时间序列分析作为非常规油藏递减曲线分析的替代方法

M. Malaieri, R. Matoorian, R. Shor
{"title":"时间序列分析作为非常规油藏递减曲线分析的替代方法","authors":"M. Malaieri, R. Matoorian, R. Shor","doi":"10.2118/209261-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Quick and reliable forecasting of production data is still challenging in unconventional plays, even with the variety of modifications proposed to Arps decline curve analysis (DCA). Machine learning revealed promising results when enough samples were accessible to train and validate the predictive model. However, this black-box model is inaccurate for unseen samples, challenging to generalize, and requires too much data. We attempted to present an alternative procedure to solve this problem —a fast and reliable method outperforming current approaches.\n In this study, we implemented univariate and multivariate times series analysis (TSA) to forecast production rate in the different scales (wellbore, field, and pad scales) where DCA failed to provide an appropriate fit beforehand. TSA is straightforward and enables recognition of the pattern in observation samples. Cyclic fluctuation due to seasonal changes in price and operational hours can be detected and indirectly considered in time series models like ETS (Exponential Smoothing) and ARIMA (Auto-Regressive Integration Moving Average). However, for the direct considerations of these critical parameters, Vector Auto-Regressive (VAR) models have the flexibility and ability to be configured with multiple variables and can capture more complexities.\n This simple and quick procedure applies on any scale from the wellbore to the field scales. To evaluate the performance, the TSA method has been applied and tested on data from the Duvernay shale in Western Canada. On the wellbore scale, modified DCA models forecast production rate with over/underestimation, even where enough observations are available, and if the well has shown a declining trend in the production. In the same wells, TSA provides a better fit and outperforms the DCA. In the field and pad scales, DCA could not draw a fitting model as production had a growing trend due to ongoing field developments. In contrast, TSA could realize the trend in the production data and successfully create the forecasting model. Price and production hours were added to the time series model as influential features on production. The model could forecast all the parameters simultaneously. In sum, TSA is a reliable and flexible alternative for DCA and can be implemented on production data in any scale.","PeriodicalId":224766,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Wed, April 27, 2022","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Time Series Analysis as an Alternative for Decline Curve Analysis in Unconventional Plays\",\"authors\":\"M. Malaieri, R. Matoorian, R. Shor\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/209261-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Quick and reliable forecasting of production data is still challenging in unconventional plays, even with the variety of modifications proposed to Arps decline curve analysis (DCA). Machine learning revealed promising results when enough samples were accessible to train and validate the predictive model. However, this black-box model is inaccurate for unseen samples, challenging to generalize, and requires too much data. We attempted to present an alternative procedure to solve this problem —a fast and reliable method outperforming current approaches.\\n In this study, we implemented univariate and multivariate times series analysis (TSA) to forecast production rate in the different scales (wellbore, field, and pad scales) where DCA failed to provide an appropriate fit beforehand. TSA is straightforward and enables recognition of the pattern in observation samples. Cyclic fluctuation due to seasonal changes in price and operational hours can be detected and indirectly considered in time series models like ETS (Exponential Smoothing) and ARIMA (Auto-Regressive Integration Moving Average). However, for the direct considerations of these critical parameters, Vector Auto-Regressive (VAR) models have the flexibility and ability to be configured with multiple variables and can capture more complexities.\\n This simple and quick procedure applies on any scale from the wellbore to the field scales. To evaluate the performance, the TSA method has been applied and tested on data from the Duvernay shale in Western Canada. On the wellbore scale, modified DCA models forecast production rate with over/underestimation, even where enough observations are available, and if the well has shown a declining trend in the production. In the same wells, TSA provides a better fit and outperforms the DCA. In the field and pad scales, DCA could not draw a fitting model as production had a growing trend due to ongoing field developments. In contrast, TSA could realize the trend in the production data and successfully create the forecasting model. Price and production hours were added to the time series model as influential features on production. The model could forecast all the parameters simultaneously. In sum, TSA is a reliable and flexible alternative for DCA and can be implemented on production data in any scale.\",\"PeriodicalId\":224766,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 2 Wed, April 27, 2022\",\"volume\":\"64 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 2 Wed, April 27, 2022\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/209261-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Wed, April 27, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/209261-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

尽管对Arps递减曲线分析(DCA)进行了各种修改,但在非常规油藏中,快速、可靠地预测产量数据仍然是一个挑战。当有足够的样本来训练和验证预测模型时,机器学习显示了有希望的结果。然而,这种黑盒模型对于看不见的样本是不准确的,难以推广,并且需要太多的数据。我们试图提出一种替代方法来解决这个问题——一种比现有方法更快、更可靠的方法。在这项研究中,我们采用了单变量和多变量时间序列分析(TSA)来预测不同规模(井筒、油田和垫块规模)的产量,而DCA无法事先提供适当的拟合。TSA是直接的,可以识别观察样本中的模式。价格和营业时间季节性变化引起的周期波动可以在ETS(指数平滑)和ARIMA(自回归积分移动平均)等时间序列模型中检测和间接考虑。然而,对于这些关键参数的直接考虑,向量自回归(VAR)模型具有配置多个变量的灵活性和能力,并且可以捕获更多的复杂性。这种简单快速的方法适用于从井筒到现场的任何尺度。为了评估其性能,TSA方法在加拿大西部Duvernay页岩的数据上进行了应用和测试。在井筒尺度上,即使有足够的观测数据,如果油井产量呈下降趋势,修正的DCA模型预测的产量也会高估或低估。在相同的井中,TSA提供了更好的配合,并且优于DCA。在油田和区块规模上,DCA无法绘制拟合模型,因为随着油田开发的进行,产量呈增长趋势。相比之下,TSA可以在生产数据中实现趋势,并成功地建立了预测模型。将价格和生产时间作为影响生产的特征添加到时间序列模型中。该模型能同时预测所有参数。总之,TSA是一种可靠而灵活的DCA替代方案,可以在任何规模的生产数据上实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Time Series Analysis as an Alternative for Decline Curve Analysis in Unconventional Plays
Quick and reliable forecasting of production data is still challenging in unconventional plays, even with the variety of modifications proposed to Arps decline curve analysis (DCA). Machine learning revealed promising results when enough samples were accessible to train and validate the predictive model. However, this black-box model is inaccurate for unseen samples, challenging to generalize, and requires too much data. We attempted to present an alternative procedure to solve this problem —a fast and reliable method outperforming current approaches. In this study, we implemented univariate and multivariate times series analysis (TSA) to forecast production rate in the different scales (wellbore, field, and pad scales) where DCA failed to provide an appropriate fit beforehand. TSA is straightforward and enables recognition of the pattern in observation samples. Cyclic fluctuation due to seasonal changes in price and operational hours can be detected and indirectly considered in time series models like ETS (Exponential Smoothing) and ARIMA (Auto-Regressive Integration Moving Average). However, for the direct considerations of these critical parameters, Vector Auto-Regressive (VAR) models have the flexibility and ability to be configured with multiple variables and can capture more complexities. This simple and quick procedure applies on any scale from the wellbore to the field scales. To evaluate the performance, the TSA method has been applied and tested on data from the Duvernay shale in Western Canada. On the wellbore scale, modified DCA models forecast production rate with over/underestimation, even where enough observations are available, and if the well has shown a declining trend in the production. In the same wells, TSA provides a better fit and outperforms the DCA. In the field and pad scales, DCA could not draw a fitting model as production had a growing trend due to ongoing field developments. In contrast, TSA could realize the trend in the production data and successfully create the forecasting model. Price and production hours were added to the time series model as influential features on production. The model could forecast all the parameters simultaneously. In sum, TSA is a reliable and flexible alternative for DCA and can be implemented on production data in any scale.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信