通过透支向前追溯而不是向后追溯的情况

David C. Wilde
{"title":"通过透支向前追溯而不是向后追溯的情况","authors":"David C. Wilde","doi":"10.1093/tandt/ttad014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article suggests that there is a respectable argument—contrary to generally held views—that equity can often trace through an overdrawn bank account, on general principle. But the direction of that tracing would be forward (as normal with tracing); not backward (the unconventional direction usually associated with potential tracing through overdrafts).","PeriodicalId":171463,"journal":{"name":"Trusts & Trustees","volume":"2012 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The case for tracing forward not backward through an overdraft\",\"authors\":\"David C. Wilde\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/tandt/ttad014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This article suggests that there is a respectable argument—contrary to generally held views—that equity can often trace through an overdrawn bank account, on general principle. But the direction of that tracing would be forward (as normal with tracing); not backward (the unconventional direction usually associated with potential tracing through overdrafts).\",\"PeriodicalId\":171463,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trusts & Trustees\",\"volume\":\"2012 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trusts & Trustees\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/tandt/ttad014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trusts & Trustees","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tandt/ttad014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章提出了一个值得尊敬的论点——与普遍持有的观点相反——一般来说,股权通常可以通过透支的银行账户追查到。但是追踪的方向是向前的(和正常的追踪一样);而不是向后(非常规的方向通常与潜在的透支追踪有关)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The case for tracing forward not backward through an overdraft
This article suggests that there is a respectable argument—contrary to generally held views—that equity can often trace through an overdrawn bank account, on general principle. But the direction of that tracing would be forward (as normal with tracing); not backward (the unconventional direction usually associated with potential tracing through overdrafts).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信