另一种使用脑电图测量认知负荷的客观方法

Hao-Cheng Chang, I-Chun Hung, S. Chew, N. Chen
{"title":"另一种使用脑电图测量认知负荷的客观方法","authors":"Hao-Cheng Chang, I-Chun Hung, S. Chew, N. Chen","doi":"10.1109/ICALT.2016.145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study conducted a preliminary investigation on the correlations between learners' EEG-based workload and their self-reported cognitive load in a multimedia learning context. An experiment including two learning tasks was conducted with 15 graduate students. The NeuroSky brainwave headset was used to collect participants' electroencephalography (EEG) data and using the theta/alpha ratio as brain workload during the learning tasks. On the other hand, a questionnaire was used to assess participants' self-reported cognitive load after the learning tasks. A paired samples t-test was used to test if there are any differences between the two learning tasks. The results show that cognitive load was significant, but the EEG-based theta/alpha ratio was not significant. In terms of the preliminary correlations, there are no significant results between the EEG-based theta/alpha ratio and cognitive load found. Future studies require more analyses of the EEG-based data, for example nonlinear approaches with a larger sample size.","PeriodicalId":188900,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT)","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Yet Another Objective Approach for Measuring Cognitive Load Using EEG-Based Workload\",\"authors\":\"Hao-Cheng Chang, I-Chun Hung, S. Chew, N. Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICALT.2016.145\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study conducted a preliminary investigation on the correlations between learners' EEG-based workload and their self-reported cognitive load in a multimedia learning context. An experiment including two learning tasks was conducted with 15 graduate students. The NeuroSky brainwave headset was used to collect participants' electroencephalography (EEG) data and using the theta/alpha ratio as brain workload during the learning tasks. On the other hand, a questionnaire was used to assess participants' self-reported cognitive load after the learning tasks. A paired samples t-test was used to test if there are any differences between the two learning tasks. The results show that cognitive load was significant, but the EEG-based theta/alpha ratio was not significant. In terms of the preliminary correlations, there are no significant results between the EEG-based theta/alpha ratio and cognitive load found. Future studies require more analyses of the EEG-based data, for example nonlinear approaches with a larger sample size.\",\"PeriodicalId\":188900,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT)\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2016.145\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2016.145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

本研究对多媒体学习环境下学习者基于脑电图的学习负荷与自我报告的认知负荷之间的相关性进行了初步探讨。以15名研究生为研究对象,进行了两个学习任务的实验。使用NeuroSky脑电波耳机收集参与者的脑电图(EEG)数据,并使用theta/alpha比率作为学习任务期间的大脑工作量。另一方面,研究人员使用问卷来评估参与者在学习任务后自我报告的认知负荷。使用配对样本t检验来检验两个学习任务之间是否存在差异。结果表明,认知负荷显著,但基于脑电图的θ / α比不显著。在初步的相关性方面,基于脑电图的θ / α比值与认知负荷之间没有发现显著的结果。未来的研究需要对基于脑电图的数据进行更多的分析,例如使用更大样本量的非线性方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Yet Another Objective Approach for Measuring Cognitive Load Using EEG-Based Workload
This study conducted a preliminary investigation on the correlations between learners' EEG-based workload and their self-reported cognitive load in a multimedia learning context. An experiment including two learning tasks was conducted with 15 graduate students. The NeuroSky brainwave headset was used to collect participants' electroencephalography (EEG) data and using the theta/alpha ratio as brain workload during the learning tasks. On the other hand, a questionnaire was used to assess participants' self-reported cognitive load after the learning tasks. A paired samples t-test was used to test if there are any differences between the two learning tasks. The results show that cognitive load was significant, but the EEG-based theta/alpha ratio was not significant. In terms of the preliminary correlations, there are no significant results between the EEG-based theta/alpha ratio and cognitive load found. Future studies require more analyses of the EEG-based data, for example nonlinear approaches with a larger sample size.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信