空中交通管制员的文化偏见及其对异常情况的反应研究

G. Kim, Sung-Hwan Cho
{"title":"空中交通管制员的文化偏见及其对异常情况的反应研究","authors":"G. Kim, Sung-Hwan Cho","doi":"10.12985/ksaa.2018.26.4.064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A status of air traffic controller is a government officer and air traffic controllers who work at airport are divided by duty rating and work experience. Abiding by law, rules and regulation, air traffic controllers are working together based on mutual trust. This paper’s theoretical background is based on cultural bias theory. The theory divide people group into four groups according to cultural bias such as fatalism, hierarchy, individualism and egalitarianism. A research model was designed how such four cultural bias could affect air traffic controller’s risk response in case of emergency or abnormal situation during their work. Depend on empirical research, it was found that air traffic controllers perceived they had been more biased to fatalism than hierarchy. The characteristics of fatalism group are as follows: first of all, they follow rigid rules and regulation. However, they have less self-efficacy compared to other government officers. According to structural equation model, air traffic controller’s fatalism had a significant negative effect on organizational royalty. Their royalty, however, had a very significant positive effect on planning response and immediate response.","PeriodicalId":132579,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Korean Society for Aviation and Aeronautics","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Study on Air Traffic Controllers’ Cultural bias and Their Response on Abnormal Situations\",\"authors\":\"G. Kim, Sung-Hwan Cho\",\"doi\":\"10.12985/ksaa.2018.26.4.064\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A status of air traffic controller is a government officer and air traffic controllers who work at airport are divided by duty rating and work experience. Abiding by law, rules and regulation, air traffic controllers are working together based on mutual trust. This paper’s theoretical background is based on cultural bias theory. The theory divide people group into four groups according to cultural bias such as fatalism, hierarchy, individualism and egalitarianism. A research model was designed how such four cultural bias could affect air traffic controller’s risk response in case of emergency or abnormal situation during their work. Depend on empirical research, it was found that air traffic controllers perceived they had been more biased to fatalism than hierarchy. The characteristics of fatalism group are as follows: first of all, they follow rigid rules and regulation. However, they have less self-efficacy compared to other government officers. According to structural equation model, air traffic controller’s fatalism had a significant negative effect on organizational royalty. Their royalty, however, had a very significant positive effect on planning response and immediate response.\",\"PeriodicalId\":132579,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Korean Society for Aviation and Aeronautics\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Korean Society for Aviation and Aeronautics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12985/ksaa.2018.26.4.064\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Korean Society for Aviation and Aeronautics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12985/ksaa.2018.26.4.064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

空中交通管制员的身份是政府官员,在机场工作的空中交通管制员按职责等级和工作经验划分。空中交通管制员遵纪守法,相互信任,相互协作。本文的理论背景是基于文化偏见理论。该理论根据宿命论、等级论、个人主义和平等主义等文化偏见,将人分为四类。设计了这四种文化偏见对空中交通管制员在工作中遇到紧急或异常情况时的风险反应影响的研究模型。根据实证研究发现,空中交通管制员认为他们更倾向于宿命论而不是等级制度。宿命论群体的特点是:首先,他们遵循严格的规章制度。但是,与其他政府官员相比,他们的自我效能感较低。根据结构方程模型,空管人员的宿命论对组织权利金有显著的负向影响。然而,他们的特许权对计划反应和即时反应有非常显著的积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Study on Air Traffic Controllers’ Cultural bias and Their Response on Abnormal Situations
A status of air traffic controller is a government officer and air traffic controllers who work at airport are divided by duty rating and work experience. Abiding by law, rules and regulation, air traffic controllers are working together based on mutual trust. This paper’s theoretical background is based on cultural bias theory. The theory divide people group into four groups according to cultural bias such as fatalism, hierarchy, individualism and egalitarianism. A research model was designed how such four cultural bias could affect air traffic controller’s risk response in case of emergency or abnormal situation during their work. Depend on empirical research, it was found that air traffic controllers perceived they had been more biased to fatalism than hierarchy. The characteristics of fatalism group are as follows: first of all, they follow rigid rules and regulation. However, they have less self-efficacy compared to other government officers. According to structural equation model, air traffic controller’s fatalism had a significant negative effect on organizational royalty. Their royalty, however, had a very significant positive effect on planning response and immediate response.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信