实验和计算气缸压力和放热历史比较中的系统不确定性考虑

K. Partridge, P. R. Jha, Hamidreza Mahabadipour, K. Srinivasan, S. Krishnan
{"title":"实验和计算气缸压力和放热历史比较中的系统不确定性考虑","authors":"K. Partridge, P. R. Jha, Hamidreza Mahabadipour, K. Srinivasan, S. Krishnan","doi":"10.1115/ICEF2018-9707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Computational simulations of engine combustion processes are increasingly relied upon to lead the design of advanced IC engines. Both computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations as well as thermodynamics-based phenomenological 0D or 1D gas dynamics simulations are examples of current simulation strategies. Before simulations can be utilized to guide the design process, they must be validated with experimental results. Typically, the experimental data used for validation of computational simulations include in-cylinder pressure and apparent heat release rate (AHRR) histories. However, the process of comparison of experimental and simulated pressure and AHRR curves is largely qualitative; therefore, the validation process is mostly visual. In the present work, the authors introduce a framework for quantifying uncertainties in experimental pressure data, as well as uncertainties in the “average” AHRR curve that is derived from ensemble-averaged cylinder pressure histories. Predicted AHRR curves from CFD simulations are also quantitatively compared with the experimental AHRR bounded by “uncertainty bands” in the present work.","PeriodicalId":441369,"journal":{"name":"Volume 1: Large Bore Engines; Fuels; Advanced Combustion","volume":"1988 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systematic Uncertainty Considerations in the Comparison of Experimental and Computed Cylinder Pressure and Heat Release Histories\",\"authors\":\"K. Partridge, P. R. Jha, Hamidreza Mahabadipour, K. Srinivasan, S. Krishnan\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/ICEF2018-9707\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Computational simulations of engine combustion processes are increasingly relied upon to lead the design of advanced IC engines. Both computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations as well as thermodynamics-based phenomenological 0D or 1D gas dynamics simulations are examples of current simulation strategies. Before simulations can be utilized to guide the design process, they must be validated with experimental results. Typically, the experimental data used for validation of computational simulations include in-cylinder pressure and apparent heat release rate (AHRR) histories. However, the process of comparison of experimental and simulated pressure and AHRR curves is largely qualitative; therefore, the validation process is mostly visual. In the present work, the authors introduce a framework for quantifying uncertainties in experimental pressure data, as well as uncertainties in the “average” AHRR curve that is derived from ensemble-averaged cylinder pressure histories. Predicted AHRR curves from CFD simulations are also quantitatively compared with the experimental AHRR bounded by “uncertainty bands” in the present work.\",\"PeriodicalId\":441369,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Volume 1: Large Bore Engines; Fuels; Advanced Combustion\",\"volume\":\"1988 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Volume 1: Large Bore Engines; Fuels; Advanced Combustion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/ICEF2018-9707\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 1: Large Bore Engines; Fuels; Advanced Combustion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/ICEF2018-9707","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

发动机燃烧过程的计算模拟越来越依赖于先进内燃机的设计。计算流体动力学(CFD)模拟以及基于热力学的现象0D或1D气体动力学模拟都是当前模拟策略的例子。在利用模拟来指导设计过程之前,必须用实验结果进行验证。通常,用于验证计算模拟的实验数据包括缸内压力和表观热释放率(AHRR)历史。然而,实验和模拟压力与AHRR曲线的比较过程在很大程度上是定性的;因此,验证过程主要是可视化的。在目前的工作中,作者引入了一个框架,用于量化实验压力数据中的不确定性,以及从整体平均气缸压力历史中得出的“平均”AHRR曲线中的不确定性。本文还将CFD模拟的预测AHRR曲线与以“不确定带”为界的实验AHRR曲线进行了定量比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Systematic Uncertainty Considerations in the Comparison of Experimental and Computed Cylinder Pressure and Heat Release Histories
Computational simulations of engine combustion processes are increasingly relied upon to lead the design of advanced IC engines. Both computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations as well as thermodynamics-based phenomenological 0D or 1D gas dynamics simulations are examples of current simulation strategies. Before simulations can be utilized to guide the design process, they must be validated with experimental results. Typically, the experimental data used for validation of computational simulations include in-cylinder pressure and apparent heat release rate (AHRR) histories. However, the process of comparison of experimental and simulated pressure and AHRR curves is largely qualitative; therefore, the validation process is mostly visual. In the present work, the authors introduce a framework for quantifying uncertainties in experimental pressure data, as well as uncertainties in the “average” AHRR curve that is derived from ensemble-averaged cylinder pressure histories. Predicted AHRR curves from CFD simulations are also quantitatively compared with the experimental AHRR bounded by “uncertainty bands” in the present work.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信