{"title":"DOCSIS 3.1电缆调制解调器系统中混合调制码字与缩短码字的性能比较","authors":"Joonyoung Jung, Dong-Joon Choi, N. Hur","doi":"10.1109/ICCE.2015.7066563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper provides a performance comparison of mixed modulation codewords and shortened codewords defined in DOCSIS 3.1 specifications. In mixed modulation codewords, the same modulation constellation is not used for all sub-carriers of the OFDM symbol. The performance comparison is needed to decide efficient transmission parameters at the view of signal-to-noise ratio and spectral efficiency. In this paper, we present the more efficient codeword scheme from the comparison.","PeriodicalId":169402,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE)","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance comparison of mixed modulation codewords and shortened codewords in DOCSIS 3.1 cable modem system\",\"authors\":\"Joonyoung Jung, Dong-Joon Choi, N. Hur\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICCE.2015.7066563\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper provides a performance comparison of mixed modulation codewords and shortened codewords defined in DOCSIS 3.1 specifications. In mixed modulation codewords, the same modulation constellation is not used for all sub-carriers of the OFDM symbol. The performance comparison is needed to decide efficient transmission parameters at the view of signal-to-noise ratio and spectral efficiency. In this paper, we present the more efficient codeword scheme from the comparison.\",\"PeriodicalId\":169402,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE)\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCE.2015.7066563\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCE.2015.7066563","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Performance comparison of mixed modulation codewords and shortened codewords in DOCSIS 3.1 cable modem system
This paper provides a performance comparison of mixed modulation codewords and shortened codewords defined in DOCSIS 3.1 specifications. In mixed modulation codewords, the same modulation constellation is not used for all sub-carriers of the OFDM symbol. The performance comparison is needed to decide efficient transmission parameters at the view of signal-to-noise ratio and spectral efficiency. In this paper, we present the more efficient codeword scheme from the comparison.