新贸易模式的微观经济学

IF 1.3 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS
Martin Alfaro
{"title":"新贸易模式的微观经济学","authors":"Martin Alfaro","doi":"10.1111/caje.12606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>International trade can increase product market competition and hence be pro-competitive. Is this feature captured in new trade models? I study this question in a setting with firm heterogeneity à la Melitz, under any productivity distribution and standard demands (e.g., demands from an additively separable utility, linear, translog, logit). My results indicate that better export opportunities are pro-competitive: they reduce the domestic firms' markups and induce the exit of the least productive domestic firms. But, surprisingly, tougher import competition is completely offset by a reduction in the mass of domestic incumbents, leaving the competitive environment unaffected. Thus, it does not impact the prices, quantities, or survival productivity cut-off of domestic firms. Consistent with previous studies, I also find that a reduction in import trade costs under two large countries and two-way trade always decreases competition. I show that this outcome can be rationalized as capturing worse export conditions exclusively.</p>","PeriodicalId":47941,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Economics-Revue Canadienne D Economique","volume":"55 3","pages":"1539-1565"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The microeconomics of new trade models\",\"authors\":\"Martin Alfaro\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/caje.12606\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>International trade can increase product market competition and hence be pro-competitive. Is this feature captured in new trade models? I study this question in a setting with firm heterogeneity à la Melitz, under any productivity distribution and standard demands (e.g., demands from an additively separable utility, linear, translog, logit). My results indicate that better export opportunities are pro-competitive: they reduce the domestic firms' markups and induce the exit of the least productive domestic firms. But, surprisingly, tougher import competition is completely offset by a reduction in the mass of domestic incumbents, leaving the competitive environment unaffected. Thus, it does not impact the prices, quantities, or survival productivity cut-off of domestic firms. Consistent with previous studies, I also find that a reduction in import trade costs under two large countries and two-way trade always decreases competition. I show that this outcome can be rationalized as capturing worse export conditions exclusively.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47941,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Economics-Revue Canadienne D Economique\",\"volume\":\"55 3\",\"pages\":\"1539-1565\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Economics-Revue Canadienne D Economique\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/caje.12606\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Economics-Revue Canadienne D Economique","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/caje.12606","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

国际贸易可以增加产品的市场竞争,因此有利于竞争。新的贸易模型中是否包含了这一特性?我在一个具有公司异质性(la Melitz)的环境中研究这个问题,在任何生产率分布和标准需求下(例如,来自可加可分效用、线性、超对数、logit的需求)。我的研究结果表明,更好的出口机会有利于竞争:它们降低了国内企业的利润率,并促使生产率最低的国内企业退出。但令人惊讶的是,更激烈的进口竞争完全被国内现有企业数量的减少所抵消,从而使竞争环境不受影响。因此,它不会影响国内企业的价格、数量或生存生产力。与以往的研究一致,我也发现在两个大国和双向贸易的情况下,进口贸易成本的降低总是会降低竞争。我表明,这一结果可以被合理化为只捕获了更糟糕的出口条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The microeconomics of new trade models

International trade can increase product market competition and hence be pro-competitive. Is this feature captured in new trade models? I study this question in a setting with firm heterogeneity à la Melitz, under any productivity distribution and standard demands (e.g., demands from an additively separable utility, linear, translog, logit). My results indicate that better export opportunities are pro-competitive: they reduce the domestic firms' markups and induce the exit of the least productive domestic firms. But, surprisingly, tougher import competition is completely offset by a reduction in the mass of domestic incumbents, leaving the competitive environment unaffected. Thus, it does not impact the prices, quantities, or survival productivity cut-off of domestic firms. Consistent with previous studies, I also find that a reduction in import trade costs under two large countries and two-way trade always decreases competition. I show that this outcome can be rationalized as capturing worse export conditions exclusively.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
86
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Economics (CJE) is the journal of the Canadian Economics Association (CEA) and is the primary academic economics journal based in Canada. The editors seek to maintain and enhance the position of the CJE as a major, internationally recognized journal and are very receptive to high-quality papers on any economics topic from any source. In addition, the editors recognize the Journal"s role as an important outlet for high-quality empirical papers about the Canadian economy and about Canadian policy issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信