社交媒体上社交导航工具的评价标准探讨——以aNobii为例

Muh-Chyun Tang, Pei-Hang Ting, Yi-Jin Sie
{"title":"社交媒体上社交导航工具的评价标准探讨——以aNobii为例","authors":"Muh-Chyun Tang, Pei-Hang Ting, Yi-Jin Sie","doi":"10.1145/2362724.2362732","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A user study of aNobii was conducted to compare its three book-finding tools: author search, browsing friends' bookshelves and browsing similar bookshelves. The construct of \"social navigation\" was identified as a useful theoretical framework to discuss various modes of information access on social media.\n A within-subject experimental design was adopted where all forty regular aNobii users searched alternately with the three book-finding tools. Several novel evaluation measures were designed to explore the potential benefits these tools might bring to the users. Other than the self-report user experience and search result measures, the \"consideration set\" model was used as a novel framework for navigational effectiveness.\n Some major findings are as follows. While the author search function was shown to be the most efficient, browsing friends' bookshelves was shown to generate more interesting and informative browsing experience. Three evaluative dimensions were derived from our study: search experience, search efficiency, and search result quality. The disagreement of these measures shows a need for a multi-faceted evaluative framework for these exploration-based navigational tools.","PeriodicalId":413481,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Information Interaction in Context","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring evaluation criteria of social navigational tools on social media: a case study of aNobii\",\"authors\":\"Muh-Chyun Tang, Pei-Hang Ting, Yi-Jin Sie\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2362724.2362732\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A user study of aNobii was conducted to compare its three book-finding tools: author search, browsing friends' bookshelves and browsing similar bookshelves. The construct of \\\"social navigation\\\" was identified as a useful theoretical framework to discuss various modes of information access on social media.\\n A within-subject experimental design was adopted where all forty regular aNobii users searched alternately with the three book-finding tools. Several novel evaluation measures were designed to explore the potential benefits these tools might bring to the users. Other than the self-report user experience and search result measures, the \\\"consideration set\\\" model was used as a novel framework for navigational effectiveness.\\n Some major findings are as follows. While the author search function was shown to be the most efficient, browsing friends' bookshelves was shown to generate more interesting and informative browsing experience. Three evaluative dimensions were derived from our study: search experience, search efficiency, and search result quality. The disagreement of these measures shows a need for a multi-faceted evaluative framework for these exploration-based navigational tools.\",\"PeriodicalId\":413481,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Conference on Information Interaction in Context\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Conference on Information Interaction in Context\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2362724.2362732\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Information Interaction in Context","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2362724.2362732","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

对aNobii的用户进行了一项研究,比较了它的三种图书查找工具:作者搜索、浏览朋友的书架和浏览相似的书架。“社会导航”的构建被认为是讨论社交媒体上各种信息获取模式的一个有用的理论框架。采用主题内实验设计,所有40名常规aNobii用户交替使用三种寻书工具进行搜索。设计了几个新的评估方法来探索这些工具可能给用户带来的潜在好处。除了自我报告用户体验和搜索结果度量之外,“考虑集”模型被用作导航有效性的新框架。主要发现如下。虽然作者搜索功能被证明是最有效的,但浏览朋友的书架被证明能产生更有趣和信息丰富的浏览体验。我们的研究得出了三个评价维度:搜索体验、搜索效率和搜索结果质量。这些措施的分歧表明,需要对这些基于勘探的导航工具进行多方面的评估框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring evaluation criteria of social navigational tools on social media: a case study of aNobii
A user study of aNobii was conducted to compare its three book-finding tools: author search, browsing friends' bookshelves and browsing similar bookshelves. The construct of "social navigation" was identified as a useful theoretical framework to discuss various modes of information access on social media. A within-subject experimental design was adopted where all forty regular aNobii users searched alternately with the three book-finding tools. Several novel evaluation measures were designed to explore the potential benefits these tools might bring to the users. Other than the self-report user experience and search result measures, the "consideration set" model was used as a novel framework for navigational effectiveness. Some major findings are as follows. While the author search function was shown to be the most efficient, browsing friends' bookshelves was shown to generate more interesting and informative browsing experience. Three evaluative dimensions were derived from our study: search experience, search efficiency, and search result quality. The disagreement of these measures shows a need for a multi-faceted evaluative framework for these exploration-based navigational tools.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信