145","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Flexural strength of provisional crown and fixed partial denture resins.\",\"authors\":\"D. R. Haselton, A. Diaz-Arnold, M. Vargas\",\"doi\":\"10.1067/MPR.2002.121406\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"STATEMENT OF PROBLEM\\nProvisional prostheses are subject to flexure under function. Selection of the appropriate material for their fabrication is difficult given the limited evidence-based information on the flexural strength of provisional resins.\\n\\n\\nPURPOSE\\nThis study compared the flexural strength of 5 methacrylate-based resins and 8 bis-acryl resins used to fabricate provisional crowns and fixed partial dentures.\\n\\n\\nMATERIAL AND METHODS\\nBar-type specimens were fabricated according to American National Standards Institute/American Dental Association specification 27. After being immersed in artificial saliva at 37 degrees C for 10 days, the specimens were fractured under 3-point loading in a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.75 mm/min. Maximal loads to fracture in Newtons were recorded. Mean flexural strengths were calculated in MPa (n = 10 per group). Comparisons were made with analysis of variance and Duncan's multiple range test (P<.05).\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nMean flexural strengths ranged from 56.2 to 123.6 MPa. There were 4 statistically similar groups. The group with the highest strengths consisted of 4 bis-acryl materials (Provipont, Integrity, Protemp 3 Garant, and Luxatemp).\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSION\\nWithin the limitations of this study, flexural strengths were material- rather than category-specific. Some, but not all, bis-acryl resins demonstrated significantly superior flexural strength over traditional methacrylate resins.\",\"PeriodicalId\":185384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of prosthetic dentistry\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"145\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of prosthetic dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1067/MPR.2002.121406\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of prosthetic dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1067/MPR.2002.121406","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 145

摘要

问题说明临时假体在功能下容易弯曲。考虑到临时树脂的抗折强度有限的证据信息,选择合适的材料制造是困难的。目的比较5种甲基丙烯酸酯树脂和8种双丙烯酸酯树脂用于制作临时冠和固定义齿的抗弯强度。材料和方法bar型试样按照美国国家标准协会/美国牙科协会规范27制作。试件在37℃人工唾液中浸泡10天后,在万能试验机中以0.75 mm/min的十字速度进行三点加载断裂。以牛顿为单位记录最大断裂载荷。平均抗弯强度以MPa计算(n = 10 /组)。采用方差分析和Duncan多重极差检验进行比较(P< 0.05)。结果平均抗弯强度为56.2 ~ 123.6 MPa。有4个统计学上相似的组。强度最高的一组包括4种双丙烯酸酯材料(Provipont、Integrity、Protemp 3 Garant和Luxatemp)。结论:在本研究的局限性内,抗弯强度是材料而非类别特异性的。一些,但不是全部,双丙烯酸酯树脂表现出明显优于传统的甲基丙烯酸酯树脂的抗弯强度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Flexural strength of provisional crown and fixed partial denture resins.
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM Provisional prostheses are subject to flexure under function. Selection of the appropriate material for their fabrication is difficult given the limited evidence-based information on the flexural strength of provisional resins. PURPOSE This study compared the flexural strength of 5 methacrylate-based resins and 8 bis-acryl resins used to fabricate provisional crowns and fixed partial dentures. MATERIAL AND METHODS Bar-type specimens were fabricated according to American National Standards Institute/American Dental Association specification 27. After being immersed in artificial saliva at 37 degrees C for 10 days, the specimens were fractured under 3-point loading in a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.75 mm/min. Maximal loads to fracture in Newtons were recorded. Mean flexural strengths were calculated in MPa (n = 10 per group). Comparisons were made with analysis of variance and Duncan's multiple range test (P<.05). RESULTS Mean flexural strengths ranged from 56.2 to 123.6 MPa. There were 4 statistically similar groups. The group with the highest strengths consisted of 4 bis-acryl materials (Provipont, Integrity, Protemp 3 Garant, and Luxatemp). CONCLUSION Within the limitations of this study, flexural strengths were material- rather than category-specific. Some, but not all, bis-acryl resins demonstrated significantly superior flexural strength over traditional methacrylate resins.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信