基于c波段SAR图像的地面风速检索综述:经验和电磁方法

Tran Vu La, A. Khenchaf, F. Comblet, C. Nahum
{"title":"基于c波段SAR图像的地面风速检索综述:经验和电磁方法","authors":"Tran Vu La, A. Khenchaf, F. Comblet, C. Nahum","doi":"10.1109/ATSIP.2017.8075512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In spite of the difference in description, it is reasonable to compare sea surface wind speed estimates based on empirical (EP) and electromagnetic (EM) approaches, since both of them describe the relation between radar backscattering and wind parameters, directly for EP models and via sea surface roughness spectrum for EM models. For EP approach, two methods are presented for wind speed estimation: scatterometry and model without wind direction input. For EM approach, the approximation models, i.e. small-slope approximation (SSA) and resonant curvature approximation (RCA), are presented since they can calculate radar backscattering close to that given by the EP models. The comparison between EP and EM models demonstrate that estimated wind speeds by two approaches are quite similar, especially for radar incidence angles below 40°.","PeriodicalId":259951,"journal":{"name":"2017 International Conference on Advanced Technologies for Signal and Image Processing (ATSIP)","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Overview of surface wind speed retrieval from C-band SAR images: Empirical and electromagnetic approaches\",\"authors\":\"Tran Vu La, A. Khenchaf, F. Comblet, C. Nahum\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ATSIP.2017.8075512\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In spite of the difference in description, it is reasonable to compare sea surface wind speed estimates based on empirical (EP) and electromagnetic (EM) approaches, since both of them describe the relation between radar backscattering and wind parameters, directly for EP models and via sea surface roughness spectrum for EM models. For EP approach, two methods are presented for wind speed estimation: scatterometry and model without wind direction input. For EM approach, the approximation models, i.e. small-slope approximation (SSA) and resonant curvature approximation (RCA), are presented since they can calculate radar backscattering close to that given by the EP models. The comparison between EP and EM models demonstrate that estimated wind speeds by two approaches are quite similar, especially for radar incidence angles below 40°.\",\"PeriodicalId\":259951,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 International Conference on Advanced Technologies for Signal and Image Processing (ATSIP)\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 International Conference on Advanced Technologies for Signal and Image Processing (ATSIP)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ATSIP.2017.8075512\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 International Conference on Advanced Technologies for Signal and Image Processing (ATSIP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ATSIP.2017.8075512","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

尽管在描述上存在差异,但比较基于经验(EP)和电磁(EM)方法的海面风速估算是合理的,因为它们都描述了雷达后向散射与风参数之间的关系,对于EP模式直接描述,而对于EM模式则通过海面粗糙度谱描述。对于EP方法,提出了两种风速估计方法:散射法和无风向输入的模型。对于电磁方法,由于小斜率近似(SSA)和共振曲率近似(RCA)可以计算出与EP模型接近的雷达后向散射,因此提出了它们的近似模型。EP模式和EM模式的比较表明,两种方法估计的风速非常相似,特别是当雷达入射角小于40°时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Overview of surface wind speed retrieval from C-band SAR images: Empirical and electromagnetic approaches
In spite of the difference in description, it is reasonable to compare sea surface wind speed estimates based on empirical (EP) and electromagnetic (EM) approaches, since both of them describe the relation between radar backscattering and wind parameters, directly for EP models and via sea surface roughness spectrum for EM models. For EP approach, two methods are presented for wind speed estimation: scatterometry and model without wind direction input. For EM approach, the approximation models, i.e. small-slope approximation (SSA) and resonant curvature approximation (RCA), are presented since they can calculate radar backscattering close to that given by the EP models. The comparison between EP and EM models demonstrate that estimated wind speeds by two approaches are quite similar, especially for radar incidence angles below 40°.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信